The issue is with right wingers and liberals as they are being played by Jews.
… as the inherent instability of their position in it’s purported warrant is taken to be beyond the social accountability and systemically stabilizing correctivity of praxis.
STEM Xer conduits of the right wing boomer cancer to subsequent generation internet bubble pipe-line.
It is an unfortunate part of this, therefore, that when I am forced to address one right wing expression, such as Nazism, that its proponents, such as Tanstaafl, exacerbated by his STEM tendency to look for “the one thing” that breaks/links the circuit” and false, absolute binary either/ors (unlike the reality of praxis) can double down in playing into the altercast, depicting anti-Nazism as “my big bugger bear”, to use his term, like it is my own myopic obsession; and my looking not just at Jews but at holes, vulnerabilities in our philosophical system as my being like Jared Taylor, trying to let Jews in and off the hook; when in fact, I am concerned to shore up our system (which unlike Jared Taylor does not include Jews; and does see them as being in profound adversarial position); but since I like and advocate all European peoples and their national sovereignty; and most importantly from my position, our coordination, it seems rather obvious that I should not have to deal with Nazism at all, of course would rather not, as it is bound to stir up conflict between Europeans, whether by trolls or by true believers – neither of whom I should have to deal with: it should be pretty obvious to anyone who cares about European/White peoples that we are ALL under attack in anti-racism; and that trying to redeem Hitler and Nazism is not a good idea. It is beyond impractical. As if its association with ethnonationalism hasn’t been stigmatizing enough. Trying to redeem and deny its genocidal supremacism and imperialism is not going to allow us to build trust, get along, coordinate and build alliance among our European race and it is not going to be practical in coordination with other races either. In my frustration and annoyance at having to deal with this, what I should be able to put aside, the Nazi trolls and the true believer then, like Tanstaafl is wont to depict my frustration and efforts to put Nazism quickly behind as my being on the other side of this false / either or, fooled or in league with the Jews; whereas he wants to believe that he and only the Nazi kind, recognize the significance of Jewry as a mortal threat.
(((They Look huWhite to Me!)))
Boomer Jared Taylor, one of the most prominent figures in White racial advocacy, has endeavored to carve out a niche of right wing White racial advocacy which deflects blame from Jewish power and influence and tries to depict them as belonging in our White advocacy group as much as possible – “they look huWhite to me” – as he has infamously said.
Perhaps he is not merely “trying to do that”, but earnestly believes that he is being so sublime in his right wing Objectivist purity spiral that he does not see them as particularly organized in their Relative interests, that they are, in good part, innocent of any pattern which would be proposed to hold sway over their biological trajectory.
In his purported Objectivity, which sure does rather seem motivated to see innocence in Jewish pattern (and wouldn’t that be nice if they really were on our side and not, indifferent, where not against us), he moves beyond focus on the Relative group interests of Jews in conflict with ours as a source of our problems and promotes a theory instead that the problem is largely in our native European psychology, viz. our “pathological altruism.”
For some of those heavily focused on the blame of Jewish power and influence for our circumstance as Whites, such as Alex Linder, this is contemptable, and this sort needs to be pushed out of White advocacy as they are missing and misrepresenting the source of our problems entirely – they are running misdirection for the enemy. Since I have not been implicated by Alex as being overly aligned, sympathetic (something like that) with Jared Taylor’s view, I can leave discussion of him aside
However, I do need to address the fellow traveler in Alex Linder’s view, i.e., STEM Xer, Tanstaafl, who did rather try to implicate me as being overly aligned, sympathetic (something like that) with Jared Taylor’s position when I attempted to defend Professor MacDonald for exploring the pathological altruism theory; while I understand that this is an angle which is inarticulate and insufficient for its psychological unit of analysis, it is not entirely wrong to try to look for where we, as Whites, are going wrong, why we are not better at defending ourselves. Certainly MacDonald can’t be accused of trying to put aside Jewish antagonism as Jared Taylor had; it is not as if I was trying to defend Jared Taylor.
I do, in fact, have an articulate explanation, a perfect radar tracking system, I like to liken it to – one which includes check points for us to look after in our systemic interests, infinitely better than “pathological altruism’, while at the same time maintaining key check points of Jewish power and influence, not removing them from blame, but Tanstaafl would not hear of it (more on that later). He said that he looks upon Jewry as a mortal threat; apparently suggesting that I do not take them seriously enough, and he alleges further that I use obfuscatory jargon – he’s not going to accept any more of that, as I already “write so much.” He claims further that my logic is poor; and that I have one big bugaboo, the Nazis, whom I should not be against, according to him – he wanted to make it clear to me that he has no problem with Hitler.
