John Perkins, Confessions of an Economic Hitman, short documentary
The documentary does a very good job of articulating the right wing’s motive in selling out left ethnonationalism, but takes a wrong turn at the end into a bit of conspiratardism, calling 9-11 a sheer false flag, rather than an opportunity for the YKW behind Operation Clean Break to effect their “project for a new American Century” i.e, maneuvering American military and rigid, unaccountable corporate motives to their interests.
This is a good one too, exploding the myth of GDP being an important measure, since it is not necessarily a calculation of wealth disbursed among individuals but may just mean that a few people are doing extremely well:
(((Black Rock, Larry Fink, Steve Mnuchin))) et al.
<a href=”https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Fink” rel=”nofollow ugc”>(((Larry Fink and Black Rock)))</a>
<a href=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-yXf3lUooE” rel=”nofollow ugc”>Academic Agent provides a good expose of Black Rock, it’s CEO Larry Fink and his cohorts, Mnuchin et al.</a>
Morgoth chases the red cape against green concerns a bit, but a helpful expose otherwise.
…….
The (((Sackler’s))) part in the opium addiction epidemic:
1 October 2021
Although this a rather old story, I place it here and now for a couple of reasons; first being that is instructive in how intransigent and clinging to the (((red cape))) program that right wingers such as Ramzpaul, Styx, Z-Man, Guessedworker, needless to say those who will appear on Fox News among others have been despite its obviousness as a nudge program in the interests of the YKW (and against ours), particularly after 2008, to encourage Whites to join them on the right against an ethnonational left awakening that could threaten their position. I have also placed it here minus the comments, because I did not know where else to put it, as it is more a supportive argument than a piece I want to devote a slider post to.
This story provides a reminder and an example of just how stupidly intransigent the resistance to this obvious observation has been – the red caping of the left, but also the stupid obstruction of the DNA Nations concept; in the comments you will see Matt Parrott, who has been an obstruction to The DNA Nations concept, trying to defend his denunciation; having said it is “wrong at every turn” he adds in comments that “it sucks”, apparently because it bypasses his ego position as the bureaucratic middle man of the right, operating Christian bullshit and gaining rank by kissing the ass of Hitler idolaters, as “we should not bash Adolf Hitler.”
David Mamet’s fraud conservatism
Originally published by DanielS on Thursday, 18 April 2013 06:03.
n considering this comment by ukn_leo
“I have learned so much from reading Leon’s posts, Dan. As someone with natural conservative leanings”…
As someone who has natural conservative leanings as well, I thought a discussion might be useful to move toward a better understanding of what we mean by “conservatism”, and to help European peoples better discern the fraudulent “neo-conservatism” being put across to the public: taking the example of David Mamet’s fraud awakening.
Notice in the clip provided below, the slick, Jewish deception that Mamet, via Hayek, makes with the idea of constraint – to focus on limiting government.
To limit and constrain government is Not a big problem for we true conservatives, but it is not the fundamental point.
The fundamental point of true conservatism is constraint on demographics.
David Mamet is a prominent screen and play write – and very Jewish.
It may be instructive to look at his work from a European person’s perspective. By examining the particular talk posted, we may get a better idea not only of how conservatism is being misrepresented, but also develop a better feel and skill for countering Jews as they operate so confidently and smoothly in an array of verbal misrepresentations.
Besides diverting true conservatism by misdirecting the notion of constraint, notice also in the clip what Mamet does to the notion of accountability: You are there for the goods or you are not – snooze, you lose. That is a convenient position now that his conspefics have amassed such wealth, power and influence from the union of their people. Mamet gives the example that it would be a good idea to end cab driver licensing (We might guess that would end any notion of appeal on its grounds as well). Private drivers will come in there and make deals with pedestrians looking for a ride.
Mamet is putting across a slick, Jewish deception via Hayek, that the primary conservative function of “constraint” is to limit government.
While to limit and constrain government is Not a big problem, it s not the primary issue for we true conservatives, it is not the fundamental point.
The fundamental point of true conservatism is constraint on demographics.
Irrespective, Mamet has proclaimed himself “awakened” to “conservatism” when in fact he has merely awakened to another tool in the Jewish bag of tricks: to promote the fraud “conservatism” of his fellow Jews, Hayek* and Friedman, which is really, of course, hyper-liberalism
* From Wiki on Hayek:
“On his mother’s side, Hayek was second cousin to the philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein. His mother often played with Wittgenstein’s sisters, and had known Ludwig well. As a result of their family relationship, Hayek became one of the first to read Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus when the book was published in its original German edition in 1921. Although Hayek only met Wittgenstein on a few occasions, Hayek said that Wittgenstein’s philosophy and methods of analysis had a profound influence on his own life and thought.[11]”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pIio8Jt7yLw
Update: 21 Dec 2017 –
David Mamet:
I have no interest in going back to liberal arts colleges, unless they are truly liberal in the classical sense, which is to say conservative.
