To learn Buddism is to know yourself
To know yourself is to forget yourself
To forget yourself is to identify yourself with the law of the universe – one with the universe
To be one with the universe is to “drop” the notion that you are one with the universe
Along with the body and mind of yourself and others – Dōgen
White Ethnonational Left defined by our interests as opposed to liberal internationalism, Marxist internationalism, or sheer, anti-White cultural Marxism…
Text
Now there’s this thing called The Left, and with characterology, it is seen as a rigid personality type aiming to destroy White people and talented, successful people generally, by promoting artificial concepts in opposition to their natural place and deservingness which would emerge in their truth if the The Left, in its falseness, in its anti-truth, would just leave them alone. The Left is not a fungible political platform implemented by motivated individuals, it is a rigid character type with a rigid mind of its own, of remarkably consistent character, it always denies our truth, our science, makes impossible claims in its capacity to defy and redefine nature in social construction, to deny natural categories, to deny race-real facts and differences with fantastic narrative, until it comes time for their narratives of our historical oppression of others – then somehow race does exist, when its time for the left to mete out blame on the White race that does not otherwise exist according to THE Left. The Left is opposed to objective truth, nature, it always imposes artificial concepts on nature, The Left sees our excellence as privilege, as unjust, exploitative and always demands equality, denying the impossibility of equality and our true merit.
And by the way, this character burst on to the public scene larger than ever in 2008 to attack our good Jewish friends, who are in the same boat, attacked by resentful masses, social justice warriors misguided by the left who can’t see our natural merit.
The Left is always opposed to White people, including our White Jewish allies, it always has sob stories and compassion for the beleaguered to try to manipulate us – it resents nature itself for our success, high I.Q., wealth and the power its endowed us with; and will stop at nothing to hurt us and our Jewish allies in its travesty of nature and truth – defenders of truth and the hard lot of nature as we, the mature, the men and women speaking out on the right, we must stand together and finally do something against the lefties, this beast so consistent and impervious in its demands for equality, in its social justice warring, it alone is responsible for all manner of perversion and destruction – This, The left. We have been lied to about everything by The Left but we are waking up, we are red pilled to the left, as we say. Our friends on the right are waking up as well, our Jewish, black and anti-feminists friends on the right, Christians and pagans alike, folks on the right, ranging from historical revisionists seeing through the lies of the left to our Jewish friends who share a wish for a national homeland and borders against Muslim and Mexican invaders.
Ok, joke time is over, at least you’d think it would be, but we’re talking about right wingers now, whose gullibility, malleability and manipulable in reaction seems to know no bounds, whose propensity for conspiracy theory goes to all nutty speculative lengths, but whose suspicion falters where it should be most obvious and make most common sense.
You’d think it would occur to people concerned with White advocacy, that is to say concerned for advocacy of non-Jewish people of European descent, and their ethnonational bounds, how strange it is that there is this seemingly anthropomorphized political platform called “The Left” – that suddenly took off as THE preeminent problem as of 2008, whereafter seeming everybody in White advocacy and purported White advocacy has joined in unison against this arch enemy – a remarkably agreed upon enemy and an enemy of remarkably consistent character – the left.
..that emerged far and away as the preeminent super villain suddenly, coincidentally, after 2008, and has been more and a more consistently characterized and marketed a stereotype and it should be said, adopted as the super ordinate enemy by purported White advocacy.
Before that time, Political Correctness had been the prevailing term for the enemy camp for almost twenty years – and truth is, that was a far less misleading a term; that’s probably why it has fallen into disuse, our enemies seeking to divert and shelve it as the enemy descriptor, though its proper understanding was indeed captured very well, probably all too well, by William Lind, in his video, the history of political correctness – PC probably cut too close to the bone and needed to be replaced with an enemy seen also opposed to Jewish interests – that enemy being so called – The left.
Frankfurt School: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjaBpVzOohs
Prior to PC, the term “Liberal” also had a bit more currency as the term for the enemy camp, and it was also less misleading a term for the enemy camp than “The Left” – in fact, in essence, probably most descriptive of the function of the advocacy of non-White antagonists and our own traitors as they “open bounds and borders, to liberalize them to formerly out groups as opposed to conserving in-group; but criticizing liberalism carried the unfortunate baggage of positioning oneself as a “conservative” by contrasts, associating one with inactivity, passivity, stodgy, backward, puritanical, weak and ineffectual among the incited burlesque of nature. While it nevertheless has had appeal to a certain audience, criticizing liberalism puts one in funny company, sitting there in the pews next to anti-racist brothers and sisters with bizarrely speculative beliefs in Christ.
None of these types have been penetrating enough to understand that they are conserving nothing but liberal principles – that they are conserving liberalism, adhering to a naive reaction, duped by the disingenuous language games of those who would eradicate or sell out of their EGI and its social capital. Even where these conservatives have some wryness with regard to the J.Q., they are only reconstructing some of its traps set against the relative interest of their EGI – such as Christianity, such as objectivism – whereupon they are made to live up to their rules in purity, Alinsky style, as hyperbolic objective rules against their relative group interests.
Thus, while I understand why those concerned with White interests would find “the left” as its been represented (misrepresented and abused as a concept) repulsive and reluctantly identify as right – despite all the right’s stupidity, inhumaneness, its pseudo objectivity and dodge of social accountability, identifying as such should be a little more than suspicious by now, as a position that our enemies want us to identify with, causing us to ask why they want us associated with the right and by contrast, now, through obvious clues in some of those most determined to join us in seeing THE LEFT depicted as our enemy, why they don’t want us to have a left identity.
And it isn’t as if this anti-left dodge is new. White leadership of the boomer generation, were it at all observant and honest would acknowledge this anti left dodge going on since the days of the John Birch society and National Review, Frank Meyer and his sons Ronald Reagan, Paul Gottfried, Pat Buchanan and Sam Francis – you don’t want to get too deep into any of those politics touching on race, that’s for liberal collectivist lefties, communists, and certainly not touching on the J.Q., that’s for Nazi collectivists.
Generation internet bubble doesn’t have much excuse for falling for it, as it would take just a modicum of research outside of their right wing boomer fed internet bubble; outside of its direct feed by an umbilical chord from boomer generation sell-outs like David Duke, who have even less excuse to not know better, or to pretend not to, and to take the pay off in one way or another, to keep WN associated with the right and against the so called left.
Nevertheless, I have to be very careful to not allow my shift to White left ethnonationalism be pigeonholed as having one source, because that is what these right wingers, especially the STEM types, are going to try to do in order to try to dismiss it, trivialize it or claim it as reinventing their wheel to redirect in their foolish, right wing way.
It is just to say that reinforcing clues leading to the inference of White Left Ethnonationalism have come even through most prolific White advocates, as they have being critical of “the right” –
TT Metzger was the first advocate of Whites to open that gate for me, so to speak, to look critically at the right for his disillusionment with the likes of the John Birch society, the KKK, Christianity and other influences and White right figures… to legitimize punching right in White interests, if need be; furthermore, as a loyal friend of The Order of Bob Mathews and David Lane – one can see not only where he joined commitment to the 14 Words, but also joined in a tributary of skepticism and criticism of the right at the same time, recognizing an incompetent position for White advocacy.
Now, I want you all to consder this: The 14 Words of David Lane are taken, quite correctly, as one of the most, if not the most prominant and important statements of White advocacy. It places David Lane and his words right at the center of White advocacy. Here’s David Making the statement himself:
31:00 – 1:00
David Lane: It is my belief that for any sane White man today, there is no other issue than these fourteen words: We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White children. These fourteen words are the sacred battle cry in the remaining White world…
White advocates could look even to Order member David Lane, the progenitor of this most essential rallying cry, the 14 Words, as providing a sort of permission first of all, to not have to identify as right-wing in their advocacy; and to not be afraid to quote, “punch right”, if that’s what it takes to defend and advocate Whites properly.
Now I want you to hear from David himself, what he had to say about the right and particularly about the White right wing.
57:17 – 59:40
David Lane: The average person in this country has never been exposed to any truths in their entire life.
Meredith: But your literature and literature of like-minded people is out there and some might argue that the average person has been exposed and has discounted it.
David Lane: No, not my literature.
Meredith Viero: Because if it’s the truth, why was…
David Lane; Just a minute. You’ll find no relationship between my literature and what you call, right wing and conservatives.
I consider the likes of a Rush Limbaugh to be the worst enemy my race could ever live to see. And even in the White, I think they call movement, I don’t
You’ll find that even in the White, mythical movement ..I don’t think you’ll find much relationship between what I teach and what they teach.
Meredith Viero: But the ultimate goal is the same, in the White, as you call it, movement,and your
David Lane: Maybe it is. I can’t read the minds of these people. I don’t know why, but…if you could have been privy to what
I’ve been through for 20 years, 30 years total in in the so-called right wing, and seen the absolute insane idiocy of these people you’d have to know- Maybe the movement, so-called, is run by the enemy. I don’t know.But they have fantasies- You ever heard of a guy named Jim Wickstrom? He made up fantasies about how 200 million Mongolian horsemen were riding their steeds across the Alaskan tundra to attack America.
Another one, a retired Colonel, had a fantasy about millions of Mexican Communists hiding in tunnels waiting to attack us. It’s a kind of insane asylum (laughs).
Don’t accuse me of having anything to do with the right-wing or even White- it’s time for something new now.
Meredith: But then that would suggest that the movement is pretty powerless.
David Lane: Boy, you said it for me. There is no movement.
Now that’s David Lane speaking. Please start to get a clue, any White advocate, that maybe its not necessary to identify as right wing. And I hope that you will please take further clues that our enemies want us to identify as ring, moreover, for us to Not identify as a White Left.
The reason there is no movement is because White activism has been confused, its agency paralyzed not only by perfidy in identity with the right, with its destabilizing and unaccountable, reactionary rigidity, its speculative perfidy; but also by aversion, riddled by paradoxical injunctions fostered by our enemies, obfuscating the benign and helpful organizing concepts deeper beneath the ordinary language of the left – associating it superficially, paradoxically and repugnantly, with liberalization of racial and national borders.
There is No White movement, David Lane said. And the reason there is no movement is because it organizing principle is paralyzed beneath this semantic paradox which directs contradictory performance requirements, attributing to union activism a liberal motive to open bounds and borders, whereas the left, more fundamentally is about exclusionary unionization – yes, applied to a racial and ethnonational level it would liberalize antagonistic lines between classes and bounds within the ethnonation, including hard pressed workers and those marginalized, but most fundamentally, and importantly, on the racial and national level it would shore up bounds and borders.
Benign and helpful social organizing concepts and ideas of human nature deeper beneath the ordinary language of the left have been covered up with repugnant and paradoxic association.
Buried and confused, social and agentive conceptions of the left are made repugnant to Whites by the distortions, downright misrepresentation and weaponization of agentive and social unionization in Marxist internationalism and its later day YKW permutation of ant-White PC; with its assault on White bounds and borders – most essentially weaponinizing a contradiction in the fusing of left and liberalism, which are really opposites in essence and identification.
By otherwise fusing the contradiction of liberalism and left organization, and aligning the reaction with the social group destabilizing, unaccountable, disorganizing identity as right, we are prevented as a social system from sufficient advocacy and homeostasis.
Though Lane was correct to be critical of the right, he was not going in a sufficiently radical direction as a third postionist, as that ultimately obstructs social correctability by including objectivist elements in disingenuousness or blind naivete, making way for entryism of enemies by means of objectivism’s rational blindness and in the quest for moral purity of the “traditions” by which they’ve deceived us, – our tradition of pure scientistic objectivity which blinded us to our relative and group interests; or forced the toleration of our so called tradtion of Christianity, already having provided a means to infiltrate and direct our narrative structure in the past. That is to say, third positionism, for its inclusion of right wing elements introduces the inherent instability that ultimately directs it back into right wing reaction.
Our enemies know that we shall remain weak or headlong and easily misdirected as right wingers or quote, neither right nor left, and potentially very stable and unbeatable as organized in a leftist conceptualization conceived in our interests, and that understanding of theirs is pivotal in their management of discourse against us.
Even so, we’re beginning to stave off the charge and even the fact of getting sucked in by the monocauslity that STEM types are so disposed to … and let me clarify first that in this case, I don’t mean the monocausality of the J.Q. – I mean the monocausality of a supposedly singular inspiration and influence for the idea of White Left Ethnonationalism, since it is not at all the case that there is a singular inspiration, reason or cause. Clearly, I was not “advised” by somebody in academia to take this position.
The concept of White Left Ethnonationalism doesn’t come as advised from Jewish academia – it doesn’t come as advised from any academia that I’ve known of. It comes as inference from various influences and sources both positive and negative.
Let’s look at some negative sources that should commend reverse inference to the position of White Left Ethnonationalism.
There are reasons why identification as right, far-right, alternative right, neither left nor right, third position, even Alt Left and Alt Center, anything but White left Ethnonationalism has been encouraged and even imposed on our identity and would-be advocacy; and why “THE LEFT” is portrayed as the grand enemy.
Look at how much effort the kosher friendly tent of the Regnery circus (until recently generally known as The Alt Right), Keith Preston, Robert Stark, Andy Nowicky, and others have gone through in order to subvert and divert from this White Left Nationalist position. That should tell you something.
There is a reason why Colin Liddell editor of the former Alternative Right, now called Affirmative Right, is encouraged to feature bracket (((John K. Press)))‘s Judeo-Christian”, quote, “culturalism” to promote a kosher version of Western civilization against The Left.
