I’ve likened the platform set out here to Airforce Command Control, with Perfect Radar Tracking overview of our Systemic Requirements, Adversaries and Vulnerabilities.
European peoples, as racial genus and ethnic national species, are human ecological systems, in process of homeostasis, dissolution or potential dissolution.
That is a reasonable working hypothesis, as it is also a reasonable working hypothesis to hold that the endeavor to sustain our human ecologies is not only a moral service to our forebears, legacy and the pedestrians at hand; but also provides means to negotiate and help manage other human ecologies along with pervasive ecology.
In this world view, tracking the threat to our systemic homeostasis begins first with Abrahamism, i.e., with its source people and religion and people, i.e., Jewry and then moves right away to the vulnerabilities that White Right wingers and liberals create in reaction, both on the minimally accountable basis of the pseudo objectivism that they appeal to as warrant against the corruption of our moral order (Christianity) introduced by the Jews.
Having cunningly staked out a position in their relative interests among praxis (the social world), they have successfully maneuvered Whites into objectivist reaction – objectivism which puts them in trajectory beyond their relative, systemic interests; where whatever identity they associate with their people is associated with pursuit of pure warrant, if not innocence beyond the guilt trips and trickery of Jewry.
Interestingly, this reactionary basis of pure objectivity below or beyond the relative interests of praxis functions as the base pseudo warrant for both Right Wingers (who may take undue reward on that argument, violating group bounds, despite relative group interests) and Liberals (who may take undo license and licentoiusness on that basis, violating group bounds despite relative group interest) However, this pursuit is low on social accountability, thus low on correctivity, the means of systemic homeostasis and the sovereignty that goes along with it.
A the objectivist reaction seeks warrant beyond (or below) praxis, and is low on accountability and correctivity, it is exceedingly dangerous – markedly in the Christian and Muslim belief in a hereafter, better and more important than this world, which has little to do with concern for this world and biological legacy. Even the liberal objectivists, who may not believe in heaven hereafter narrative, are likely are likely to conduct themselves in a manner demoralizing and disillusioning to enough of the population to be quite dangerous for its lack of accountability and correctivity.
But even where not an immediate threat to the entire planet, these right wingers and liberals are prone, for the rational blindness of their reactionary, objectivist stance to subjective and relative interests to fail to apprehend the Manichean trickery of Jewry (Islam et al); and to naively allow them into the system to “help” provide “solutions” to the problems that they had large part in creating. That is, “solutions” which are actually subversion, faster or slower, of our systemic homeostasis and sovereignty.
If we are to survive and manage ourselves properly, therefore, it is imperative that we understand Post Modernity as White Post Modernity: the project to regain our ethnocentrism enough – i.e., to centralize our praxis as our world view. Not so much, however, as to be unable to appraise other groups correctly and be able to coordinate with them in their differences.
The relative interests of our praxis (group) is the Calibration that we seek to maintain and gauge objectivist facts and truth that is irrespective of our relative interests but none the less necessary Feedback. That we see the Calibration of our people as the sine-qua-non measure and not objective facts irrespective of their utility to us, as the sine-qua-non measure, distinguishes us from the naivete of Modernity.
As opposed to the red caping (which most everybody associates with it) Post Modernity, properly understood, is a project to recentralize and reconstruct our world view through the praxis our group perspective; heremeneutic process and the ideas social constructionism are necessary to facilitate this recentralization and reconstruction – taking back our means of systemic homeostasis from the Modernist, Cartesian estrangement and divide from engagement and joint construction with people.
The concept of unionization, which is the most essential and important concept beneath the idea of the “the left” (not “equality”), is perhaps the most crucial factor that Jewry wants to control and does not want us to have per their red caping of “the left” as somehow, an array of coceptual tools, working hypotheses that cannot be utilized for White Ethnonationalism. Of course these tools can be used as White Left Ethnonationalism, and unlike the utter nonsense of the characterology of the left, marketed by Jewish interests to White Right wing reactionaries, saying its necessarily divorced from truth and reality, we can use the Heideggerian hermeneutic concept in corrective liberation from mere facticity and Cartesian estrangement to maintain our group calibration; and we can sustain it, structure its means of accountability, correctiveity, thus homeostasis and sovereignty with the concept of unionization; no difficult psychology or fancy incentive about it; that all comes along with the practicality of it.
Take note that in this White Post Modern concept of unionization, the union classification is about whole group – holistic – the Whole race as genus, is the White Class, while the ethnonations form whole classes of themselves, not divided by working class and others, as in the Jewish divide and conquer scheme of Marxism.
Rather, differences among and between groups are treated as qualitative niche differences having a position to facilitate systemic homseostasis.
