YKW bump-up in hegemony circa 2008 and intersectionality necessitates a marketing campaign characterizing “THE LEFT.”
Millennials may not be aware of this because they believe that they’ve been witnessing a breakthrough in their interests, and the right wing Boomers have their casual take on the red caping of left wing social organization confirmed, making them feel like experts as they color in the coloring book handed them by a YKW marketing campaign to help to create instant “experts” among the Millennials.
However, as reaction to (((Neo-Con))) wars for Israel (“Operation Clean Break” sought to use American military to effect regime change in the nations around Israel to make them Israel friendly – removing Iraq’s Saddam Hussein was Israel’s first concern) began to gather logical force along with reaction to reactions to the absurdity of Political Correctness, particularly where it intersected with the interests of the PTB, i.e.., in large part the YKW, damage control and a resurrection of the (((Paleocon))) end of controlled opposition became necessary for the YKW.
Former Left-Wing radical, David Horowitz, had his personal reasons along with the general intersectionality against his people, to do damage control and turned-in an excellent expose to William Lind, describing “Cultural Marxism”, the origin of PC in the Frankfurt School, which, observing that the White American working and middle class were too comfortable to wage Marxist class revolution, changed the advocacy of revolutionaries from working class to non-White or anti-White groups and coalitions thereof against Whites as a classification.
But particularly with the 2008 subprime mortgage meltdown the greater than ever YKW hegemony in 7-9 niches came exposed to intersectional criticism and Paul Gottfried in particular, realized that damage control needed to be done and the other controlled opposition, (((Paleoconservatism))), needed to be resurrected and sexed-up for a younger generation.
The reason for the deceit…
It is commonly understood that Neo Conservatism is a Jewish movement in origin, espousing international aggression for the sake of Israeli interests; it came to heights of opportunity for its wars for Israel after the fall of the Soviet Union. Its originators were Trotskyists, Leo-Strauss and Irving Kristol; its economic and popular roots in The Vienna School of Logical Positivism, which tried to faithfully realize Wittgenstein’s attempt at a foundational ontology in the Tractatus Logico Philosophicus; in turn, giving berth to the Vienna School of economics with Hayek and von Mises, the so-called objectivist (really subjectivist) philosophy of Ayn Rand and the magic hand economics being advanced by Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan, through the repeal of the Glass-Steagall act to the point of the mortgage bust of 2008.
In the meantime, egregious YKW anti-racist programs such as “Disparate Impact” had been weaponized Lockeatine prohibition of White Classification to its sine qua non – i.e., rupturing any capacity for White classification and discrimination thereupon, even if in sheer defense.-
In the face of intersectionality with their more than ever hegemony and its evident culpability in destruction of society and White interests in particular, Paul Gottfried went to work on damage control by sounding the need for a re-vamped Paleo Conservatism, an “Alternative Right.”
Paleoconservatism is a Jewish controlled opposition concept that begins with Frank Meyer. It prescribes a “fusionism” of Judeo-Christianity, The American Constitution and its Enlightenment values – i.e., a fusionism of elements that don’t fuse very well, but Americans being used to these ingredients, they could be sold on it; the premier example being Ronald Reagan, a protégé of Frank Meyer. Besides its chief proponent, Paul Gottfried, prominent non Jews Patrick Buchanan, Joe Sobran and Sam Francis came along with this program. However, by the mid 90s, William F. Buckley and the National Review’s philo-Semitism had beaten any corrective measures and resistance to Jewish over-compensation that existed in Paleoconservatism and it gave way to the Neo Con program in the 1990s and (Operation Clean Break: using American Military to effect Israel friendly regime change in the nations surrounding Israel_ through the Bush jr. administration in the 2000s and into the Obama regime with the assassination of Gaddafi.
But with the subprime mortgage crisis of 2008, in particular, it was already high time and the likes of Paul Gottfried were getting antsy to get a new controlled opposition operation in order.
The YKW needed to keep White identity identified with The Right, in fact where they would be in alignment with Jewish interests on the right, especially now that Jewish niche hegemony is in greater power and influence than ever.