Looking critically at how the brackets themselves, such as The Rubin Report, define the left now as enemy, that should call particular critical attention to the stereotypes attributed to characterize this so called enemy position to all of us good, realistic people, who see things aright, the way the good YKW and right wingers do.
The Savage Hippie podcast with Edwin Oslan and David Cole Stein – why do you think these people are trying to rally people against the left?
Look at who the kosher Lauren Southern and others coming by way of Ezra Levant’s Rebel Media target – they see The left and these moniker that I never even heard of ten years ago, this kosher, madison avenue marketing term called Social Justice Warriors as the enemy.
Frame Games has been keen to assert his right wing arrival in so called red pilling (the supposedly cool term for supposedly awakening) against “the Left” and its so called “social justice warriors” because of their oppression of his purported love for the pure objective science and truth .. a concern for which would, ehem, Cohencidentally, conveniently, ostensibly, justify his people’s hegemony, awareness and resentment of which is to be buffered in his so called “heart right.”
Luke Ford, a Jewish convert and advocate of YKW , is another one who is highly active in promoting anti-leftism and anti-left Jewry as allies on the right with White nationalism.
Faithful tracing and attendance to this perspective will point to the elitist culpabilty of YKW and complicit right wing sell outs.
What do we do to close off the Kosher, internationalist definition and altercast of THE Left? With it, the liberal extrapolated contradiction that prohibits full White social classification as quote, “racist”? Well, we put White in front of it for one thing, availing ourselves of the deeper part of ordinary language that combines unionized delimitation as stipulated for Whites proper – as opposed to “international workers” or hard workers of just any color.
Unionization of Whites, their bounds, and White nations, their borders, closes-off liberalization as it should be
It undoes the absurd idea that “the left” necessarily advocates imposition of immigrants – only an internationalist, Marxist left would do that, all others would see it as scabbing.
Teasing apart liberalism and Left unionization applies to racial speciation as well – it would be seen as analogous to imperialist, feudalistic servant mastering exploitation and usurpation to liberalize the bounds of species on a biological level, imposition of invasive and predatory species, taking away natural exclusionary self defense. These things would not serving the “Leftist” good of rank and file, marginal or even elite Whites
And it should provide a clue of negative inference that our enemies have already joined Frame Games in a lame effort to head off that proposition – the stipulation of White unionzation by placing White before the term, White Left ethnonationalism, and that’s why it is extra important that we maintain this distinction between White and YKW – to see them as an outroup, not as friends and allies and to not allow them entryism or to define who our friends and enemies are or our terms.
Cohencidentally, they have already enlisted help, or rather a kid calling himself Alt-hype has taken it upon himself to discuss with Frame Games the means to try head off and subvert the White ethnonationalist Left https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DcajhGJa5-4 – telling Frame Games that he is going to advocate a “neither let nor right angle in days to come”, observing what I say that identifying as right puts us behind the 8-ball, and suggesting that some people are to paraphrase him, superficial enough to think that by adding the prefix White before a term that it does something. Well it does do something, it adds racial specification to the kind of Left unionization/classification and Nationalism as the group unit of left unionization as White – meaning of European extraction and if we are serous, honest and at all safe, non-Jewish.
So, how do we sort the term Left from liberalism, teasing apart the terms to stop their fusing in a contradiction that our enemies have weaponized against us (extending it beyond a classic liberal expectation of upper national classes being accountable to lower nationalist classes, which has been extrapolated by Marxists, other YKW and right wing sell outs who then disingenuously distort he notion of class bounds to blur the bounds of nation such that the whole nation is supposed to be accountable beyond the classificatory bounds of its nation, liberalizing its borders to open them to those of other nations formerly excluded) thereby confounding rupturing our organizational power?
We place the term White before the term Left and Ethnonationalism to definitively close off racial group bounds and internationalist borders; that ends the liberalist fusion; overcoming the inspired phobia of the term that the YKW have instilled with academic abuse, gross distortion, promulgated by their media – a fabrication of social conceptualizations as it has been weaponized against Whites.
We then avail ourselves to a sober, accurate and deeper ordinary language of the left, of White Left EthnoNationalist unionizing and coalition building, the type of organizational powers of left activism which provides for an ongoing accountability and attendance to bounds and borders, as opposed to our maintenance being stigmatized as our so called oppression of those supposedly marginalized by us, i.e., those who are not our marginals at all, but imposed as a matter of might makes right liberal bullying, members of other nations come to scab and take our social capital, to rupture our rank and file and worker’s unionization in defense; even to usurp our finest endowed, but with that unionized perspective we not only preclude scabbing of foreign nationals, we are also provided with a perspective of ongoing accountability and attendance to bounds and borders so that elite betrayal is headed off, as we disallow any unaccountable reasoning of their supposed objective merit to betray us by opening our bounds, that as right wing sell outs they are justified in aiding and abetting the YKW in Cohencidentally espousing their new position against left organization and vigilance against their elite exploitation, with the disingenuous right wing position that they have achieved on objective merit, hegemony in th 7 to 9 power niches, reaching particular hegemony after the 2008 financial melt down.
Objectivism, the objectivism of the right, which it loves to purport, is not only scary in its pretense of pure motive and lack of accountability, but like Christianity, a way in, a means of entryism for the YKW.
There is a reason why a Jared Taylor, so famously YKW amiable, who sees them as looking HuWhite to him, there is a reason why exponents like this want to maintain the enemy as the left, to maintain stereotypes of what this left is doing – “social constructionism says that race is just this optical illusion” – rather than allow us to distinguish a White, from a Jewish, internationalist left …there are obvious reasons why they want White people to be HuWhite people, to include YKW and to identify with the Right, as purveyors of quote, objective truth.
WN who consider themselves JQ vigilant observe that Jared Taylor Jared Taylor exposed https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oO30y3Vmqx8 and Paul Kersey espouse a platform to unite White and YKW/Zionist interests https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mirL15zZYNc , adopting the alt-right moniker at least so far as it served its purposes of putting the Zionist Trump into office, but as the Alt-Right term falls into disfavor, they’ll shift to some sort of neither left nor right thing that allows for YKW entryism nevertheless. At Majorityrights we’ve recognized that as an advanced stage of parasitism, with a disingenuous quid pro-quo to quasi White interests that has facilitated Donald Trump to do Zionist bidding; they will oppose a White Left ethnonationalism that opposes YKW inclusion or alliance.
I want you to think again and begin to re-consider the deep resource that the masters of discourse avail themselves of, which right wingers do not, as they take away our unionizing initialization.
So lets go a little deeper historically to dredge up how the broad public reacts to what is happening through the depths of ordinary language, the deep, shared resource that they have to interpret and respond to political discourse.
There are a few currents beneath ordinary language of The Left.
One current is confused due primarily to how the YKW and those finding right wing positions convenient have allowed the classical liberal position to be over extended and hyper-extended with Alinskyesque weaponization, “making them live up to their own rules” – i.e., making not only the White upper classes reach a hand beyond their class into the working classes, but having the White lower classes to live up to their own rules to share resources, by reaching a hand to those outside their class bounds, that is to say out side the national bounds – the notion of classical liberalism was taken by the Marxist international and other YKW, such as the PC of the Frankfurt school to extend the matter of liberalization of White upper class bounds as not only a matter of responsibility to lower class fellow White nationalists, but to liberalize even the bounds of working class and marginal Whites, to extend resources and liberalization even over the national classificatory bounds and borders.
This is where the YKW international Left, what I call the red left, has disingenuously fused liberalism and “the left” for their own anti-White, YKW and greater Zionist interests to diffuse their adversaries; but also convenient it’s been for Right wing sell outs to undermine and scab working class and marginal organization and resistance to their treachery.
Thus, liberal responsibility of the English upper classes to the lower classes, has been twisted by the YKW and handed to right wing sell outs to extend the notion of reaching across class lines to lord internationalism and anti-racism, another form of reaching across social classificaition, over the head of working class ethnonationals and marginals among an ethnonation, who would otherwise be able to organize and resist elite abuse and rank and file liberalism, resist scabbery as Left Ethnonationalists, as White Left Ethnonationalists.
Thus, when shabbos goy Andy Nowicky says “in America the left and liberalism are synonymous” it is true, these have been synonymous as disingenuously twisted by the aims of the YKW Left, but what he is conveniently (for the payoff, or out of cowardice) ignoring is the disingenuousness of this contradiction while he is also ignoring the fact that “the left” as enemy has only been the rage as a term of derision only since about 2008.
Again, ordinary language is a key resource among group understanding and they YKW have been playing this, what is a contradiction, against White interests for years, but its gone into overdrive since 2008, as they’ve come to predominate in all key power niches – thus, Left organization against them is their greatest concern, as it would turn attention to the injustice, their position and their large part in the destruction of systemic EGI and human ecology.
That’s why they’ve promulgated this anti-left campaign, wanting to maintain the confused association of left and liberalism, adding new campaigns, against “social justice warriors” – as opposed to our battle cry, the 14 words – after all, who wants social justice now that the YKW are so unjustly on top, imperiling where not already having destroyed the future of White children? Who opposes leftist unionization and accountability arrayed against them? They marshaled this phony movement called the Alt-Right to put their Zionist boy Trump into office, adding to the coup de gras for ZOG, while in America and Europe pitting Whites against their other enemies, Hispanics, Muslims and Asians who don’t give a fig about their historical sob stories.
Coming back to the wisdom of the language, as Heidegger calls it, and to the wisdom of ordinary language, as ordinary language philosophers call it.
We can resolve the YKW exploited contradiction of treating the Left and liberalism as synonymous.
The Internationalist left and its liberalism arrayed against our White bounds and borders as opposed to the White Ethnonationalist Left, with our nations conceptualized as unions – members and non members, bounds and borders.
The Marxist international left, is of course a Jewish left, which has found its way ultimately to organize facile unions and coalitions against White Nationalism. That means, in regard to the White classifications and national bounds, it prescribes liberalism of those bounds, not Leftism for us or our nations.
Because they have controlled the discourse and they are trying to destroy us, they are intent to maintain that contradictory, disorganizing definition, a double speak, left is liberal, liberal is left. ..and the right? They don’t organize in social classification, they adhere to facts and principles, social organization, that’s for supposedly dehumanizing, de-personalizing collectivists, that’s for leftist communists, you have your identity by your pure factual merit alone, without any of those lefty-social props.
So we return ordinary language once again for the most radical underpinning of the left – it is full group unionization – to maintain vigilance against elite betrayal also rank and file defection and scabbery – closing off liberalism in a word by accountability to union bounds.
A social group and a union is not the whole world.
Workers of the world unite, you say? – that’s still liberal with regard to White group and national bounds. Indeed it is and that’s why we add White and Ethnonational in front of Left, to make sure that we are talking about a White Left Ethnonationalism – it is not liberal, just the opposite, you are in the union or you are not – you are in favor for the union’s homeostasis, or you maintain the union, or you are liberal – these are opposites.
Left and liberal are no longer confused as they have been by the YKW and right wing sell outs.
We go further to exploit the ill defined position for its unpopularity, to take the moribund definition and breath life to define the White ethnonational left as we see fit:
While it recognizes that some assets are better state controlled and others not; It does not mean that there cannot be private property.
While it provides for the leverage of a social bottom line and safety net, it does not begrudge wealth and a great deal of free enterprise and individual liberty – in fact, recognizing an option for sex as monogamous sacrament as an important option, in that liberty. Just the option being there, even if absolutely practiced by a minority, its being there as an option adds reason to maintain loyalty to the group, to overcome cynicism …. it is almost better in its abstract form that it not be flouted in the name of empiricism, is important as a psychological resting place.
It is only most conservative of the national bounds – you may leave, but the nation might not take you back; or your children of another people.
It does not create conflict between so called working and upper classes, but rather integrates them in a common nationalist union.
It does not wall paper over the differences between different niche abilities and requirements, nor seek to view them through the quantifying false comparison of equality, but rather views niche roles as largely incommensurate, qualitatively complementary and respectfully symbiotic – it takes the same complementary, non supremacist disposition to other nations.
And here we come to some of the positives of White Left Ethnonationalism:
It provides a permanently stabilizing position to facilitate homeostasis of the group ecology, as it maintains accountability and vigilance on elite positions and potential betrayal and also accountability to and of rank and file for loyalty.
And it does this without rigidity as our people are recognized as having some freedom and agency in their maturity, for maintained as Aristotle’s praxis, in a corrective process of our ethne there, through the agency of social construction, social group classification and our place is maintained, and the ongoing relative gauge of group interests manage by hermeneutic circle, correcting between the rigor of empirical testing, and the perspective of imagination, the breadth and scope of the hypothesis, of the ideal and the vision that allows us to see our personal, relational social and bio-systemic, historical breadth and beyond, to realize our potential and beyond what we thought we could, yet remaining ensconced, appreciated and replenished in the restorative balance and correction of our social praxis, being there and sustained by time in memorial patterns both routine and and those that bear the reverence of sacrament.
White Left EthnoNationalism manages social construction and a hermeneutic circle, engaging the science of objective facts as need be, and maintaining its relevance among the broader hypothesis and relative interest of our group, taking broader systemic and historical perspective as well, as need be, on orientation and imaginative possibilities, or even the relief of impossibilities, as it were.
As such, it is not anti- nature or anti science, seeking to artificially apply concepts, the great stereotypes that would mischaracterize the working hypotheses of the White ethnonationalist left.
In this relative position, it provides for a freedom from the arbitrariness of Cartesian objectivism, providing individual and group accountability, coherence, agency, warrant and pervasive ecology by contrast.