White Post Modernity properly understood thus, is in position, on guard to the ethnocentrism and pseudo objectivism of others that may do harm to our systemic homeostasis; we also manage our own ethnocentrism and objectivism within this calibration and means of coordination.
We are in a position of vigil and comfortable buffer, both; on guard against potential elite betrayal and rank and file betrayal. And, of course, on guard against impositions and destructions of outside groups, whether by means of their elite power, biopower, some ideology, whatever.
Jewish interests, with their penchant for Manichean trickery and will to world dominance, particularly as threatened by Whites, do not want Whites to understand Post Modernity – its purpose, concept and means to systemic homeostasis and sovereignty – and have red caped it to deceive Whites into systemic dissolution. In fact, they have red caped all ideas that would be crucial to White systemic homeostasis, not just Post modernity.
This might not be as important if Jewish biological patterns had not come through a process of selection called horizontal transmission, where their more ordinary, situated and accountable types had been killed off as host populations perceive parasitism, while the most virulent types escape across border, to a new host, if not with the loot, then with additional virulence having been defacto selected for:
Thus, it is a biological pattern, even where not individual cases occupying the most elite positions in this lifespan they are biologically disposed to move into ten or so elite niches over which Jewry now has disproportionate influence if not hegemony: religion, economics, politics, academia, media, law & courts, business (incl. international, foundations, trusts), military and technology, organized crime.
As I like say – because it makes eminent sense – ever since 2008, Jewry has generated a marketing campaign against a characterology of “the left” in order to dissuade Whites from the Leftist idea of unionizing as a people; inasmuch organizing our power, structuring accountability and in position to hold Jewry and traitors to account – indeed our right wingers and liberals who take the bait of this campaign, forced into to the no account reactionary objectivist identity for the flattery of whatever luck they have, are a huge problem; and this is a huge, important difference from the “dissident right” or whatever other kind of right, or neither right nor left or third positionist bullshit, that Jewry wants us to react into. This right wing identify or aspects therefore, create no account rigidity for them to manipulate and maneuver, holes for them to infiltrate, leading to our systemic dissolution directly if not through runaway overcorrection.
I tried to make this short, but this is the best I can do in summing up this life saving platform.
But just a few more words.
And so from the perspective of our union – union of unions, as it were – the union of unions being the genus of the European race, while the ethnicities of the Europeans and their nations being the species – the perspective of our radar tracking in the systemic homeostasis of our unions and vigilance on antagonists, moves in hermeneutic survey thus:
Although there is no necessary set order…
It typically first surveys Jewish positions, biological patterns and elite niche rule structuring as it is adverse to our interests in systemic homeostasis…
But it might just as well start with the misguided and misguiding notions of our right wingers and liberals for the reasons stated above.
At any rate, for the foreseeable future, these are our two biggest problems, and the first two check points on radar tracking system.
Note that our liberals are people who would open our borders and bounds, thus they may be complicit with the Marixst international anti-national left or Cultural Marxist anti White left, or with other people’s left, but they are Not White Left Ethnonationalal.
After the radar surveys Jewish patterns and elite niches, then White right wingers and liberals, it moves on to whatever other places on our systemic accountability that might be breeched by other interests; certainly Muslims are a likely third candidate for concern; blacks, their biopower and hyper-assertiveness must rank high in priority of concern…while Mulatto supremacism looms constantly on the horizon. The Chinese and other Asians do not exactly hold our well being as their utmost concern; therefore must occupy a constant place on our vigil, etc… and so the hermeneutic survey goes… and I’ll tell you what, this world view makes consistent sense. I have not been confronted with a single argument that has persuaded me against it. This, The White Left Ethnonatioanl Perspective, is the best and most practical to look after our own and coordinate with others.
A reminder underscoring its practicality is its innocence: while we will defend ourselves, imperialism, supremacism and looking to kill people is not our goal. Hence, it has the most likely prospects for maintaining our people and coordinating with others.
Furthermore, this makes the working hypotheses of our check points regarding the various proposed antagonists much more valid as the hypotheses are not only prosed as correctable, but can be corrected as no irreversible conclusion is enacted.
Now, while I have tried but not succeeded altogether in keeping this post short, I will make up for that by adding a feature to the site. To make up for the fact that there are many inordinately long posts, I will put up short posts, or rather, an idea of the day, that plucks out just one shortly stated but important idea to focus on – something like “the idea of the day.” This should encourage readers to move back into the longer posts at their leisure to flesh out the ideas.
Unionization will structure accountability and provide incentive structure as well.
The issue of citizenship is key, its privileges, responsibilities, means of ostracism for violating borders and bounds is sustained against liberal runaway by the unionizing means thus.
John Perkins does a fine job of clarifying the right wing part in the globalist antagonism to ethnonationalism (requires the fleshing out of the JQ components just as the David Duke’s require these John Perkins components).
