As opposed to a site primarily concerned with news ephemera, our central concern is on the theoretic/philosophical matters of fostering our human ecologies, defending them against antagonism, while correcting errant theory that leaves them susceptible to systemic breakdown.

As such, we hold the most viable position to be White Post Modern, a recentralization of our praxis (our people groups) in coordination, if your concern is to discern, defend and preserve your people against red caped post modernism, viz, weaponized misrepresentation; as well as ‘traditional’ ethnocentric antagonisms from outgroups, the blind rough shod of naïve modernity, or indeed, the disingenuous weaponization of modernity against us.

Hence, our motive is the reconstruction of our species, i.e., our self correctivity, social systemic homeostasis,  autonomy, sovereignty; with interests prioritized as such (in our social praxis) we do not only recognize the antagonism of others to our systemic homeostasis  – though there is that, notably from the YKW, from their genetic patterned conflict of interests to antagonism from elite niches they occupy issuing forth antagonistic rule structures – but a distinguishing characteristic of our platform, with its accountability and the agency it provides, is that our heremeneutic survey maintains vigil on our boundaries in 360 degrees, paying particularly attention to our own elitist, right wing sell outs, traitors, as well as liberals, violating our boundaries with the license/ licentiousness, coming from the same root, pseudo objectivity, pandered to as such, and its would-be minimizing of accountability would aid and abet. 

The problem of gender relations among Europeans in particular is thus seen largely as a property of insecure boundaries and borders to our people, while our females are pandered to from all angles, from the biopower of some antagonists to the elite power of other antagonists. The long term negative effects on pandering to puerile mentality and its empowerment with short term rewards, the pressuring of young boys to keep up, assimilating “universal maturity”, it remedied by the reconstuction of borders and bounds, giving the option when of age for people to leave and breed out, but not to impose their choice of others upon the group – that is involuntary contract (slavery).

This perspective is in correction of modernity’s blindness to important niche differences between people, as it ran rough shod over them in its impervious quest girded by lineal faith that change, with overly experimental hazard requires minimal if any social accountability along the way for the destruction, what are rather dismissed as necessary, if unfortunate casualties in service of progress,

Modernity as such, prepared the theoretical and technical ground for imperialism, supremacism, the conflict with and dovetailing of traditional ethnocentrism and even aboriginal monoculturalism.

Hence, our anti-supremacist position, recentralizing the praxis of delimited group interests, but unlike monoculturalism, recognizing other cultures and unlike traditional ethnocentrism, respecting coordination over conflict, and unlike modernity, respecting the need to coordination of differences, period.

A bottom line comes into play here for our special advocacy of European peoples, who are under attack under the weaponized modernist rubric of anti-racism (“anti-white-grouping” and any discrimination, even non-aggressive, simply necessary to maintain their groups), where they don’t naively fall into its self destructive chain of logic; as it is not only a product of scientism divorced from the relative, practical concerns of praxis, but implicit misdirection by the red caped moral order that is Christianity; which, in turn, is central among many red cape, Manichean (as in trickery) mis-directions deployed to the detriment of European’s more Augustinian (as in concerned with natural problems) nature by the YKW.

What this means is that we look upon the YKW as an out group, not White/European, and pay attention to ways that they might be acting destructively to White/European interests; whether through their genetics in secular form, in diaspora; in Zionism; or through the vehicles of their Abrahamic religions, Islam a sword for them and Christianity, a shield for them and self sacrifice for ours.

Finally, with with this anti-supremacist/anti-imperialist stance, we do not react and we reject Nazism, its “solutions” its divide and conquer, its rigid, no account scientism. In a word, our aim is not to kill an genocide people, our goal is systemic autonomy, our sovereignty.