And so we come full circle, where we can see why we are being told in all disingenuousness, all naivete, why there is this character perfectly consistent in its personalty and motives called the left and its doing this that and the other thing to us which is no good for us…
While the refer to gross distortions and abuses of social concepts, unionization, responsibility to workers and inclusion of marginals, social constructionism, hermenteutics, even liberalism we see…
They don’t want you to have a proper understanding, but rather the abused and misrepresented misunderstanding post modernity, as a proper understanding is a crucial idea to save our people, facilitating the negotiation of modernizing and inherited requirements,
There are many stereotypes that our enemies are propping up to provide a consistent, antagonistic and perfidious characterized opposition to our positive definition of the left, so that our people are turned off by such identification.
They tell us that the left is anti science, that hermeneutics is anti-science, when that is absolutely not true of the White Ethnonationalist Left.
They tell us that social constructionism and its correctable, participatory means of knowledge generation and agreement as to how it courts is nonsensical, that hermeneutics and its intent on verifiability is a means to evasion.
Then adherents to the right suppose that some magic hand somewhere above or buried deep within subhuman nature will provide guidance.
We supply verifiable hypotheses, maintaining that social groups, that our race and other races real, supplying the hypotheses for verifcation, and they say we are anti science; and trying not to test hypotheses, but to apply coercive, artificial concepts to nature.
As proponent of the current Jewish position attributing negative stereotypes to “The” Left defines the left right distinction, he says
Luke Ford: to be on the left is to take the perspective that human nature is almost perfectable and that people are basically good; and to be on the right is to take the perspective that human nature is deeply flawed and the natural tendency of human beings is to take the easy way out.
They want you to say that the left invariably hell bent on equality while they are soberly against it, dealing with truth, nature and reality.
That this is the essence of the distinction, that a White Left, its praxis, does not deal with reality, is not correctable, nothing could be further from the truth.
They want you to say that you are against equality, irrespective of incommensurable symbiotic qualities. they want you to say you are against equality, that looks odd.
They want you to say that you are against the diversity industry, and that you are for Abrahamic integration.
That you are a paleocon, like pat Buchanan, they want you to say that you are against multicultural sewer and for English speaking and Judeo Christian values for all.
That you are fore integration, multiculturalism isn’t working.
They want you to say that you are against social justice, in fact, you are against any social concern – that you are against sociology, the group unit of analysis, associating social concern with one thing, resources going to non-Whites.
Because you are not supposed to be left, the left is this stereotype of a bunch of anti natural anti factual things, propositions ….. they want you to say that the left is artificial and malevolent, social concerns are nonsense now that it serves the YKW interest to say so.
There’s another one, “the left” can’t meme, it’s not like we should have to tell people like Andy Nowicky that the YKW of Madison Ave have been cranking such supposedly funny memes for the right, outfits such as TRS…
They want their useful idiots, an Andy Nowicki to follow the paleocon line, diverting with ridiculous conspiracy theories – “pizzagate” – and their Madison Ave. marketed memes – such as, “the left can’t meme”, where as the Alt-Right can, and supposedly “dissident right” can. ..with Madison Ave. marketing firms cranking-out supposedly funny memes to the right, such as TRS.
By contrast to this nonsense, the antidote:
It has to be a White Left Ethnonational Position and not a third position, a centrist position. let alone some jewish promoted Alt left or center position, because those positions always allow entryism of destabilizing, arbitrarily leading objectivism, liberal ideology such as Christianity and the relatively good outliers of outroups such as YKW et al.
As opposed to this arbitrary foolishness, hermeneutics and social constructionism proper, White Post Modernity proper, allows for the ongoing homeostasis of White group systemics through White Left ethnoantionalism in coherence, accountability agency and warrant.
Whereas right wing objectivism or third positionism are Cartesian and naive, inherently unstable and susceptible to entryism and subversion.
Misdirection into minor and greater disasters is always a susceptibility of the right and alt right as they commit their epistemological blunder and to try to be purer and more natural than the social bracing of praxis and come off the hinges into disaster – come off the correctability into disaster.
Where as the praxis of the White ethnonational left provides for the circuit breakers and correction of social group systemic homeostasis in praxis.
The White ethnonational left also incentivizes participation – we’ll help you if you help us and are accountable – as opposed to taking the right wing disposition of hey, tough luck, might makes right, pick yourself up by your bootstraps – that’s life, that’s nature, just the way it is, “tough nuggets.”
By contrast in the White, EthnoNational left:
Unionized boundaries are provided for accountability in praxis and thereby for management of compassion for a moral order, human and pervasive ecology – it’s homeostasis.
They want you to make false comparisons, generating conflict with the disrespect of pseudo objectivity, to display it both in and out group, that stupid lack of compassion and accountability, the “just the way-it-isnness”, of right wing objectivism, that correctly turns people off and keeps a White movement from being popular and viable. ..and why on top of everything they want you to believe its a matter of sheer, right wing objective facticity that is the reason that they’re on top …. natural merit, no cooperation in relative social interests about it.
Those concerned for White interests might observe by negative inference from Taylor how right wing objectivism is encouraged to frighten and turn-off popular support – how right wing positions are encouraged as such with David Duke as well – Duke is an interesting case in how he operates – not selling out to the YKW directly but selling out to White right wingers who do sell out to YKW (he takes the pay off by means of corrupt elite support and popular support from audiences forever curbed in right-wingism, in their popular backing though seriously conflicted (in its sundry anti-social platforms) – encouraged to coddle the dead end stigma of Nazi apologetics and exoneration, the self sacrificing Abrahamic foolery of Christianity, the forever limited in popularity platform of objectivist leit brutality, its lack of accountability and lack of compassion granted support nevertheless exactly for giving Whites that bum steer AND for taking the quid pro quo to YKW interests of late by endorsing the Zionist Donald Trump – Prof Kevin MacDonald (except for not going so far in Nazi apologetics and exoneration) follows a near identical angle, among almost all White advocates these past few years who have adopted this altercast position as White advocates, right wing positioned against “THE Left.”
They provide just a few among a deluge of glaring examples that should not only send up red flags, but set sirens off – that there is something to look at here, not only in taking David Lane’s license to criticize and reject the Right label, not just by negative inference with Jared Taylor, Paul Kersey, or all the people who have flowed through Paul Gottfried’s Alt-Right school of anti-leftism, The TRS marketing scheme, the narratives provided by boomer sellouts like David Duke to feed generation internet bubble, that there might be something to look into there with a Left perspective, but not just the left perspective as they portray it and characterize it, as internationalist, but one that serves White interests, as White ethnonationalist, and defined by ourselves, availing ourselves of self definition as opposed to the stereotypes and misdirection that they attribute.
I could go on almost indefinitely with what are more like blatant signs than clues provided by key exponents of the Anti-Left, to those who would depict a characterized left as the enemy, in their dubious motives or misunderstanding (in the case of McDonald, the misunderstanding is a bit more naivete), I could go on indefinitely with examples of this promulgated anti-left platform for the sheer volume and dubious popularity of the “anti-left” play – an angle which, before 2008, had limited venues and a small stage, there was dubious popularity for the anti-left play, an angle which, before 2008, had a small stage with limited runs, greatly outbooked and overshadowed by shows about the enemy put on the PC and Liberal stage.
But again, negative inference is not the only source for inspiration and inference for the viability of a White Left Ethnonationalist position.
To cure this contradictory, oxymoronic definition of left as being synonymous with liberalism, we need to look at the history and go into the depth grammar, deeper still than the Alynsky-like extension of liberalism that Marxism and the cultural Marxism of the Frankfurt School has promoted, and go to an even deeper meaning of the left in ordinary language – which is unionization, thus delimitation and conserving of bounds and borders (the opposite of liberalization) to include a full group, such that accountability, fair sharing of resource and compassion is extended to all within the union; exploitation from liberalization of the bounds and borders, by rank and file and marginal scabbery so to speak, and betrayal by the elites is blocked – that is to say, as applied to the national level, the ethno-nation becomes one class, not a classes divided against each other, one arguing for “equality” the other on “objective merit” but rather, including all within the nation as being within the union, and all left nationalism’s within the coalition as participating in incommensurable niches, not to be falsely compared and competing, but respected as necessary for the complementary, symbiotic functioning of the whole group system and homeostasis in pervasive ecology.
How do we sort out the term Left from liberalism as our enemies have that contradiction weaponized (to over extend classic liberalism beyond upper national classes being accountable to lower nationalist classes) against our overall organizational power as a group, a coherent group? We place the term White Ethnonational before Left, so that becomes the ordinary language taken for granted – you have a White Ethnonational left which closes off the racial and internationalist liberalism and provides for the organizational powers of left activism, it also allows us the agency not only broadly, but allows us the agency to define what we mean by a White Leftism.
With that closing off, that unionization as it were, borders are secured, unwanted immigration is seen as a form of scabbing as it were, while racial imposition is seen for what it is: supremacism and exploitation headed-toward slavery.
But with that agency, social construction, hermeneutics and movement social unionization we begin to take away the stereotypes of this anthropomorphized character, this characterization that our enemies find most useful now, this mischarachtarization of the so called left and the things that IT is supposed to us, not our enemies, not our naive, not our traitors.
They apply a stereotype of left conceptualization to us: Attributing a stereotype misrepresentation of our agency in social construction, the gross perversions of said theory in YKW academia, alleging that we claim that we can make just anything of our emergent qualities… ignoring that we say that race is real; that differences between people are real and important, they claim that we say that race is just some sort of optical illusion.
They apply a stereotype of left conceptualization to us: Taking our verifiable and correctable hypotheses that our nation and race are real and attribute instead a false stereotype, giving us an altercast into right wing irresponsibility and saying that we are trying to impose artificial concepts upon nature and upon people, trying to coerce them.
The truth is anti racism is just this anti classification, just this anti social classification and discrimination on the basis of those classifications – denying us our working hypotheses: it is Cartesian, it is clearly not innocent, it is prejudice, it is hurting and it is killing people.
They apply a stereotype of left conceptualization to us: That the heremeneutic circle that we use to negotiate that Cartesian divide between the empirical, and principle and concept, managing the empirical emergent factual world with broader systemic, historical hypothesis conceptualization and account is the means to deny science and reality when it is just the opposite, it is a means to manage our inherited forms and and ways and possibilities for improvement competently, as White Post Modernity provides for, against arbitrary input and in recognition of engagement of relative, group interests – social classifications which are not a fiction of the mind, as the empiricist Locke, had conceived.
They apply a stereotype of left conceptualization to us: But we don’t allow them to put us in a position of being “against equality” and “social justice”, as objectivist, no account, “might makes right supremacists” when in fact we recognize incommensurate qualities and abilities in and between groups that are not to suffer quantifying false comparison and the reciprocal hostility it generates, but rather are to be appreciated and respected for their complementary symbiotic function of in-group homeostasis and inter-group coordination.
We are anti-supremacist and exploitation.
They apply a stereotype of left conceptualization to us: But we don’t allow them to characterize us as being against diversity and multiculturalism and therefore, in ordinary language, for integration in their Mulatto Abrahamic following.
They apply a stereotype of left conceptualization to us: That we supposedly deny individualism when we in fact provide for its authentic means.
They apply a stereotype of left conceptualization to us: That we are supposedly against private property and wealth, we are supposedly jealous, when in fact we provide for its means and the justice that would maintain it proper, and great reward in life.
They apply a stereotype of left conceptualization to us: That we are supposedly in favor of immigration, when that is directly opposed to our unionized interests, scabbing our labor, usurping our social capital and resource; destroying the carrying capacity and pervasive ecology, rather we favor social accountability starting from our particular White unionized interests and coalitions, population and land resource carrying capacity management.
They apply the stereotype that we want the state to do everything: no, we most fundamentally want to control the borders, after that there is significant of flexibility as to what is best handled by the state or privately.
And they apply a stereotype of left conceptualization to us: A negative stereotype, that we are supposedly anti-nature, applying artificial constructs with absurd levels of individual agency, but they don’t know us, our fantastic properties of collective negotiation are just beginning:
We Are The White Class.
And wouldn’t you think it would occur to people that this thing called “the left”, this anthropomorphized character who is perfectly consistent in these things it does and wants, these artificial constructs that it wants to impose on us in perfect villainy emerged coincidentally, raising its ugly head to be beaten like a bobo doll by right wing reaction around 2008 and more and more ever since… they don’t want us to talk about I.Q. because we all know that’s why the YKW are on top, these jealous lefties can’t handle the race reality that the YKW have the highest group I.Q.
Now, there’s this anthropomorphized thing called THE LEFT and coincidentally since about 2008, more and more defenders of huWhite people have diagnosed this as the problem and coincidentally, so too have more and more YKW and well, just about anyone else who wanted to be promoted, to be popular….. where as in the days before 2008 and before the Internet, this was not so much recognized, there wasn’t so much recognition of the left as the problem, once in a blue moon there was someone who’d accuse an opponent of being far to the left, but communist, of course not, that was long ago laughably defeated, maybe a socialist, but then, to become popular that way was only to the status signalers and as a dog-whistle-legitimate-cause for Whites who didn’t want to be called racist for not voting democrat…of course you could risk coming out as just preferring the Republicans.. people would be bold enough to admit that they didn’t like the Democrats because they were the black people’s party but to admit that you voted Republican even though they only dog whistled to Whites and didn’t act in your interests was to admit that you were still a fool and that took even more guts.
Then it became PC that was the enemy, and indeed Marxist Left roots were recognized but the general moniker for the enemy remained, PC, but with increasing disclosure of Cultural Marxism and the Frankfurt school in its Jewishness, it was incumbent upon the Horowitzes to call those Jewish leftists to begin to help the paleocons to develop a new angle – against the Left entirely since PC was cutting too close to the bone.