Otherwise, the intersectionality of matters together with growing awareness of where the problems of White societal destruction were coming from would lead to some form of White Left Ethnonationalism, the kind proposed here:
Which would propose effective unions of White people (really, unions of our people, not of trades in particular) and coalitions thereof, which would then begin to have the power and leverage to hold to account those who were screwing them over; in fact they would be able to vocalize and take action against those who were fucking them over:
Number one, of course, would be Jewish power and influence as exercised through 7 – 10 elite niches (money; religion; politics, media; academia; law/courts; international business; crime; NGO’s, foundations and trusts; military/industrial/medical technology), along with their bio-pattern; the YKW encourage complicitness with right wingers – problem 1a observed from the perspective of White Left Ethnonationalism are our traitors – the YKW encouraging them to emphasize their “objective merit” for their success and non-accountability to their group, as such – primed and paid off by the YKW for betraying White group interests; and pretty much the same thing with liberals – they are encouraged with the same objectivist argument, that they are free to do as they please, to rupture group bounds and accountability thereof on pseudo natural, objective grounds, and given this enhanced license and licentiousness by the YKW’s cultural Marxism and the weaponized liberalism of Lockeatine civil rights.
The Marketing Campaign
With the possibility of Whites marshalling the intersectionality of awareness and opposition to the greater than ever hegemony of Jewish power and influence with the 2008 subprime meltdown, Paul Gottfried called upon his fellow Paleocons to come up with an “Alternative Right” for people, particularly White people, to identify with against afflictions of political correctness and the left. As the prior leader of the Paleocon’s “National Policy Institute”, Sam Francis, had passed away, fresh leadership was sought; after a brief interim of another head, Richard Spencer was tapped and mentored to some extent by Gottfried (and Bowden and Regnery) on stewarding a new generation of reactionaries into right-wing identity against, “the left.”
With Richard Spencer, Paul Gottfried’s call for an “Alternative Right” took a loose form in cooperation with Regnery publishing and its preferred political angles. Their revised Paleoconservative Alt-right entailed something like a “tentosphere”, that is, a tent of tents, each tent featuring, in fact, veritably requiring some salient, right wing anti-social feature that members of that tent adhered-to despite social stigma. Thus, you would have the standard Paleocon crown with their affinity for the contradiction of the US Constitution, its Enlightenment values along with their Christianity – socially stigmatic because it makes absolutely no sense, is obsequious to the point of self and group destruction. Then there was a new addition, the right wing Jewish tent. This was called “The Alt Lite”, stigmatic because you had Jews circulating among dedicated anti-Semites and ostensibly working against the conventional liberalism of their Jewish brethren., However, they were strategically places among the other tents, including nutty conspiracy theorists, the scientistic reactionary who could not get over modernity and were determined to chase after red cape misrepresentations of post modernity and finally, of course, the Nazis, with their epistemological blunder of natural fallacy.
With America’s PC beleaguered White demographic being overwhelmingly German and second most Irish, they are a market disposed to literature overly sympathetic to the Nazi perspective in their reactionary state. Their obvious social stigma also provided a ready circuit breaker if White identity was getting too far in response to Jewish power and influence.
By the end of Obama’s second term, the primary concern of Israeli and diaspora interests was getting out of the Iran Deal. Thus, the Jewish tent, :”the Alt Lite” was assiduously at work to put Donald Trump into the White house for that explicit purpose – to undo the Iran Deal.
They needed to overcome the decades old article of faith among radical White Nationalists, that there was not a dime’s worth of difference between the Republican or Democratic Party when it comes to White interests. And indeed, while it has shaken out that Whites were not as bad off with a Trump presidency – it bought us some time and Supreme Court Justices maybe not as bad) and we would have been better off with his re-election (what could be worse than Hillary or Biden/Kamala – no brainer) my own focus has been the meta-game (heads they win/tales you lose that the YKW were playing. They would have been ok with either Hillary or Donald, but much preferred Donald (yes, Brutus, Donald was part of the YKW plan) because he would undo the Iran Deal whereas Hillary was part of the administration that implemented it.