You see, while Tanstaafl is without proper philosophical bearing, he is nevertheless on heightened alert for anyone who might be misleading his folk, particularly keen as such to sniff out anyone who he thinks may be falling under the sway of Jews or their shabbos goy, like Jared Taylor, who apparently brought forth the notion of “pathological altruism” into circles of “White advocacy.”
And promoting this idea is not something in Jared’s past, that he has moved beyond.
In fact, to promote his theory of “pathological altruism“, which puts blame for the condition of Whites squarely on their own shoulders, Jared Taylor found occasion recently when being interviewed by the jolly Edward Dolton, who so Duttishly complies with the Jewish marketing scheme for White identity to be right wing, conveniently enough maneuvered there by Jewry to deflect from Jewish hegemony, right wing and liberal complicity and against any challenge to it which might come from “the left” – the accountability and systemic correctivity of White Left Ethnonationalism, that is.
Hearing this latest gambit of “pathological altruism” from Jared Taylor, one can almost – almost – understand Tanstaafl’s STEM x er myopic, paranoic reaction to me.
However, I don’t worry about his being able to distract too much from what Jewish interests are up to; it’s too obvious for even him to cover up. And I can’t for the life of me see how anyone who takes the least note of my efforts can construe me as being naïve to Jewish power and influence…. although people like Tanstaafl and his cohorts will try; therefore, I must look at their motives, because they are not looking honestly at what I bringing to bear.
Lets put right wing Boomer Jared Taylor behind, so that we may address the remiss of Xer’s and other generations who only serve to demonstrate the inherent instability of the right by over correcting as they do against red capes of the left, and by going further into their own right wing purity spirals also in reaction to his kind of right wing purity spiral, intent as they are on establishing absolute warranting principles above or below the correctivity of praxis … it is for the Xer who knows, to relieve the ping pong between Jared Taylor and Tanstaafl.
Note: I’ve corrected the following paragraph, as the way I’d written was very sloppy with regard to my own perspective, even. That is, I’d written the paragraph as if to suggest that the only problem with Jared Taylor’s outlook was that he was Jewish friendly; otherwise about as good as a White advocate can be.
I don’t know why I wrote it that way as it has never been my assessment of Taylor.
In fact, he gets several important things very wrong in the manner of the Boomer rightwingism that this series is set to correct. He gets several things very wrong. I don’t go into that here (for example, I don’t go into the way he goes along with the red cape of social constructionism, “race is just an optical illusion”)… but I do indicate that his kosher friendliness is not the only problem in the paragraph as it is written now. ..Wheew! I don’t know why I wrote it the way I did (tired, perhaps).
Jared is still Jared – he probably does good on balance in his (Boomer Objectivist) White advocacy despite being kosher friendly; again, he is not so bad only because, as indicated above, not even he can cover up the misdeeds of YKW; even while the likes of him and Dutton are being friendly to the kosher marketing perspective, its altercast for White identity and controlled discourse parameters thereof. At least in some recent interviews he’s explicitly addressing Jewish hypocrisy some – here – (a second video of this kind, addressing Zionist hypocrisy, is found below that one here) in terms of their disallowing ethnonationalism for others (viz., Zionism vs European ethnonationalism). However, like Ganucci, diaspora Jews can (with dubious judgment on his part) still be considered part of his own national ingroup provided that they toe/advance the marketing line against “the left.”.
Jared has begun to use the word “corrective”… that’s nice, it marks observation of some positive, sociological influence; and he has taken note of hypocrisy among Jewry, noting Zionists who do not extend the legitimacy of nationalism to Whites: but Jared has not really moved very far in an important way; he still considers European Jews to be (Hu)White; i.e., basically belonging in the same genetic category as Europeans and belonging to the European advocacy group provided that they toe the marketing line (against “the left”). This is extremely naïve; and it goes against the biological/genetic distinction between peoples that he is otherwise at pains to emphasize.
While those who take the right wing purity spiral so far in the focus on Jews that they do not see blacks as a problem are infuriating for their naivete, Jared is at the other extreme; we might be relieved that he has the courage to focus on blacks as antagonistic, his unwillingness to grant proper weight to the antagonism of Jewish power and influence to Whites is infuriating naivete.