I’m sure that I would not have arrived at this point without that commitment [to Judaism and Israel]; and there is two portions to it, one is a commitment to Israel – when I noticed inescapably that the left had turned against the state of Israel, and that the Israelis were now being treated basically as subhumans, that we Jews, that the Israelis and we Jews by extension, were being treated as subhumans by the left, that is to say to whom the international law and traditional considerations of right and wrong, traditional considerations of mutual responsibility to allies did not apply, that all this could be abrogated by the left because the people involved were Jews, and somehow grasping and criminals…
To turn our backs on Israel is heart-breaking. And it’s time for the Jews to wake up.
Israel has been fighting the battles of the west for 60 years.
The men and women in Israeli, in the armed forces and in the civilians, have been fighting and dying to preserve the Judeo-Christian ethic. As it says in the bible, those who bless Israel will be blessed by me and those who curse Israel will be cursed by me.
The left the left the left…poor Israel, poor Jews
Posted by DanielS on Thu, 18 Apr 2013 06:23 | #
Here is a discussion of Hayek and his influence on Thatcher
http://www.iea.org.uk/blog/there-is-no-such-thing-as-society
Frontline:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mb786mTZVHk
Where it does not deflect from Jewish power and influence, Frontline is not going to be very explicit about it, but neverthless, this two part series does provide some of the nuts and bolts of the 2008 financial crisis.
….
White Ethnocentrism: Can Americans Really Be Brainwashed?
By Dr. Kevin MacDonald, published at V-Dare, 11 Nov 2008
………
Weaponizing History:
Solzhenitsyn’s Two Hundred Years Together Part 1
Spencer Quinn, Counter-Currents, February 2021
Dissidents often struggle with this when discussing the Jewish Question. We want to tell the truth. On the other hand, our message would be much more powerful if only we could omit this inconvenient fact or embellish that disappointing one. As dissidents, we wish to put forth a realistic depiction of Jews, without spite or bias, to uncover their net negative impact on our politics, and, to a lesser extent, our culture. This is the first step to freeing ourselves from the Jewish yoke, so to speak. And if we are telling the truth, then we can afford to show more than one side of the story and still be persuasive.
[…]
Perhaps when confronted with the twin myths of Jewish innocence and victimhood, this information could help convince the uninitiated of the lies and hatred which bolster both. And for the initiated, the knowledgeable, the dissident, perhaps the most trenchant passages in Two Hundred Years Together will arm him or her with the information which could help spark the counter-Semitic revolution that is so desperately needed in the West today.
Immigration World Poverty and Gumballs 2010 – Immigration Doesn’t Work
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCcFNL7EmwY
Private Companies Argument
…….
Dr. Kevin MacDonald discusses Jews & Immigration
For a good understanding of the history of Cultural Marxism and its PC (politically correct) agenda, this video is an excellent summation.
White Ethnocentrism: Can Americans Really Be Brainwashed?
11/25/2008
https://vdare.com/articles/white-ethnocentrism-can-americans-really-be-brainwashed
…………………………………………..
Frankfurt School, Cultural Marxism, Political Correctness, Part 1, Part 2.
While host of this discussion, William Lind, is a fine fellow, the beans are actually spilled by David Horowitz, and you can be sure that he’s doing it to get ahead, i.e., control the opposition – as he will, by depicting “the left” as the enemy, as opposed to good right wingers, including YKW.
A similar important bean spilling venture was undertaken by a Jewish fellow going under the handle of “Frame Games”…
And with similar hopes in mind, that the marketing campaign characterology of “The Left” would hold sway enough for him and fellow tribesmen taking a right wing angle to be exonerated (damage controlled); hence, he conducts these discussions with J.F. Gariepy, a useful idiot, being a right wing reactionary going along with the marketed characterology of “The Left.”
And so there is a caveat with regard to Framegames. As useful as he is in spilling serious beans, he is also trying to deflect the blowback for his people’s antics, firstly attributing it to the characterology of “the left” but also trying to propose yet another red cape, “the diversity industry” (“diversity” being red cape reversal of meaning, re-direction toward the solution that “we don’t want diversity, we want integration and unity as such”). Finally, he tries to propose the pathetic five stages of grieving as the proper response to the antics of his tribe. Having said that, he does spill beans:
Part 1, Perplexing Case of Starbucks w Framegames
Part 2, Perplexing Case of Starbucks w Framegames
Part 3, Perplexing Case of Starbucks w Framegames
The story they burned Part 1: Disparate Impact and The Community Redevelopment Act. Part 2
Marketing strategy ‘unthinging” normal White identity, by contrast to any such identity being supremacy.
Behind the Curtain with Framegames
More Deadly Than War – A Lecture by G. Edward Griffin:
Articulate discussion on the communist strategy toward The United States, even if G. Edward Griffin does afterward (and a bit even in this lecture) venture into some right wing absurdity (i.e., we’re not exactly endorsing his prescriptions across the board); nevertheless, Griffin does express a good handle on this communist revolutionary strategy and with that, the lecture is remarkably prescient given what is happening today with PC reaching hyperbole in BLM riots and so on.