There were some people who were more bold still, more honest, who would cite liberals as the problem – though it was a more accurate a designation of the enemy behavior and program as it applied to White group interests, it made you look funny, putting you and all your cool tastes aside and placing you in a pew along side people who wore bow ties and went to some weird denomination Christian church, or people who had these convoluted arguments to conserve liberalism – because the constitution was liberal – at least in its amended form, ad or its anti social classification Lockeatine civil rights, it certainly is, and certainly by way of civil rights – at that point it was all about liberal prerogative and nothing about conserving your group interest’s borders and boundaries, not for White people anyway; there are famous provisos for blacks and other minorities.
So, as an implicit White advocate, you might cite liberals as the enemy’s behavior most accurately proscribed and described, but you were advocating a position that conserved and objectivist constitution whereupon you could only hope, whistling in the dark right back at the fainter and fainter dog whistles amidst howling torrents of anti-White audacity that kept increasing despite the fact that you always thought it couldn’t get worse.
You just had to hope that you and the rest of the White guys were objectively better on all metrics, in all episodes despite the (increasing non-White competition that was illegal to discriminate against, depute the fact that they were going to be better and rewarded lavishly on some popular metrics that did not measure your best attributes as a White man… attributes for which you might even be punished) competition for the Constitution’s individual rights taken hyperbolic by anti-racism’s prohibition of group classification and discrimination, hush hush about dependence upon Unions that’s a concern for the black people’s party.
So, you could rail against these liberals and be a “conservative,” conserving the very liberal notion of rights which translated into making it virtually illegal to do anything about this, to discriminate on the basis of classification, especially with added hyperbolic YKW measures.
America, the land of liberal opportunity, self maximization for all – a competition of all individuals against all, isn’t that great? Its natural, like the right says, competition is natural and what makes us great and generates all accomplishments….. isn’t it?
How could you be such a communist, a collectivist, against the capitalist opportunity given you to free individual enterprise, that so many brave men have fought and died for?
What is your ethnic genetic interests, aren’t you an American?
How dare you not love America, as a man, not take advantage of its wonderful opportunities to achieve according to your objective merit as measured against everyone’s objective merit? How dare you not love the Constitution and its Amendments? Individual rights, Civil rights?
It’s impossible, Marxism is dead. Your position as a White American man is the envy of the world…. meanwhile your noticing something that you never used to see back in the seventies and mid 80s …
And you had to whistle in the dark, and hope that White girls would do the right thing, and date and marry White guys as they always had, despite the howling din of feminism and its increasing correspondence with anti-White man criticism throughout the seventies and 80’s, its implications finally bursting through the damn of popular acceptance/enforcement with Madonna’s Like a Prayer Video and the race-mixing propaganda, a nightmare of ever increasing White woman/black pairings modeled more and more through media, from porno, to movies and TV and even commercials.
Now by the 90s there were some people on our side… people who’d figured it out real good, like Pat Buchanan – we just needed to be done with this multicultural sewer, all speak English and adhere to our Judeo-Christian faith – be a paleocon!
Ok, Ok, so you couldn’t identify with Pat Buchanan any more than you could identify with any of the right wing groups that you were supposed to identify with if you didn’t want blacks imposed on you – KKK, regular Christians, weirder Christians still, Nazis, some sort of crazy militia men… hell, some of these people were calling women you could dream about not White because they had brown hair, a vowel on the end of their name and didn’t speak English….
Nevermind that a confederation of left ethnonationals preserves our differences, including among Whites.
When paleocon integration needs redressing and augmentation against the “left, its mulitculturaliams and diversity industry” call in bracket Frank Meyer’s paleocon heir, Paul Gottried to give it augmentation and a new look, Anything, Anything but the Left – lets call it that Alt Right and include anyone who has anti-social ideas – that will make sure White organization never goes anywhere…so when that fails as it inevitably would for the inherent instability of the right, its proneness to infiltration, anti-social reaction, etc, hail gait, unite the right, we’ll look for a real right then a real, real right .. allow for a bit of tears for Uncle Adolph, call in Frame games and his, quote heart right, Anything….
To maintain the crazy and stupid epistemological blunder lacking the social accountability and correctability of praxis, of
The White Class.
The issue with this generational feedback loop from boomers to the millennial generation and beyond is that the right wingers and liberals among these demographics are being played by Jewish interests to keep White identity and motions to systemic self correction, homeostasis and sovereignty, ineffective if not down right destructive.
And some Xer’s, particularly STEM types who have been encouraged in their personal lives by relative success through the tech field, are going to be susceptible to look upon would-be post modern corrective as so much nonsense, particularly as it is red caped, of course. And instead of being part of the corrective to the Boomer cancer, they use their nerd-tech skills to patch up the right wing conduit of modernity from Boomers to the subsequent generations.
By golly, that’s where we want wrong; the boomer right wingers are right, we didn’t do it hard enough! And they patch up (or try to patch) the glaring epistemic contradiction between “left and liberal.” As noted, the first casualties of didactic incitement will be on the the tautological level.
The YKW have been experts in in playing White people, not only ascribing White identity and nationalism as right wing (or far right, alt-right, dissident right, or letting in right wing destabilization by claiming “neither left nor right, “national socialist” or third position – anything but white left ethnonationalist, but in getting them to confuse what really are opposite terms, left and liberal.
They have done this by co-opting the basis of the left, unionization and coalition building, and red caping it as a Marxist internationalist union, workers of the world uniting against nationalism, the nation state which is supposed to wither away on behalf of communist utopia; and where that was slow going, co-opting the left as Cultural Marxist, Politically Correct unions of blacks, women, gays and whomever they might gather in coalition against Whites, with absurd red capes of post modern concepts to wield against “White privilege.”
But the point is, their red caping, whether of the Marxist international unionization of “international proletariat” or the unionization of Cultural Marxist anti-White, supposed victim groups, us founded upon the concept of unionization: which is conservative of that which is within the union. While liberalism opens boundaries and borders. Hence, in attacking White borders and bounds, they are effecting liberalization of White boundaries. That is, it is NOT Leftism for Whites. It is imposed liberalism (though Whites continue to confuse the terms left and liberal, using the terms interchangeably).
In depth grammar, the left unionizes people, facilitates accountability, systemic correctability, thus homeostasis, autonomy and sovereignty, while liberalism opens borders and boundaries.
This holds true cross contextually.
Liberalism opens boundaries and maintains its warrant to license and licentiousness on the claim of objective basis. The internationalist left would be trying encourage this liberalization of our borders and bounds until we are dead, in effect, and it can impose its union rule with finality.
Right wingism is also based on objectivism, a confirmation bias to justify the merit of its position while minimizing indebtedness to its social group; but is a bit more disingenuously calculating or naively unknowing in how it leaves borders susceptible for the rational blindness to social accountability in its purity spirals. And with that, lacking the structure of social accountability and anchoring in social correctivity thereof, it is inherently unstable
With their marketing campaign against “the left” (on the market since 2008), Jewry is doing its usual thing, only hyperbolically so, of trying to disrupt European/White systemic homeostasis.
They are doing this by preventing us from taking on left organizational concepts in White interests (i.e., White Left Ethnonationalism), notably, unionizing against the power of Jewry, their right wing cohorts (who take the pay offs to be freed from group accountability through the proposed “objectivity” of their individual merit) and liberal cohorts (who take the license and licentiousness to be freed from group accountability through the proposed “objectivity” of their individual merit).
And with that marketing campaign bought into by Whites, White identity is not known as, and functioning with that “fictional” structuring of unionization, with its facilitation of social accountability, correctivity and systemic homeostasis; it is not known as being stable and sane, within the bounds of human reason, nor compassionate, recognizing and empathizing with OUR marginalized in fellowship, so as to gain popular adherence; nor gaining thus, the ability to coordinate coalitions as we are not increased in our anthropecentric empathy; our own resource not secured, we are not in better position to coordinate with others.
Xer Semiogogue, having a taste of e-celeb, right wing Xer dummy chasing the red cape of post modernity that he is, doesn’t want any of that recentralization of Praxis, na ah.
Thus when the Xer philosophical mediocrity, Greg Johnson (PhD Philosophy, editor Counter-Currents), says in conversation with Millennial Woes (I don’t suppose that they suck each other off – yet) that when the internationalist left is imposing draconian measures against White free speech that “this is not liberal”, he is not understanding (typical of him not to understand some of the most important philosophical issues) he is wrong; it is liberalism, even though the philosophical mediocrity cannot understand that – it is a late stage, hyperbolic liberalization of our borders and boundaries and holding that liberalization in place – it is a weaponized all-American conserving of liberalism until the end of Whites.
We should not place too much faith in Greg Johnson’s snooty, right wing elitism; he is the same guy who called Hitler “a great statesman” in the Lindtner thread at Majorityrights. Johnson seeks lateral discriminatory means to garner audience from the said American demographic; and pandering to these right wing reactionaries is comfortable for this snob.
And as I’ve said before, his lateral snobbery in elitism as opposed to horizontal discrimination on behalf of niches of the racially loyal and sincere, can get him into troubling company; while this enmeshment with the boomer conduit to generation internet bubble and his philosophical mediocrity keeps him wedded to right wing positioning, it also keeps him off the mark in important White Post Modern philosophical concepts.
And Greggy’s ability, which is considerable, has him circulating the false currency of White identity as right wing and more explicitly, against the left. It suits him and others, like Millennial Woes, who place a bit too much concern for audience and market – thus a little of the money backing right identity, probably, as opposed to the proper grounds of White advocacy. Millennial Woes trades the currency back, “people are just going to have to accept that World War II shouldn’t have happened. I apologize to the Germans. Britain and America were on the wrong side, should not have started the war.” Really? If you are going to moan in 20/20 hindsight, how about “the great statesman Hitler” doesn’t start the war?
The issue with right wingers and liberals is that they are being played by Jews.
It is an unfortunate part of this, therefore, that when I am forced to address one right wing expression, such as Nazism, that its proponents, such as Xer Tanstaafl, exacerbated by his STEM tendency to look for “the one thing” that breaks/links the circuit” and false, absolute binary either/ors (unlike the reality of praxis) can double down in playing into the altercast, depicting anti-Nazism as “my big bugger bear”, to use his term applied to myself, like it is my own myopic obsession; and my looking not just at Jews but at holes, vulnerabilities in our philosophical system as my being like Jared (“they look huWhite to me”) Taylor, trying to let Jews into our group system and defense, and naively letting them off the hook.
in fact, I am concerned to shore up our group system and its philosophical advocacy, (which, unlike Jared Taylor’s idea, does not include Jews; and DOES see them as being in profound adversarial position); even if attacking them were the thing to do, how could we be effective in our goals if we are not capable of organizing and defending our system – if its got holes.
And since I like and advocate all European peoples and their national sovereignty; and most importantly from my position, am focused on coordination of our interests, I’d rather not have to deal with Nazism at all (let alone its being my obsessive bugbear, what Tanstaafl is hearing, rather, is annoyance at my having to deal with it at all – I shouldn’t have to), as it is bound to stir up conflict between Europeans, whether by trolls or by true believers – neither of whom I should have to deal with: it should be obvious to anyone who cares about European/White peoples that we are ALL under attack in anti-racism; and that trying to redeem Hitler and Nazism is beyond impractical. It’s cruel, genocidal supremacism, imperialism and excuse making thereof, is not going to allow us to get along, become popular as we show human compassion rather than the iron law of nature, will not facilitate coordination and alliance building among our race, not going to be practical in coordination with other races either
But in my frustration and annoyance with the Nazi trolls and true believers, Tanstaafl is wont to see me on the other side of his false / either or, as if I am fooled or in league with the Jews, like Jarod Taylor, whereas he, and only the Nazi kind, recognize the significance of Jewry as mortal enemy.
That world view would go a long way to alleviating guilt trips that he and people like him may choose to accept (though I don’t know why they would; or reject, which they should) and “justify” Nazi Germany – which they should not try to do; especially not since they are only exercising 20/20 hindsight.
But some people, Xer’s among them, are just smart enough and have the skill set, to keep patching up deeply mistaken philosophy; and they get a lot of confirmation and popular currency through this position, for the largely German and Irish demographic of beleaguered reactionaries, wishing to hear redemptive stories of the Nazis.
Thus intent in the purity spiral, when Tanstaafl tries to pretend that I am obfuscating, that he is a “White winger” (none of this left or right stuff) it may sound clever; but he’s right wing, evidence his standing by Hitler, if nothing else.
Again, it is a problem with the White American boomer demographic, followed by the xers that they have been able to channel as conduits of their right wing message, to the millennials and z’s who await in their internet bubbles buffered from reality and historical testing, is that they are largely of nationalities, German and Irish, susceptible to trade in (what is to them the relief of) the false currency of either/ or “Nazis were the good guys / or you are naively/disingenuously on the side of Jewry” and over sympathy with the Nazis side in their beleaguered reaction to the politically correct onslaught.
Having said that…
Indeed, Dr. Christian Lindtner (debunker of holocaust deniers) asked of me prior to his interview, “you think that Hitler was right about some things, yes?”
I thought it was a fair question to test for a man of reasonable empathy. I answered yes, of course.
In corrective of this regard, we might tip our hat to a truth, at least for most of us, that Boomer James Bowery added by a word of restraint to those who react against this reactionary demographic and facilitate the concordance with Germans and German ethnonatioanlism that we appreciate, as an integral partner in our ethnonatioalist coalition.