John Perkins, Confessions of an Economic Hitman, short documentary
The documentary does a very good job of articulating the right wing’s motive in selling out left ethnonationalism, but takes a wrong turn at the end into a bit of conspiratardism, calling 9-11 a sheer false flag, rather than an opportunity for the YKW behind Operation Clean Break to effect their “project for a new American Century” i.e, maneuvering American military and rigid, unaccountable corporate motives to their interests.
This is a good one too, exploding the myth of GDP being an important measure, since it is not necessarily a calculation of wealth disbursed among individuals but may just mean that a few people are doing extremely well:
(((Black Rock, Larry Fink, Steve Mnuchin))) et al.
(((Larry Fink and Black Rock)))
Academic Agent provides a good expose of Black Rock, it’s CEO Larry Fink and his cohorts, Mnuchin et al.
(((Larry Fink and Black Rock)))Academic Agent provides a good expose of Black Rock, it’s CEO Larry Fink and his cohorts, Mnuchin et al. … …. …
Morgoth chases the red cape against green concerns a bit, but a helpful expose otherwise. …except for a few other problems that come along with Morgoth and Academic Agent; viz., they get maneuvered to act into the (((marketing scheme))) against a characterology of “the left” despite being aware of sub-marketing schemes (in this case, “operation red meat”). Morgoth and Academic Agent function within that controlled box, against, “the left”, and show their inexperience as Johnny come latelies to racial advocacy and the J.Q. Both are maneuvered into the stupid angle, as such, falsely believing that it is important to deconstruct Hitler/Nazism as a terrible association. They show themselves unaware of the prior DECADES in which WN has been saddled with this albatross, stigmatizing, dividing to conquer our cause. In fact, Academic Agent proposes this stupid meme of “the boomer truth regime” in which boomers deem Hitler the worst evil and that this claim must be undone. Well, in the Jewish controlled media of recent decades, yes, Hitler was considered the greatest evil; but the platforms (purporting) to represent WN in recent decades, have in fact been saddled with a right wing boomer “truth regime” imposing (they purport to be looking for the truth) the near opposite, to where Hitler/Nazism are considered, if not on the right side of WWII, then prosecuting a war that the west was guilty of starting/entering; opening the door for radioactive association and divide and conquer. In fact, in that podcast, you can hear Academic Agent and his interlocuters having a laugh about holocaust subjects. Come now, there is a difference between not being burdened by guilt and missing the important fact of it being unnecessary to identify with the vast, overcompensating reaction of Hitler/Nazism. Morgoth apparently has no qualms about teaming up with Mark (“my favorite book is Mein Kampf”) Collett.
Ramzpaul too, shows his lack of familiarity with this problem for WN for decades now, as if the association is no big thing because they are going to call everyone a Nazi anyway. No they are not and there are true believers strategically positioned (e.g., Warren Balough for another example) and distinguishing themselves from those who are falsely accused. Ramzpaul may not be paying attention to this, Academic Agent might not be aware of the decades in which WN has been saddled with the Hitler/Nazism albatross, but it is big, negative association, which should be clearly rejected, because there are true believers and agent provocateurs embedding themselves to the detriment of WN (even Ramzpaul’s side-kick, Sasha, says she came to these issues by way of Mark Collett); it is no problem to clearly reject Nazism and underscore the fact that it divided and destroyed over 50 million Europeans, that it is legitimately stigmatic and yet, they try to say its no big deal (Ramzpaul cites David Irving as “objective” hisotry which he enjoys … I imagine he likes Pat Buchanan as well).
While not unearthing anything particularly new, Gregory Hood (Kevin DeAnna) is very articulate, in this case, in discussing the “collapse of American culture”:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pmdXwoT0YQ
He does well to criticize the typical boomer take that “communism” is THE enemy, what with BLM, for example, being backed by dozens of major corporations.
The weakest point is his failure to understand social constructionism proper; here, he does chase the (((red cape)))…
That may be in part to his being under the wing of Jarod Taylor. It may also explain why he does not address the J.Q. directly; but he may just be playing it safe, which is understandable.
Kevin MacDonald thinks this is good:
Richard McCulloch says:
April 20, 2021 at 2:53 pm
Today’s verdict in the Chauvin trial, and how it is generally seen by Whites compared to non-Whites, might be a good illustration of the difference between individualist, objective, analytical and rule-based concepts of fairness and justice on the one hand versus collectivist, subjective, holistic and contextual perceptions on the other. It is the latter version of justice that has won, and the former Western version going back to the Anglo-Saxons and even Greece and Rome that has been overthrown.
Reply
Kevin MacDonald
says:
April 20, 2021 at 4:17 pm
Absolutely!