Without being 1,000 percent sure, the likes of Mike Enoch and his TRS network has the hallmarks of having been handed a mandate and a portfolio from a marketing campaign to take the Gottfried-Regnery-Spencer concern of revamp Paleoconservatism to an Alternative-Right. Enoch was apparently told to spare no outrage in order to get ahead of those susceptible to be overly Nazi sympathetic – be as outrageous as you need, with Holocaust denial, gas-chamber jokes, you name it – we have all kinds of memes for you: if people object to your swastika’s and stiff arm salutes, call them “optics cucks” because we (wink) understand (nod) that Hitler and Nazi Germany were really right and good, but (next meme) “normies” will never understand that, so play it cool with the “optics.”
Bad optics is a meme that can also be deployed by more traditional paleocons to discuss bad representation of the “underlying truth” of Christianity and America first (i.e., paleoconservative “fusionism”).
Let’s talk Matrix to the normies to bring them around – more memes against the characterology of “The Left”, these “Social Justice Warriors” (how horrible that anyone would want social justice now that Jews are on top of everything) who have uphold impossibly anti-natural concepts and invariable seek the equally impossible “equality” of peoples.
Ingratiate yourselves to the reactionaries, steer them away from any socially responsible, accountable, leftist type organization and advocacy and persuade these people (especially this vast German/Irish demographic) to vote for Trump so that the Iran Deal can be undone. With that accomplished we can invoke the circuit breaker, Mike Enoch initiating a few stiff arm salutes to Richard Spencer, as he “hails” Trump’s victory. After that, we can implode the whole Alt-Right project with “Unite the Right” Charlottesville (idiotic: the thing that the alt right had going for it was that it could not be easily pin pointed). Trump’s sympathy for both sides will allow us to get rid of FED Chair Aspirant Gary Cohn, who can’t tolerate the least bit of sympathy for Nazism while his policies would have served the U.S. and its Mid West industry as opposed to the designs of his internationalist YKW brethren (hence why they were happy to repulse him into resignation – “good people on both sides”).
That’s not to say that the Gottfried inspired marketing campaign would be discontinued. Millennials in particular would never realize how abnormal it was for everyone in the world to be placing all our problems with a characterology of “THE Left.”
And with the Alt-Right and its Nazi tent having served its detonating purpose, shift in focus back to standard Paleoconservatim could be presented as a sane alternative, with Nick Fuentes promoting the Abrahamic yoke of Christianity, and Paul Gottfried pretending that this is so “rebellious”, that your Christianity, that is something that “The Left” just can’t tolerate.
Now, what is it really, that Gottfried is trying to fuck with?
In a word, he is trying to prevent an accurate understanding of Post Modern correctives, as they would serve White systemic interests, our homeostasis and thus, autonomy and sovereignty. Jewish interests have red caped the best ideas of social organization and advocacy and weaponized them against Whites; and these red capes, this internationalist Marxist and anti-White Cultural Marxist left, is red caped as “THE Left” to Whites, with an oxymoronic connotation, as their red capes are wont to have, of “The Left as liberalism.”
Hence Gottfried is wielding two of the most fundamental red capes against White interests, The Left and Christianity
One must suspect that it is not a coincidence that Gottfried was a student of the infamous Cultural Marxist, Herbert Marcuse. And that Gottfried is manifesting damage control and camouflage/crypsis over another end of the parasitic YKW system, seeing Marcus’s destruction to Judeo/Christian values, Gottfried re-proposes the yoking red cape moral order of Christianity as a “solution” to that destruction. Not incidentally, to the superficial observer, “free love” was a central aspect of the hippie movement; but in fact, this was an affectation largely introduced by the likes of Marcuse in order to subvert the true essence of the hippie motives – organic there being – particularly for males – amidst one’s people (midtdasein); now, if by contrast, males from just any which where are free to have at the sex, no holds barred, of your group’s females, that is not Being for males. And yet, that its the kind of popular mis-attribution (free love) associated with the hippie motive by YKW media; and it is very important to clear away these misrepresentations.
But both for the abundance of red cape misrepresentations of post modern thought – thought which is otherwise and at its good purpose meant to re-direct the world view into praxis and social accountability thereby – and for the good fortune of their Boomer situation, which would not want to view their good fortune as such , i.e., due in significant part to the luck of their generational situation – The Boomers, particularly the STEM types, have been more than susceptible to chase the YKW red cape misrepresentations of “post modernity”, they have been intransigently hostile to correctives thereof.