“You have to have some sympathy for Nazi Germany and Hitler” (it’s a matter of how much).
Before going whole-assed in absolute non-sympathy for Nazi Germany, let me relate some of my visceral reaction, as I am quite sure that they’d be visceral reactions shared by most any who care about European/White people. Though I’ve said much, I will say more for my visceral reaction against those who try to redeem Hitler. And those who do that, should be aware of the kind of intense hatred that they are generating against them.
While it is true that moaning about the Versailles Treaty’s economic terms as unjust and causative of the WWII is taken for granted, especially among WN; and economic terms aside, I am satisfied that the national lines drawn were not unreasonable, Germans were not the only one’s who suffered population shifts and should be the last people complaining about that (civilian deaths in this process aside, that’s bad) even though I’ve never heard anyone else raise that argument, and the arguments about the source of WWII among WN tend to be so very German biased in terms of Versailles being the problem that I have tended to lose patience, there is an aspect of how enforcement of the Versailles treaty in interwar Germany invokes my empathy, though it is only something that the Treaty allowed for, did not require.
It has to do with the incidence of France bringing-in black soldiers from its colonies to occupy and police the Rhineland. This was the first that blacks would be brought into the nation in any number and the race-mixing would inevitably follow. Adding to the indignity was a reaction to provocations wherein black soldiers went over the border into Germany and shot about twenty Germans.
While from what I understand, Germany was more to blame than other nations for WWI, and I do understand France’s rage over WWI, furthermore, that France was undermanned in their capacity to defend the Rhineland and the rest of France; I do not sympathize with their bringing in blacks to assist in this regard – not at all.
I’m not saying that it was his reasoning, but if I were Hitler, and I saw France bringing in blacks, to take German women, adulterate the population and shoot resisters, I would be ready to invade France, “you think you won that war, hu?” We were just resting. Now we’re going to control you because we have to. Then I suppose I might look east and say, “you think you are going to deploy elite Jews to strategize against German interests, huh?” Now we are going to control you because we have to and because we can.
Of course, I would be mistaken, tactlessly overcompensating where I should, rather, in operating from my new position of strength, cooperate with conservative elements in adjacent nations.
And that is the point of 20/20 hindsight.
I can even understand maybe thinking imperialist supremacism was a cool thing to do at one time, in circumstance. Not now.
Of course the sane perspective of 20/20 hindsight is also, probably first, to look critically upon Germany’s imperialist aspirations in WWI, the brutal results which effected some bad reactions among the French, especially; but with the understanding as to why they, the Belgians et al. would be so angry. Then we can talk about the other side went too far, as in the French bringing blacks into the Rhineland.
The problem is, when it comes to American WN, there is a shocking unanimity of currency. Nazi Germany and Hitler could do no wrong; WWII was everybody else’s fault. Shocking, but that is the line these guys are taking. It’s either that or hey, “why do people criticize Jews?”
I hasten to add that I cannot relate to forced sterilization at all; to me this is the weird, most rogue side of German logic. I can understand de-nationalizing Mulattoes, deporting them, even wanting (i said wanting to, folks) to kill them. But to sterilize them and let them live among you? Weird.
The sane position with regard to Jews, of course, is to see them as a different people from Europeans/Whites (even those with significant European admixture, such as Ashkenazi; and those who see themselves as “White”); a people who are not a part of our group; who have different interests; who generally look after their own interests and have significant power to do so, while they are typically indifferent where not outright antagonistic to our interests – antagonistic which they often are thus,’ the legitimacy for separatism must be the working hypothesis – pursuit of our autonomy and sovereignty from them must be the perspective, not an agenda to murder them: that is neither a practical focus in organizing our sovereignty, which needs to be systemic (an array of concerns not singular focus on Jews, let alone, trying to get people to kill them all), attending to a circle of issues. Nor is tactful in giving Jewry a clear argument that they are legitimized in trying to destroy the threat of White identity and critical separatism from Jewry – the overcompensation of Nazi Germany has already been enough of a weapon against White Nationalism by its association, turning away popular assent to our side.
With a working hypothesis that Jews are another people, with different interests that they can look after for themselves, while we pursue our own autonomy, not an aim to kill them, we may rest comfortably in the court of the gods: even if our hypothesis is a bit off, I.e.. Jews or particular Jews are not that bad, not that responsible for our plight, no irreversible harm done. Thus, we should be more free to pursue our ends in the court of the gods if genocide is not our aim but rather autonomy.
We need to anchor our world view in stabilizing our Praxis system, not expecting everyone to hop-to and start killing Jews.
And between Europeans, It’s not like there is a middle ground between European ethnonationalism and the Nazis. No, the Nazis are out of bounds. You can’t coordinate European peoples with Nazism.
Since we’re exercising 20 20 hindsight, we can see the prudence of coordinating nationalisms as opposed to launching imperialist supremacism…
We can understand how the Nazi regime may have seemed right at the time to Germans in the situation but we have better perspective now. We know that they were not under clear and immanent threat, that other nations were against the Soviets and willing to deport Jews.
Particularly with our demographics susceptible as they are to be overly sympathetic to Nazi Germany, pandered to by both true believers and enemies playing divide and conquer, trading in this false currency, we must be careful and attend to our epistemological premises noting that Wall Street Bob from D.C. had it exactly backwards when he said that Tanstaafl is the “greatest epistemologist.” That is exactly what Tanstaafl is NOT.
Wall Street Bob, a Boomer, is like every WN stuck on the Hitler – they come by way of the very compelling William Luther Pierce (STEM guy, physicist) – who was from the “greatest generation” but nevertheless a guru for boomers who want to redeem Hitler.
The Working Hypothesis of Praxis as Opposed to Scientism.
Bottom line with regard to Jewry: the sane view is to hold that they are a different people with different interests and we must look after ours by means of separatism, pursing our autonomy; the working hypothesis of the need for our pursuit of sovereignty and corresponding need for separatism from Jewry is increased significantly in its legitimacy by the clear statement that our objective is separatism and functional systemic autonomy, not to kill and eliminate Jewry.
We may proceed comfortably with this working hypothesis as it is innocent enough: even if hypotheses about Jewish antagonism are demonstrated to be a bit off, irreversible damage is far less likely to be done to anybody.
We are also far more likely to gain popular and powerful support in defending ourselves if we are attacked while innocently pursuing our sovereignty.
While we might even understand their rage, certainly the association with Nazism’s overcompensations has been one of the greatest stigmatizing and inhibiting factors in the pursuit of ethnonationalism; association with denial and its redemptionism only tend to make the ethnonationalist cause look worse, egregiously dishonest. Therefore, it is necessary to necessary to counter those who would try to associate Nazism with White Nationalism, to reject it and to demonstrate why it makes perfect sense to do so.
Tansstaafl might feel good taking that angle and it logically “justifies” Nazism and Hitler, relieving him of his guilt trips, but it isn’t just tactless, though it is that, it is to partake of a massive epistemological blunder.
A convulsive, stasis over correction to the parasitic destruction is not what we need, and those who try redeem that are not just bad optics, they are reacting into a fool’s game.
After all, systemic autonomy is what we want, sovereignty. How Jews might interfere is in part a separate issue where we have any agency at all, and we do. On the other hand, we lose much agency when we engage the causative, “that’s just the way it is” arguments of the right, and react over the top, fixing to kill all the Jews. It has been said that war is a Jew harvest and if we’re not careful to be in systemic balance and correctivity, we are likely to get a large percentage of our quality people killed, if not getting our qualitative species basically destroyed while the historical result of this approach has only been to increase their more virulent types in horizontal transmission. Finally, of course, as it is more clear to the public through our stated objectives and practices that our aim is sovereignty from, not genocide over others, we are warranted to defend ourselves and draw upon support in our defense.
At the same time and with that, our free speech, even where quite critical, ought to be perceived as less of a threat and less cause to clamp down on our freedoms.
It’s a false either /or to say that the Jews are singularly responsible for our problems (as Tanstaafl veritably maintains) or that our problems are almost singularly our fault (as Jared Taylor maintains); and I am definitely not on Jared Taylor’s side (decidedly not). Nevertheless, part of Tan’s flare up with me came with the idea that I was siding with Jared Taylor’s concept of “pathological altruism” which seeks to put all blame for the plight of Whites in their abnormal psychology… I will not allow myself and my platform to be depicted that way (big hero Tanstaafl) but there are holes and vulnerabilities in our system, its philosophy do have to be corrected.
So let me go there next, my experience of Tanstaafl as an obstruction to this correction.
In a marvelous tour de force, Paul Weston exposed the absurdity of Britain’s hate-speech laws by getting himself arrested on the steps of Winchester Abbey, reciting Churchill – specifically, Churchill’s statement about Muslims (The incident occurred in April of 2014).
The quoted Churchill speech regarding Muslims.
“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property – either as a child, a wife, or a concubine – must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the faith: all know how to die but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith.”
– Winston Churchill
Posted by Guessedworker on Sun, 27 Apr 2014 19:13 | #
Paul is a very thoughtful guy, and I don’t doubt that he thought through the Winchester action carefully.
However, the question is: on what grounds was he arrested? If for breach of the peace, he would have to be saying something that might cause a riot. Unlikely on a quiet morning in well-to-do Winchester. If for hate speech in some form, he’s free and clear without any doubt if he was only reading from Churchill’s text. Unlawful assembly is out because it doesn’t apply, I think. That leaves local by-laws, since Paul was standing on council-owned property. But, ordinarily, the police would not arrest someone making a political protest on council property. So it’s all a bit odd.
Posted by Guessedworker on Sun, 27 Apr 2014 19:22 | #
Morgoth, welcome to the site. I have admired your work in the thread wars for a long time. I am very pleased Daniel has opened the doors to you.
Posted by Morgoth on Sun, 27 Apr 2014 21:06 | #
Thanks GW, and Daniel for making this a main post.
Whether or not it is related I can’t say but Paul’s Party recently tried to update their manifesto moving into the upcoming Euro elections, the Electoral Commission rejected the Party’s manifesto. Unfortunately I can’t find the rejection letter but George Whale has published the reply sent back to the Electoral Commission here:
The idea that a Party can have it’s policies rejected on the grounds that they are ‘‘offensive’’ has deeper implications for the growing number of dissident parties.
The article on Paul’s arrest has already gained 10x the amount of comments, and presumably reads, than other articles on his Party’s site so once again we see the death spiral of Liberalism in action, this time it’s a real peach, an Englishman arrested for quoting Churchill (!) The system creates dissidents, the system clamps down on the dissidents and thereby creates far more dissidents.
I posted this on the main DT comment piece:
‘’ Yesterday Paul Weston who is a regular commentor here was arrested for reciting a speech by Winston Churchill. This is the ‘‘Tolerant’’ Britain we now have, a country where repeating a speech by the man who was voted ‘‘The Greatest Briton of all time’’ will get you arrested.
And yet on threads like this the totally insane Liberal Left still argue that ‘‘we’’ and not ‘‘they’’ are the problem.’‘
It gained 75 ‘‘recommends’’ within 30 minutes and was then removed and the entire board shut down, needless to say it doesn’t even come close to an infringement of ‘‘house rules’‘.
The system is starting to appear brittle, like cold toffee.
Posted by Selous Scout on Mon, 28 Apr 2014 01:20 | #
The arms of those cops look awfully thin.
Posted by tom metzger on Mon, 28 Apr 2014 11:23 | #
Bravo! A Brit with balls!!!!! Terrible Tommy
Posted by Guessedworker on Mon, 28 Apr 2014 16:30 | #
Paul deliberately forgot to mention to the investigating officer that he was quoting verbatim from Winston Churchill’s writings. He was seeking to provoke an arrest, and to prove that the legal system, corrupted by pee-cee and anti-racism as it is, would blunder into action against the words and meanings of perhaps the greatest hero of the British people.
So this was a challenge to the legal system. If the system doesn’t like it and tries to take him to trial, he will be able to elect to go before a jury at, presumably, Winchester Crown Court. There is no way that the Crown Prosecution Service could risk that. The legal officers involved in doing so would be exposing themselves to some very heavy political fire when the jury finds for Paul – which it certainly would.
Either way, the nett effect is that Paul will be free to repeat the Churchill quote as much as he wants. The hands of the system will have been tied a little, and all power to him for that.
Posted by Trainspotter on Mon, 28 Apr 2014 23:39 | #
Guessedworker: “He was seeking to provoke an arrest, and to prove that the legal system, corrupted by pee-cee and anti-racism as it is, would blunder into action against the words and meanings of perhaps the greatest hero of the British people.”
Quite clever, if that’s the case. Hat’s off to Paul Weston. I’m only familiar with him through a couple of speeches that I’ve seen on video, but I was impressed.
Posted by wobbly on Tue, 29 Apr 2014 18:00 | #
Amazingly the police chief told Paul off the record that England is already in an ‘‘unofficial war’‘.
If correct that’s big – not that it’s true, it’s been true for years but that a senior po-leece would say it.
Posted by Jon on Wed, 30 Apr 2014 19:22 | #
That excerpt from Churchill is one big non causa pro causa fallacy. It’s not unlike blaming “cannabilism” for why Bassongos act like Bassongos. As if if Muslims would only convert to atheism or Christianity, all untoward customs and behaviour would disappear.
Posted by Leon Haller on Wed, 30 Apr 2014 19:51 | #
If a Churchillian criticism of Islam is not to be permitted to be voiced in officially Christian England, that is a big deal.