This shows that MacDonald is going with the absurd notion that there is a strictly White way of doing things, objective, individualistic, etc, and there is “THE Left’s” way of doing things. As opposed to this being a marketing campaign characterology of what Jews do with “the left” in exaggerated, anti White deployment, while encouraging right wing reaction in objectivism as it suits them.
What the Jews are doing in this misdirection of the naivete of a Kevin MacDonald, is staving-off White Post Modern corrective, which would recalibrate our people (praxis) as the delimited center of world view, while Cartesian, objective queries are to be demoted from the center to feedback to be gauged against the relative interests of our calibration in praxis. This re-arrangement (an overcoming of naivete) would contribute to the accountability and correctivity that would correspond to our systemic homeostasis.
You don’t have to read an ought into this, the left corresponding with unionization of a people to afford boundary and accountability, as in an adjustment to set group interest (Praxis) as calibration while re-setting objective, individualism, etc.as feedback, but it will leave the system vulnerable to dissolution, subversion and runaway ..short on accountability and correctivity as it were.
Praxis is not jargon. I use the word to reclaim it form the Marxists and bring it back to our forbear, Aristotle.
In line with what Heidegger calls “the wisdom of the language.”
praxis:
I use this word to reclaim it from the Marxists as ours, an Aristotelian term.
In line with Heidegger’s wisdom of the language….
Praxis contains “Axis” – pivotal turning point.
Praxis centralizes – as in centralizing our world view through the relative interests of the delimited social group. This is at the heart of the post modern turn of Heidegger or any philosopher worth his salt.
Praxis contains the word practical, as in concerns of phronesis – practical judgment (necessary to negotiate the social world, with its agency to change and reflexive effects that make the kind of lineal rigor of physics envy inpractical) as to relative concerns in interactive relation and its reflexive effects.
Praxis contains the multi spokes of concern requiring attention in managing and turning concern of systemic management of the group boundaries and homeostasis. Jews may be problem number number one, but is it our traitors and misguided ones? another time blacks? another time Muslims? Another time Christians? Another time feminists? Another time traditional women? Another time the scientistic? Another time NeoNazis?
I’m coming to an additional problem of MacDonald’s perspective.
Germanophilia which lends too much sway for Nazism and too little respect for non-German parts of Europe.
I’ve heard it said that Germany is analogous to the “heart” of Europe. They are, rather, like the cerebral cortex, logical and capable of following logics rigorously, but bereft of judgment and homeostasis, prone to runaway if not sufficiently valanced with other “parts of the body corpus”, i.e., other European Nations to provide buffering and homeostatic correctivity in judgment – e.g., whether it be Hitler or Merkel.
Making Germany all important, as an idiot like Tom White would do, and as MacDonald inclines, contributes to the already Germanophilia bordering on NeoNazi laden WN of the US.
You’ve got the Erik Striker and Mike Enoch leading people astray that way……
Warren Balogh and Emily Youcis spewing this crap about how good and misunderstood that Hitler was. Hitler wasn’t a war monger who killed millions of Europeans, including Germans, for his hair brained plans?… with the dumb strawman “that people think Hitler wanted to take over the world.” Nobody thinks that. Those who look into it realize that he wanted to take over up to the Urals – bad enough. And anybody in the path of his plans for lebensraum be damned, even when their nations were against Jews and the Soviets.
GW also contributed to this Germanophilia by trying to make sublime Jan the White Uniter’s wish to unify the European cause pf our White Nationalisms – to him, at the time, observing the correct requirement to put Hitler behind – asking how we could vivify our common cause by understanding how Hitler inspired his masses….
Carolyn Yeager “could not stop” giggling at my perplexed revulsion over GW’s stupidity.
This failure to take the White post modern turn, to place praxis and our relative interests as the central calibration of our world view, while not relegating Cartesian, objective queries to feedback that needs to be gauged against practical interests, is the epistemological blunder of Hitler that GW stupidly tried to deny.
Since some people can’t recognize the obvious, lets repeat: Hitler was not particularly concerned for non-Germans, attacked them and got millions of Whites (including Germans) killed as a result; while stigmatizing the nationalist cause with his imperialist, supremacist brutality.
Trying to promote Hitler and improperly associate it with White Nationalism creates divide and conquer among Whites, while creating stigma and mistrust among decent non-Whites ….those non-Whites who don’t care about millions of Whites getting killed for Hitler’s epistemological blunder might indeed think Hitler was cool.
If it doesn’t make you sick when somebody asks, “what are we conserving?”, think about it for three seconds: We are conserving our genetics and everything good that goes along with it for F’s sake!
Interesting that in a few frames around the 12:00 min mark of this DW Documentary, “The Life of the Super Rich in Central Africa”, the sun has been shaped into a Star of David.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KaPLylJk89w