Position of the site in response to issues of antagonism and dissolution as a result of dereliction of responsibility:

Unionization of the genetic nation, i.e., White Left Ethnonationalism to structure accountability to our relative group interests, social capital, coherence, self correction, agency and warrant of human pervasive ecology; and their coordination as opposed to antagonism to White European boundaries, largely advocated by elitist YKW interests in makeshift coalitions with White right wing sell outs, who take the line of objective merit irrespective of group accountability and White liberals who take the license/licentiousness to avoid accountability for opening group bounds with the altercast of objective merit.

The White Post Modern project thus is one of understanding and utilizing Post Modern ideas as they would be in service of reconstructing White/European group interests, by accountability and self corrective systematization (homeostasis), facilitating autonomy and sovereignty. Whereas the ideas of Post Modernity (as properly understood in White interests) are obfuscated (largely through the discourse control of the YKW) in their true purpose of holding up against the ravages of modernity, the antagonism of traditional ethnocentrism of outgroups, backwards, self defeating “traditions” of our own.

Now, to the superficial and those indoctrinated of the marketing campaign against the left characterology, it may seem as if this platform is opposed to objectivity, facts, pursuit of natural reality, or cross contextual principles and so on; however, that is not the case. Rather, we seek to place objective quests in their useful function, with their relative merit as feedback, at times crucial feedback, against the calibration of our relative group interests and coordination with others in their relative interests; again, that (centralization of praxis) is what the White Post Modern project is about (properly understood).

Now, to the superficial and those indoctrinated of the marketing campaign against the left characterology, it may seem as if this platform is opposed to objectivity, facts, pursuit of natural reality, or cross contextual principles and so on; however, that is not the case. Rather, we seek to place objective quests in their useful function, with their relative merit as feedback, at times crucial feedback, against the calibration of our relative group interests and coordination with others in their relative interests; again, that (centralization of praxis) is what the White Post Modern project is about (properly understood).

White Left Ethnonationalism draws a distinction disingenuously glossed over by antagonists to White (European) peoples; viz, the unionization of our European peoples (genus) and national kinds (species) and coalition thereof. This is opposed to The Marxist internationalist left, which purports to unionize the workers of the world against the nation state, which is to be withered away; or Cultural Marxism, which is unionization of non-White or anti-White peoples and coalitions thereof against White unionization, viz, White Left Ethnonationalsm.

This distinction is disingenuously glossed-over by the marketing campaign against a characterology of “the left” proposed as the grand “problem” to be “solved” by rightism on the part of the YKW in particular, as distortions of left coalitions usually having come by way their tutelage have intersected with their interests as they arouse to greater hegemony than ever in key niches. Thus, they sought to promote rightism (pseudo objectivity), to suggest that they have hegemony by sheer objective merit, and they attempt to build coalition with other right wing elitists, encouraging them to believe that their good fortune is sheer objective as well, and owes no account to the relative, systemic interests of their groups, the direct effects, nor the reflexive effects on one’s own human ecology, that of others, or pervasive ecology.

Thus, if there were this unionization of White Left Ethnonationalism, it would be in position to hold elitists and their exploitation of the genus and species to account. Apparently, the YKW don’t want that (nor do right wing sell outs or disingenuous liberals who take the license/licentiousness).

David Horowitz and Paul Gottfried occupy two axial points of Jewish motivation to promote a marketing campaign against “the left” and characterology thereof, while altercasting manipulable right wing reactionary positions for Whites given intersectionality with the (((progressive stack of PC victim groups))) against their Jewish interests, their need to get ahead of the reaction to NeoConservatism’s Operation Clean Break / Wars for Israel and reaction to the 2008 financial meltdown/ bail-out. 

Freedom From Association: Or slavery, as imposed association implies involuntary contract – slavery, by definition. Supremacism and the implication of inhumane/inhuman force at work – thus, non-negotiative, lose right to be free from harmful retaliation – for the denial of negotiative agency they are attributable as would-be slave master for their imposition, denial of the human status of agentive choice making on the part of their “victim(s).” – credit James Bowery for this articulation.

* Note: We don’t have time for nutty conspiracy nor need for irrelevant speculation, and will rather look upon that as an unwelcome diversion from the important tasks at hand.