I don’t know what it will taken to awaken Europeans. I find Europe’s “racial” problems utterly baffling – I mean, the fact that Europeans in their own homelands tolerate crap from nonwhites. America is a completely different situation in every sense, beginning with the presence “on the ground” of nonwhites, which antedated the Founding. One can understand, if not exonerate, white race liberals in the US. However poorly behaved our blacks might be, they do have an ‘excuse’ for being here, which in turn renders the white liberal desire for “racial justice” at least intelligible.
But how can Europeans tolerate nonwhites wrecking their countries, when there is no excuse for a nonwhite presence in Europe? There ought to be 90+% support for terminating immigration, and at least majority support for reclamation-via-repatriation.
Which simply takes us back to the grim empirical diagnosis that there is something racially aberrant about the white race, considered collectively …
Posted by Trainspotter on Thu, 01 May 2014 00:39 | #
Leon Haller: “But how can Europeans tolerate nonwhites wrecking their countries, when there is no excuse for a nonwhite presence in Europe?”
Leon, I used to think this way too. I remember first learning about non-white immigration to Europe when I was a kid back in the 80s. I distinctly recall thinking, “Are they crazy?” Why would they inflict this misery and stupidity upon themselves? I understood immediately that America had created its own racial problems, and we therefore had to deal with it, but it simply made no sense whatsoever that Europe would do this to itself.
Now, of course, I understand that we whites are being subjected to a racial attack at an international scale, and therefore the struggle for our people is inherently an international one. What I didn’t understand at that time, but do now, is that the anti-white liberal (by this I mean the garden variety types, not those that are at the top and orchestrating all of this) is not a rational being. Certainly, he is far more akin to a cultist than a rational man. What he believes doesn’t need to make sense. He is fundamentally hostile to the continuity of the European peoples, and if he lacks a good reason to justify this, he’ll just make one up. Any ludicrous reason will do, or none at all. Arguing with them reveals this bizarre nature.
Not too long ago, Jesse Jackson visited Sweden, unless my memory fails me. He told a group of liberal Swedes that Sweden must become a multiracial society, and the justification for this seemed to be that some Swedish ships were supposedly involved in the slave trade. Even if true, even if a handful of Swedish sailors and merchants were involved, by what utter madness does one conclude that an entire people must be swamped with Africans? That an entire people must become Africanized hybrids? It’s beyond mad hatter insanity, but the Swedish liberals ate it up. They grinned and applauded the good reverend.
Really sickening stuff, but also bizarre. Again, madness.
It’s so insane, so grotesquely evil, that it baffles the mind that any sentient creature could believe such a thing. But the anti-whites do so believe. None of it has to make the least bit of sense, which is why Americans who think that they have to argue over Indians or slavery are missing the point. The anti-white cultist doesn’t actually care about any of that stuff, any more than the anti-whites in Europe do. The are immune to reason and evidence, they are cultists, and we must separate from them entirely.
Posted by wobbly on Fri, 02 May 2014 21:20 | #
@Trainspotter
But the anti-whites do so believe. None of it has to make the least bit of sense, which is why Americans who think that they have to argue over Indians or slavery are missing the point. The anti-white cultist doesn’t actually care about any of that stuff, any more than the anti-whites in Europe do. The are immune to reason and evidence, they are cultists
You’re right that sense and logic aren’t relevant. However what is critical to them is that they believe themselves to be moral. That’s their weak spot.
Posted by Thorn on Thu, 15 May 2014 15:17 | #
This is what we are up against. Such people cannot process the idea that liberal “compassion” and “empathy” have to go out of the window if our people are to survive.
What we are up against are people whose thinking is overridden by emotion. They comprise the masses. OTOH we are driven by reason and logic. Facts and evidence matter to us. Facts and evidence matter not to liberal do-gooders. They don’t care how disastrous the outcome of their illogical endeavors; the only thing that matters to them is their good intensions. As it stands now, we are vastly outnumbered.
Posted by DanielS on Thu, 15 May 2014 15:47 | #
There’s the Ilana Mercer, “White psychology’s suicidal tendency”, meme again.
Not that Christianity disrupts logical thinking and assertive concern for self interest in this life or anything.
Posted by wobbly on Thu, 15 May 2014 22:51 | #
Either way, does anyone think the oligarchs are going to give up their wealth and power in exchange for such “trivial matters” as preventing the white race from going extinct?
They always do. They are driven to concentrate wealth – mostly out of evolved paranoia – but an economy can’t function if wealth is too concentrated so round and round it goes in a cycle.
Posted by wobbly on Fri, 16 May 2014 04:59 | #
Your original point.
does anyone think the oligarchs are going to give up their wealth and power
My answer to that is they always (involuntarily) give up their wealth and power by destroying the basis of their wealth and power. They always cut the branch they’re sitting on.
#
Separate to that is whether or not in the process of losing their wealth and power this time – as they always do – they will have done enough damage to permanently destroy the host population.
I agree that part is different this time.
Although that’s now new historically either: you can follow their progress through history by following the chain of once impressive ex civilizations starting with Saba that became African admixed and stagnant.
Posted by Kumiko Oumae on Tue, 28 Jul 2015 06:07 | #
Speaking of wedge issues, this is another wedge issue that is coming up just north of where Weston is, and which has been developing for a while now. There is the fact that the ‘gay rights’ issue has evolved to the stage where ‘gay rights’ are now associated with what they call ‘white privilege’, because Muslims don’t like gay people and so rubbing it in their faces is now considered to be a form of oppression directed against what they regard as a marginalised group.
Breitbart, ‘Swedish Nationalists Plan Gay Pride March Through Muslim Area: Left Is Outraged’, 23 Jul 2015: (emphasis)
[…] Organisers said there was no dress code, adding: “You could take the opportunity to tan your belly and legs in the sunny weather.”However, angry left wing and gay rights activists have taken to Facebook, denouncing the planned pride march as “right wing”, “xenophobic” and “pure racism”.
A counter-demonstration is now planned, with organisers claiming Järva Pride “pits two oppressed groups against one another.”Taxpayer-funded gay rights group RFSL has distanced itself from the pride march, accusing it of promoting racism and white privilege, while some activists are even calling for the organisers to be arrested for “hate speech”. […]
Of course, it is difficult to understand how Muslims could be an oppressed or marginalised group, considering that they hold institutional power in a whole region of the world called ‘MENA’ (Middle East and North Africa), and have a large population of adherents as well as being one of the world’s largest and most overbearingly oppressive religions. A religion which asserts that all other gods are ‘false’, other than their own.
The fact that there is a situation where the liberal establishment is defending that religion in European lands, shows how far the Overton Window has been dragged.
Posted by DanielS on Tue, 28 Jul 2015 06:34 | #
It’s a good idea to use this as a wedge issue.
Queers are a very small part of our populations and clearly a practical place to make a concession (since their small presence is inevitable) when choosing a side to take in order to exploit a contradiction in liberalism and drive a wedge against Islam.
We can freak-out the Mulims, cause significant consternation in the liberal world view and crucially, wedge against “conservatives” altogether as they are, as you say, conserving liberalism and universalism, e.g., through Christianity.
Bone chilling address of CPAC (Conservative Political Action Committee of America) by Paul Weston, in which he warns America not to look toward Europe as the homeland that will always be there –
“We in England look to Sweden in the way that America should be looking to Britain, because Sweden is literally a lost country …we in England have maybe two decades before everything hits the wall” …
“This denial of what Islam is, is going to be the downfall of Europe.”
“And because I’m English I’m going to have to talk to you very briefly before I wrap-up about what happened with the raping and grooming gangs that we have had for the last twenty years in Great Britain; but only finally made the news last year; and it was broken by a guy called Andrew Norfaulk, who is a Times journalist.
And the reason he knew about it, the police knew about it, the politicians knew about it, but none of them wanted to talk about it because that would cause some sort of ‘community un-cohesion’ ..and community tensions.
Now, I think it is much more likely that you will get community tensions when your local girls and sisters and daughters are being raped and groomed and tortured; and the police won’t talk about it. I think that is much more conducive to community tension than actually telling the truth about it when it could have been stopped way back in 1990.
And I don’t know what you know about the British National Party and Nick Griffin – who has some sins that I can’t forgive him for – but Nick Griffin actually came out and said many years ago, I think in 2004/5, he told the truth about these Muslim grooming gangs.
And the response of the British government was not to investigate, and not to look out for these girls; all of these girls, by-the-way, were in care – they were vulnerable young girls; and they’re not sixteen or eighteen; these girls went from seven to thirteen years of age – and as I’m talking about it now, the police would be called to a hotel, where thirteen Muslim men were in a room with a naked twelve year old girl under the table; and a very irate father outside the front of the hotel. And the police would arrest the father!
This is how bad it is.
I’ve rather gone off track but the Muslim grooming thing, I think, is really the icing on the cake in terms of what they are allowed to get away with; and what our reaction is politically from the politicians, from the police, the media – because they all colluded in covering-it-up – I was talking about Nick Griffin and – the Times journalist when he broke the story in 2014, said the reason they had sat on this story for so many years was because they did not want to give any ammunition to the nasty fascist, right-wing political organizations in Britain.
Which is absolutely disgusting.
I’m rambling, but my point really is that Britain is not yet lost.
We’re not far-off being lost – Sweden’s gone, Sweden is just a matter of five or ten years – Britain can still maybe do something about this.
But I don’t think it will be resolved peacefully.
I think probably we’ll be looking at a civil war scenario, in the same way that Yugoslavia broke-up in the 1990’s. ..and the civil war in Lebanon in the 1970’s.
I think this is the future of Europe generally speaking.
And I think that when it happens it will not be contained in the way that Yugoslavia was able to be contained.
It’s going to be cataclysmic.
Something that people cannot imagine, really, living in modern, democratic times.
But it’s coming.
And I will finish simply by saying, you all need to look at what’s happening in Britain and Sweden and Europe; and you all need to make sure that you retain your First Amendment Rights because unless we can talk about this, unless we can bring it out in the open, you in America will go the same way.
You need to stand up and look at what we’re doing and say this is never gong to happen here!”
Posted by The Sordid Origin of Hate-Speech Laws on Sun, 03 Feb 2019 18:19 | #
Hoover Institution, 1 Dec 2019:
The Sordid Origin of Hate-Speech Laws
All western european countries have hate-speech laws. In 2008, the eu adopted a framework decision on “Combating Racism and Xenophobia” that obliged all member states to criminalize certain forms of hate speech. On the other side of the Atlantic, the Supreme Court of the United States has gradually increased and consolidated the protection of hate speech under the First Amendment. The European concept of freedom of expression thus prohibits certain content and viewpoints, whereas, with certain exceptions, the American concept is generally concerned solely with direct incitement likely to result in overt acts of lawlessness.
Yet the origin of hate-speech laws has been largely forgotten. The divergence between the United States and European countries is of comparatively recent origin. In fact, the United States and the vast majority of European (and Western) states were originally opposed to the internationalization of hate-speech laws. European states and the U.S. shared the view that human rights should protect rather than limit freedom of expression.
Rather, the introduction of hate-speech prohibitions into international law was championed in its heyday by the Soviet Union and allies. Their motive was readily apparent. The communist countries sought to exploit such laws to limit free speech.
[…]
The Soviet proposal would be targeted not just at Nazism but against agitation in favor of capitalism and liberal democracy.
Although Article 19 of the udhr does not contain a specific limitation clause, it is still possible to restrict freedom of expression pursuant to general limitation clauses contained in the udhr. Article 7 ensures equality before the law and protects specifically against incitement to discrimination, while Article 29 includes a general limitation clause according to which the rights in the udhr may be limited, inter alia, for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others.
The drafting of Article 7 started in the Sub-Commission on the Prevention of Discrimination and the Protection of Minorities. The Soviet Union presented a proposal that included an obligation to prohibit “Any advocacy of national, racial, or religious hostility or of national exclusiveness or hatred and contempt, as well as any action establishing a privilege or a discrimination based on distinctions of race, nationality, or religion constitute a crime and shall be punishable under the law of the state.” The U.S. and Belgian experts vociferously opposed this proposal and sought to prevent a vote upon it. However, France came up with an extensive proposal requiring states to punish infringements of the principle of nondiscrimination. Ultimately Australia and China presented a draft compromise provision that sought to condemn only incitement to violence against minorities, which was adopted with ten votes and one abstention in the Sub-Commission.
Despite the adoption of this compromise, the Soviet delegate continued the fight for limiting freedom of expression in the Working Group of the Human Rights Commission. The Soviet delegate held a speech in which he declared that without a prohibition against hate speech “any Declaration would be useless.” This led to a reiteration of the above-mentioned Soviet proposal on Article 7, which was rejected, though very narrowly this time, with two votes to two, with two abstentions. During the second session of the Human Rights Commission, the Soviet delegate tried once more to submit the proposal, and this time the Belgian representative took it into consideration. He rejected the Soviet proposal but amended the current version of Article 7 with the phrase “and against any incitement to such discrimination,” which was adopted with a great majority.
However, in the third session of the Human Rights Commission, the British and Indian delegates jointly proposed to delete the prohibition against incitement to discrimination since “the United Kingdom, feeling morally bound to carry out the provision of the Declaration, would be obliged to pass laws which experience had shown were neither necessary nor desirable.”
Countries supporting the British/Indian stand included the U.S., while the French representative strongly favored a prohibition against incitement to discrimination. He was joined by, inter alia, the delegation from Yugoslavia, who felt that “incitement to discrimination should be explicitly forbidden.”
The dominant force behind the attempt to adopt an obligation to restrict freedom of expression was the Soviet Union.