It is as if Jared is purporting to be in such a purity spiral of right wing objectivism, to be so sublime that not only does he have the clear vision that Whites do not have to see their relative group interests as they should for their “pathological altruism”, but he is going to join them, and altruistically extend patterned innocence to Jews.
Along with Christians, Taylor’s brand of race realist objectivism, inasmuch as it would include Jews in our advocacy group, is one of two other major right wing camps that the platform that I set forth contrasts with and opposes – other than Nazism; that being the third major camp (a dishonorable mention for conspiracy theorists) – which puts the lie to Tanstaafl’s allegation that “Nazism is my big bugaboo.”
In fact, I’d rather not talk about Nazism and WWII at all. I have not the least desire to lay guilt trips on subsequent generation of Germans, and I don’t think that I should have to talk about it very much, as it was another generation, reacting as it did; and we should be able to see clearly now with 20/20 hindsight, what they might not have been able to see then, that we’re better off putting our valiant efforts to cooperation and coordination as European ethnonationalists rather than fighting, just because one nation, in that case Nazi Germany, thought it must reign in supreme imperialism over others.
But because STEM Xer Tanstaafl thinks Hitler was perfectly ok and, in his STEM predilection, must see “the one problem” breaking the circuit, he wants to believe, true to his keen focus that just like a Jew, or defender of Jews, my only concern is Nazism.
However, it is not simply Nazism that I must counter from our own ranks, but the full array of right wing reactionary positions, for their inherent instability, beyond the accountability and correctability of praxis as they are – you can see why people would be frightened by Jared Taylor’s socially gauche and deterministic thinking, short on social accountability as it is, even if he is “against Nazism and nice to Jews.”
The White radar tracking device, looks first for problems in its scan for
Jewish biopatterns / and elite niche power and influence and…
White Right Wing and Liberal Complicity, both stemming form objectivist grounds susceptible to naivete and disingenuous exploitation.
But I guess when you are as focused on one thing as STEM x er computer nerd Tanstaafl is, intent on false binaries to satisfy your STEM urge to parse out the one break in the link, you don’t see the systemic pattern than I’m attending to, our sovereignty scanning over in check points, not at all in remiss in taking Jews seriously enough, in setting them outside our group and foremost as anything on our radar tracking screen of problematic issues.
And with that, I am definitely not on Jared Taylor’s side, but rather dutifully attending to vulnerabilities, the holes in our system that allow for enemy infiltration, subversion, manipulation and maneuvering of our people against our interests.
Given that, for attempt to put aside the platform that I set forth (which is on entirely superior epistemological grounds) for his Hitler/Nazi redemptionist idea that the Jews are practically the only matter that we have to attend to, we’ve got to address a few more things about the STEM xer conduit of right wing boomer bullshit, Tanstaafl, before we move on to other Boomers and the heirs of their foolishness in subsequent generations.
Note: I’ve corrected the following paragraph, as the way I’d written was very sloppy with regard to my own perspective, even. That is, I’d written the paragraph as if to suggest that the only problem with Jared Taylor’s outlook was that he was Jewish friendly; otherwise about as good as a White advocate can be.
I don’t know why I wrote it that way as it has never been my assessment of Taylor.
In fact, he gets several important things very wrong in the manner of the Boomer rightwingism that this series is set to correct. He gets several things very wrong. I don’t go into that here (for example, I don’t go into the way he goes along with the red cape of social constructionism, “race is just an optical illusion”)… but I do indicate that his kosher friendliness is not the only problem in the paragraph as it is written now. ..Wheew! I don’t know why I wrote it the way I did (tired, perhaps).
Jared is still Jared – he probably does good on balance in his (Boomer Objectivist) White advocacy despite being kosher friendly; again, he is not so bad only because, as indicated above, not even he can cover up the misdeeds of YKW; even while the likes of him and Dutton are being friendly to the kosher marketing perspective, its altercast for White identity and controlled discourse parameters thereof. At least in some recent interviews he’s explicitly addressing Jewish hypocrisy some – here – (a second video of this kind, addressing Zionist hypocrisy, is found below that one here) in terms of their disallowing ethnonationalism for others (viz., Zionism vs European ethnonationalism). However, like Ganucci, diaspora Jews can (with dubious judgment on his part) still be considered part of his own national ingroup provided that they toe/advance the marketing line against “the left.”.