Posted by Adrean on Mon, 04 Feb 2019 14:09 | #
Adrean Arlott of Compulsory Diversity News to the Rescue
John Dlugosz: The people will decide what is relevant. The First Selectman has said, “I feel (Anna Zubkova) deceived us by omission and I feel misled. I’m pulling my support and telling my friends and family to do the same. The signs on my lawn are coming up. There’s a lot of good people who made a decision to support her without having all the information they needed.”
I believe ignoring evil–in one’s country, state, town, and certainly under one’s own roof–is unacceptable. Is hatred and fear-mongering and ignorance a family value? Read the content of the blog and it’s very clear Mr Freeman believes the world would be a better place if his beliefs were imposed on us all.
I choose to speak out against hatred and stand up to it, because I’ve suffered too. But I was brought up a Christian, and my family values are love and forgiveness, and having the courage to stand up to hatred and bigotry. Understanding and compassion will always overcome hatred and aggression. That’s a value this country was founded on. To my way of thinking, those who choose to turn a blind eye to evil are either ignorant or disingenuous. Either way, I pity them. The good people of eastern Connecticut will decide what is relevant, and what they value in their leaders.
Peace.
Adrean Arlott: Dlugosz, Anna is running to be a probate judge. I don’t think the ability to sense evil is part of the job description. You say you are a Christian. Tell me, what was it like serving on the Salem Witch Trials? Sensing evil must have been a big part of that job. Was your buckle hat really as itchy as it looked?
Posted by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn on Mon, 04 Feb 2019 15:11 | #
Counter Currents, “Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn: The Rise of a Prophet”, 4 Feb 2019:
by Spencer J. Quinn
It’s striking how cherry-picking can hone the pen of a propagandist and disguise malice behind a veneer of reason. Jewish writer Cathy Young provides excellent examples of this all throughout her December 2018 Quillette article, “Solzhenitsyn: The Fall of a Prophet.” Published shortly after Solzhenitsyn’s 100th birthday, the article’s point, essentially, is to tarnish the reputation of a great man in order to steer discourse away from aspects of his work which the current zeitgeist finds problematic. Her shoddy, dishonest treatment of Solzhenitsyn resembles Soviet-styled political revisionism, and it stinks, frankly, of character assassination.
While proudly wearing my “fourteen words jacket, complete with my personally designed 14 in-the-gap logo, together with David Lane’s phrase, “we must secure the existence of our people and a future for White children”…
Story number 1
A not so anecdotal experience related to this jacket.
It’s some time in 2009. I walked into the grand opening of an ‘Irish bar’ in Poznan, Poland. Proudly wearing this jacket…
I made sure to stand front and center while watching the band so that everyone in attendance could read my jacket.
Thinking nothing of it (why would I, after all? Who could object to the survival of White children?), I went to the bar to procure a drink.
Suddenly, the answer – immediately obvious to me, anyway – came walking-up behind me: Two individuals speaking frantically. And the answer to the aforementioned question was automatic in my mind …when they said/asked me with aggressive disdain, “hey shit-eater, what is that shit on your back?” and added presumptuously, “Go back to your own country!”
Without even having turned around, not turning around in fact – not even having seen them yet – I responded instantaneously, “This is my country, go back to Israel.”
The zen master (lol) knew the answer to the aforementioned question, a nonsensical question really – who could object to White children? There is only one answer.
When I turned around and looked at them it was confirmed indeed that they had dark curly hair, boner noses, etc, indeed fit the bill. They turned and looked at each other in disbelief that I had known instantaneously, without hesitation where they were coming from.
As their aggression had apparently never failed them before, they tried their tried-and-true verbatim once again:
“Shit-eater, what is that shit on your back?”
I responded, what would you like it to be?
They repeated, “go back to your own country!”
And I repeated once again, “this is my country, go back to Israel.”
They looked at each other again in shock, as if to say, “what now?” and they went away.
The bar location failed (Tanner’s moved to another place), but I have a strong suspicion that the property was owned, as many properties are owned in Poland, by the YKW. These YKW were probably a party to YKW who owned the place and were charging an exorbitant rent, not at all concerned if one or another business makes it, or if they break their backs, as they usually do, no matter how well, how qualitative and competently run – provided that business tenants slave away and squander their dreams to pay rents in backwater Poznan that are on par with Paris and New York – “hear that, ‘shit eater.”?
The YKW said that to me, seeing this jacket on behalf of White children. Hear that, “shit eater” ?
Story number 2
I walk into the bar right across from the ratusz in Poznan central square, wearing the jacket….
While waiting to buy a drink at he bar I hear an English speaking guy ask me in curiosity, “what was that on my back?” … he did not pose the question in a particularly hostile way at first, so I figured this was being presented as a liberal student-ish thing…but seeing as the jacket’s statement is rather self explanatory, I called his bluff and asked what he would like it to be? He replied with another question, is it racist? I notice dark, curly hair on this one too, asking that question I figure here we go again and indeed…
He then twice loudly blurts-out “racist, racist!”
I think I told him to fuck off or something, and then he turns to the bar woman as she comes to take my order, and he says to her, “this guy’s a racist!”…
I was pleasantly surprised to find that she simply ignored him, in fact everyone at the bar ignored him, as if he was the asshole, which obviously, he was… and that’s not the half of it…
I see that this guy moves to a group of liberal English guys that I know from the university….a famous gossip mill and famously jerkish guys who pander to women with aggressive liberalism and “anti-racism”…
I decided to calmly finish my drink and go to another bar where I would not have to be in the presence of their obnoxious company.
As I am walking out..the (one can only suppose) YKW guy screams, “racist, racist, racist!”…
At this point those who wield the charge of racism as a weapon are not quite getting the idea that they are the assholes but it remains a weapon even if its local support is minimal in this context…
Anyway, I go to a bar where there is more local clientele so that I can peacefully have a few more …vodkas, scotches – not sure, this was a while ago, also 2009.
But there are lots of places around and sometimes I feel like I should try something different; so after that, I went to a bar a few blocks away that I virtually never go to – had been there briefly, maybe twice in five years, don’t even think I stayed for a drink when I had popped-in…
It’s a basement bar that features karaoke, and I hear the karaoke as I descend the stairs, turn the corner into the bar and immediately lock eyes with (I now know his name is Adam) the same guy! – and he has the karaoke microphone in his hand in amidst the crowded bar! He screams into the microphone, “racist!, racist! racist!”…
I saw the liberal English guys with him and just turned on my heals and marched back up the steps out of there…but you have to realize that the Cohencidence was not small….
This is a city of 500,000 and there are hundreds of bars to choose from, dozens in this area that serve similar demographics… you are not exactly limited in your options…
…..
Anyway, some weeks later, I’m passing through the rynek and there is a corner bar where one of the guys who I happen to get along with a bit better invites me in for a shot after telling me profusely that he doesn’t agree with me but respects my conviction….
I go in and there’s the same crowd of guys, including Adam, this time a bit more sheepish – he’d stay away in the corner the episode; I guess the Englishmen had told him that I’m not quite so insubstantial…
But one of the English guys, “Shanny”, comes forward and says, “do you want me to kick your ass?” … I said “try it”…and then I looked to the crowd, especially Paul N. an ugly ginger who panders to women into liberal hyperbole (Paul was there the night of the first incident in the Irish bar and I heard him talking to friends about me and my jacket, saying “racist as they come”….)
Aggressive liberals like him are among my least favorite people in the world.
And so I looked at this crowd and I said, if you want diversity go back to Birmingham (where Shanny is from), go back to Liverpool (where Adam is from), go to Brighton (where Ed is from) go back to England – (I do not wish “diversity” on you, but don’t you impose it by me), I’m not stopping you from going there to your “diversity”. I came here to be with my family.
A couple of them shook my hand as a peace offering, particularly the one guy from Cornwall, who invited me in, who I get along with a little better… and I went on my way….
……..
When substituting for a semester, at the university five years prior, I was trying to impart to my class the importance of social classification, the necessity of it, even.. and how it (social classification) had been egregiously prohibited by the American Constitution…
However, the following week from assigning that lesson for consideration, I got stuck in France, having had car accident that wrecked my car… and Paul took my class in which I had intended to follow up on this lesson…
In conversation somewhere after I came back, Paul blurted out to me, “why do you see it as necessary to clAAssify!”
What an asshole. What a thing to impart to my class, my Polish people. Paul, you ignorant, ugly bastard, I hate you.
..
So for the next class I had my class write down a “poem” that I’d written – I put it on the chalk board for the class to copy – it was about Paul and Patrick – Patrick being a teacher there as well, an American guy from North Dakota, jerkish as well, taking ‘racism’ for granted as a great problem and giving his classes assignments in its terms…
My poem:
P and P couldn’t get any P in their Previous Places, so they Pandered to it in Poland, One P (Patrick) Pontificating about Prejudice as Prehistoric Platitude while the other P (Paul) Proffered the Preferability of the Previous President (Clinton), the Penultimate Panderer to P.
What an asshole Paul is; and of course I heard that the female students “all like him” (despite his being an ugly fuck)….and he was hired-on as a permanent at the University…
(not that I wanted to be – didn’t pay very well, gossip mill, liberal pressure, grammar – boring, etc.).
So that’s that; and all these guys, I’m told, don’t like me because, they say, “he’s a racist.”
One’s a journalist named Ed, and he actually wrote a column saying how a Nigerian guy who’d somehow managed to become a member of Polish parliament, while having a Polish wife and four mulatto kids, represented “a good start.”
I wrote to TT Metzger asking for advice as to how to deal with such an idiot.
Metzger publishes an article with a big picture of Ed in his web news section, “Traitor Ed ****** in Poland!”, followed by my statement about what an idiot that Ed is and my question about what to do?…. I was shocked – massive face palm – to see this published so flamboyantly, but figured that it was a fairly obscure publication and it would blow-over in obscurity …but not quite; turns out that Ed did see it sometime later… oops! Well, Ed, if the truth isn’t a defense, it should be..
………
Coming back to stories of my jacket…..
There is one more negative one to impart
Story number 3)
You are not supposed to use the word “unique” when writing for good reason – because almost nothing is.
But Dragon Bar in Przemek’s Hill has a uniqueness about it that has allowed me to go there once, sometimes twice or three times a week for years – I mean years – without getting tired of it:
It’s a phenomenon really, and I cannot explain how it happens, but it does happen that ….
You can go to this bar a couple times a week for years…there will be dozens, hundreds of people there, depending upon the hour… and you will never see more than maybe a few people that you’ve seen before..
Not only that, but the people are a consistent demographic: middle class, on the bohemian side, but normal enough …and always 95% to 100% White. What’s more, its a comfortable place – you can dress casual and relax in its comfortable rock and jazz atmosphere….
So, I liked the place….
Naturally, I would wear my 14 words jacket there…
I started getting some feedback as I sat on a bar stool… some curiosity around, but one pretty girl stood next to me as if to defend me and say that she would stand by this, more than figuratively.
Then a really cool thing – a fine blond started beaming smiles at me like I’d never seen before… huge smile and beaming eyes! She’d obviously seen things in other parts of Europe that she didn’t like and was very happy for my dissent.
Some time later, a big guy who’d been in that part of the bar gave me a robust two taps on my shoulder in approval as he passed-by.
……
The next time in Dragon with the jacket was not quite so positive, however…
One of the two owners is YKW …the other likes me; not that I had any problems or altercations with the YKW owner, but you know, advocating Whites, I guess that’s enough from his point of view.
So, what happens is that he sends a fellow YKW who is a mutual acquaintance, who tries to give me this lecture about how he loves people from everywhere.. I sort of knew what this was about and, not needing a lecture on “celebrating diversity”, I not too politely asked him to get away from me.
Then these two blond kids came up, very aggressively, into my space (I’m wearing the jacket) and one said to me, “this is Poland, you can’t be a racist here.” … I looked at him like he was the asshole that he is and moved to the courtyard outside. He follows me out and won’t get out of my face… so I yell at him, “look, if you want to suck ****** **** go ahead! Get away from me!” Some of the women around were mortified… a long time bouncer who’s watching this asks me “where’s your swastika?” …he asks me that twice and I answer him twice that I don’t have swastika and I’m not a Nazi; I walked out of the bar, knowing that if I don’t stay away for a while, this could ruin my chance to come back to one of my favorite haunts when I like… So, l I did stay away for a while, but would see the other owner and he’d shake my hand as he always has any time he sees me on the street…
…and I go back to Dragon when I like.
Upon return a Canadian guy with a mulatto daughter looked at me with a little bit of fear when he saw the jacket…
A blond girl who’d lived in England for a while came up to me incredulous, asking, “White children? ….White children”? – ! – as in, why specifically White?!? She couldn’t believe it! I would have liked to have said, yeah, as in not the same color as ****, but I didn’t want to push my luck; and just said, yeah, White children…
One of the aforementioned English guys implored me to “take that jacket off.” I told him I wouldn’t; that was that.
……………………
Generally speaking, I have found the jacket to function very well, because it does the speaking for me, without my having to be aggressive or impose myself in any risky sense – after all, who would object to securing White children? (oh, that’s right, We Know Who)
…. but it works nevertheless, very subtly, even for intervening…
For example, a pretty French girl was passing through the rynek with her negro boyfriend and I casually strolled in front of them….
That is, at least it was a way of making a statement… it eats me up when I otherwise can’t say anything…
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White children.
Because the beauty of the White Aryan woman must not perish from the earth.
…last Story, 4)
Right by the beer refrigerator where this picture was taken, a couple of fair Polish guys came up to me and hugged me! ..a perfect stranger! and asked me where I’m from; this ain’t no gay bar either … because the beauty of the White Aryan woman….).
Sex as Sacrament / Sex as Celebration…Sex as Natural Fact and other stories Part 1
“The whore of Babylon is drunk with the blood of the saints.”
Actually, the analogy is not far off from our present situation. In the disordered world, the anti-world, a “Babylon,” where YKW and liberal unconcern for our White class is the rule, sex disconfirms the worthy, destroys the precious and brings into being the vicious, the irresponsible at our expense.
It isn’t funny.
Anti-racism is anti-group classification. It is Cartesian. It is not innocent. It is prejudice. It is hurting and it is killing people.
Anti-racism is anti-group classification, in weaponized form, an Alinsky-like weaponization – using quote, our rules against us – specifically of Cartesianism on the empiricist end, the Lockeatine empiricist end in its prejudice against social classification, alleging them to be non-empirical fiction; thus, a prejudice against prejudice in favor of supposedly pure individual perception and rights thereof, as opposed to discriminatory accountability through posited social classification – a race being a social classification writ large.
Male and female remain the primary de facto classification in necessary pychological function of categorization to make coherent sense where racism, that is to say, where racial classification and discrimination thereupon is prohibited.
The pandering that results from all angles to our co-evolutionary young females and the increased one up position that they find themselves in as gate keepers in this situation disordered of White bounds exacerbates their inclination to incite genetic competition; as they are pandered to ad nauseum from all angles from males previously blocked. Further, the puerile female will be inclined to welcome this liberalism as it increases her power, if only in short term.
How to counter these hate infested Mulatto-supremacists?
To begin we need to correct this violation of our people’s boundaries, the human ecological disaster and even genocide it implicates, practical matters of border and boundary control need to be addressed. We need to counter the stigmatization of ethnonationalism, to counter political rules given to liberalization of our boundaries and moreover, anti-racism which has gone so far as to criminalize our self defense as peoples.
Furthermore, to build our morale and facilitate loyalty to our people against this onslaught against us, provisions would be of great help that facilitate both free and careful assessment of partner selection, but also to know that our systems are responsible enough to ensure the institutionalization of these requirements – to facilitate optimal freedom in partner selection, border control is necessary – in that way, your people are free for a sufficiently natural liberalism with regard to sex with decreased risk, as your partners are fairly similar and accountable from an evolutionary standpoint; you are also free to mix with other races but you are risking your White group membership through such transgression, as you are not free to just impose that degree of liberalization upon the group boundaries; optimal freedom of choice will also be assured by the institutionalized provision, so to speak, for single sex partner for life hopefuls; with the added assistance therein, to help assess appropriateness in partner selection.
After setting about to establish our group(s) homeostasis, that is to say, systemic maintenance as European peoples, ranking perhaps only second in priority, but what will inevitably prove to be integral to border and boundary maintenance, will be a realistic negotiation of the issue of sex – part of which will account not just for its brute factual nature and sufficient freedom of more experimental expression, but that we as individuals and as a group require provision, a respected option for our human capacity of more careful recourse and accountability – viz., to justice to our genetic and human ecological capital not only in the broad scope of our national citizenship; but moreover, in option to treat sex and monogamy as sacred, recognized, institutionalized and normalized by society as a significant option, to provide for an even more careful selective process for those who wish; corresponding with the important transcendence of the episodic and momentary evaluation – that can fall down to superficial evaluative criteria resulting from a boundless, liberal free for all; corresponding typically with a scientistic take on sex, naturalistic fallacy; e.g., that it is nothing more than a normal bodily function; the kind of take on sex that can be liberating from insanely restrictive traditions and taboos; but all too prone to be overdone in the wake of Freud’s, the Frankfurt school, notably Marcuse’s project of unleashing “eros’ in polymorphous perversion”; and finally, within the disorder of modernity, of which the Frankfurt school was instrumental – to transcend a liberalism that would flout and even prohibit our human ecological border and bounds control.
Text, Part 2
That we can also have a more liberal option along with a sacred option – both – has the added benefit of undercutting any appeal of our Abrahamic antagonists – Judaism, Christianity and Islam – undercutting their appeal for their conservative aspects and capitalizing on liberal rejection, rebellion and liberation from any of their draconian restrictiveness; and having both options on our side incentivizes loyalty. While border control will, in turn, incentivize loyalty, as the system demonstrates verifiable responsibility to our genetic capital.
On the other hand, the threat of ostracism for people who mix and bear offspring outside the race will disincentivize their behavior as it will be observed that people who do that will not be able to share in the leverage of our social support for themselves and their children; they will, in fact, be subject to live with consequences of the non-White way of life they’ve chosen. They certainly will not be entitled to impose the support of their Mulatto children upon us, making us defacto slaves in their treachery and forcing remaining White children to be born into a nightmare world – a planet of the apes scenario.
But how to further counter these hate infested Mulatto-supremacists?
How to incentivize group loyalty and the option of monogamy for puerile females in particular; given these powerful forces, both natural and Manichean, that result from the machinations of our antagonists?
Acknowledging that eggs are precious, gestation and child bearing a large burden, we might provide them with some additional advantages to going the monogamous route.
There are already some advantages, of course, to the White female position taking the monogamous option. It accords with our nature as K selectors for her to have a man for high investment parenting, there to help her in all aspects of life; which will be even more appealing to her if the man is both sufficiently fair in his appeal to her if not a hypergamous upgrade – I’m using hypergamous a bit wrongly here, I mean simply a man perhaps of a slightly higher standard – but also sufficiently realistic and appropriate a choice for him to want to remain monogamous and loyal to her.
Thus, part of sacrament, and its episodic testament to the aeons and this relationship beyond the episode and moment, would be a careful process of partner selection, in which they are further incentivized with the option of considering men their equal, say, one increment below or two above, for example, in terms of emotional, intellectual, physical and material standard.
While males, because sperm is cheap, will have the option of sacrament as well, but they will be penalized by having the capacity to consider women only one increment above, their equal or two numbers below.
The options will provide incentive to White males as their naturally more sublimated, K selection maturation process is protected both by the border control and by the institutionalization of monogamous sacrament – the pattern overall will provide them with a more sublime, less atavistic sort of White female partner and way of life.
There should also be increased social support for monogamous, child bearing couples.
Nevertheless, I anticipate that this specificatory model, that is to say, sketch of a measurement scale model – from 1 – 10, or 1 – 100, and using whatever qualities our scientists focus on – intellect, emotion, physical, whatever, will be seized upon by detractors as ‘bean counting’ as if I am quite literal minded about it, but this again is to misunderstand the place of a specificatory structure.
I can speak from experience of the (psychological) utility of this scale as a place holder at very least. That when I endured the humility of tautology, knowing that I was willing to be fair and take my equal on such scales, say 1 – 10, it helped to stop a horrible intentional oscillation caused by shrill and hateful females in my life who chronically and falsely alleged that I was a pig, wanting more or better in a partner or partners than I actually wanted and deserved for the fact that I admired beauty in women. So, the basic structure, for example a 1 – 10 scale, can help resolve feelings of guilt for being so, quote, superficial as to notice women’s beauty (or not), while evaluating her on other quote impure grounds as well.
If people want more options, want to try for better or more, then they can partake of the more free for all in the broader sphere of the ethnostate, what might be referred to as a celebrative disposition toward sex with the rest of our society – within its borders and bounds.
Text, Part 3
In fact, it should be observed that without these options, agency and authentic choice is vastly diminished.
However, the option of moving toward reverence of the pattern beyond moment and episode will increase alternative range of functional autonomy and relieve males of the pressure to assimilate brute alpha behavior…constrained as it were to rape and sexual harassment allegation territory, furthermore, beyond judgment merely on the basis of momentary and episodic competition, or frequency thereof, …and put them instead into a relational mode and stable cultural pattern level – where our best attributes are often revealed.
For our own people, the White class is required to ensconce the freedom of our full systemic, developmental processes and evolution – again, as Rushton has shown, we are distinguished by our age of maturation, sublimation and k selection as opposed to r selection – this needs protection from the quicker maturation and predation of r selectors
Thesis: Seminal and essential to instantiation of the White class, its systemic homeostasis, flexibility of ecological balance and accountability, is freedom of choice as maintained through a voluntary option, institutionalized of single sex partner for life hopefuls. It is ensconced in the notion of sex as sacrament: the sacrosanct reconstruction of an episode uniquely important to the survival of the cultural pattern.
Two key aspects that make sex as sacrament into a viable option are the fact that sex is sexy – that is to say, its mechanism. Another is the dimension of social control.
Let me first address its mechanism – sex is sexy. Its erotic mechanism is of two contrasts.
One contrast is that of human dignity (in patterns of relationship) contrasting with animal drive.
The other is a tension between human dignity as opposed to dominance and submission. (That is, providing that the roles are treated somewhat empathically; and that one role or the other is not taken too seriously).
This mechanism of tension that makes sex sexy in essence bodes for the possibility of sex as sacrament as opposed to a merely naturalistic argument that may dismiss sacrament as nonsense.
Sex as sacrament is naturally practical as it is not so contingent upon one’s being the most skilled or beautiful at all times. It is especially practical if class boundaries are enforced and/or a sacral attitude is socially normalized.
How practical the option of monogamy is in reality is far less important than it being recognized as important, sanctioned as a viable option – available, respected, institutionalized, normalized as vitally important – sex and monogamy as a sacrament. As opposed to ‘that’s the way it is, we’re all just animals out to screw anything’, the fact of reverence and existence of sacral practice will provide a morale booster, an antidote to cynicism, a pattern to be loyal to and to fight for as it is loyal to us in turn.
It is nonsense to dismiss as puritanical White Americans who are not free-loving and celebratory with their sex amidst Negroes and sundry non-Whites.
If you are not disposed to celebration at this point in time, especially not in the enforced roulette of such a demographically mixed situation, especially not with regard to something as important as sex, it is more than understandable.
Thus, for the purposes of re-establishing the sovereignty of our brute genus as Whites and the species of our nationalism, sex as celebration versus sex as a sacrament serves as a problematizing distinction; it serves particularly to emphasize a willing suspension of belief in the innocence of sex as celebration. As a conceptual foil, it will hopefully serve to illustrate how obnoxious and destructive the celebrations can be. As they are flaunted in the face of those who exercise care, mocking the sacredness of the group’s deep resource, it is our purpose thus to lend credence to sex as sacrament.
Sex is surely not merely a trivial matter of an episode. It concerns confirmation or disconfirmation of persons and their worth as socio-political decision makers. Even more fundamentally, it is the natural means by which people come into and populate the world in a responsible way or not; legacies set forth or not; at an appropriate age, or not; in reasonable numbers as resources, experience and wisdom afford, or not – and much more.
Text, Part 4
If we can care about the preservation of rain forests, the hills of West Virginia, endangered species and the gulf of Mexico, and we certainly do care, very much, then we are assuredly warranted by any credible moral standard, to care for our co-evolutionary people, our co-evolutionary women, children and the world they have no choice over coming into.
A pervasive ecological view, combining as it does the taxonomic system of class (as in the White race), acts as a corrective to Lockeatine empiricism – its Cartesian notion of individual rights being prone to rupture systemic, evolutionary process.
It also acts as a corrective to the toxicity of John Dewey’s instrumental pragmatism. That is of significance as Dewey was particularly resourceful with his instrumentalism, and with that, a large influence in promoting liberal democracy, despite his philosophy having serious flaws.
Despite its resource and influence his pragmatism de-emphasizes the significance of deep genetic and processual relationships. With instrumental, practical force being overstated, the prefigurative facts of historical, co-evolutionary processes in the development of maturation and skill recede from consideration. Being overly practical thus, it promotes a disposition of progressing ever forward, in search of “ever more full and rich experience.” As such, it devalues consideration of biological optimality – biological creatures do not need “more and more”, too much is toxic as is too little. Moreover, being quite so instrumental, it is not sufficiently respectful of natural processes and necessarily corresponding metaphors of reflection, gestation and digestion. It is not sufficiently respectful of ecological systems requirement for the flexibility of empty space and unused potentiality for change.
While the slow meandering of Heidegger’s philosophy makes it better in those regards, the ecological view acts as a corrective to his oversights as well – notably in regard to “own-most being toward death.” This too would be toxic, a good last alternative, but not a proper day-to-day premise for White survival, as nature rarely works within lethal variables. It should be bad enough that miscegenation is possible. Black-on-White murder or the extinction of Whites would not even approach appreciable consideration before compelling action on an ecological basis. Further, owmost being toward death also lends itself too much to promotion an overly individualistic bias, insufficiently socially conscientious, insufficiently accountable to our historical, social systemic capital.
That is why the idea of the voluntary option for sex as sacrament is necessary, along with our boundaries, as a control variable to govern the homeostasis of our social, biological, human ecological systems. ….to move beyond instrumentalism and the episodic concern of consciousness and the moment in owmost being toward death and into the ownmost innocence of our children in the hereafter, in service of delivering them from being born into a nightmare circumstance. We cannot do that to White kids, let them come into a nightmare world of hyper assertive, violent Africans, and Islamic tyranny and Jewish supremacism which disrespects our interests as goyim – the undifferentiated gentile mass, as GW observes, that they would conceive us to be.
Text, Part 5
Sex as Sacrament also corresponds to our Augustinian nature – evolved as we are to deal with Augustinian problems, that is to say natural challenges, to solve more straight forward problems of nature rather than to deal with the Manichean trickery of other, competing tribes and people….
Many of us to not want to play games, use tricks and deception to lure a partner perhaps inappropriate for us; in fact, we want an honest way to assess an appropriate match; and then to investigate the world with our partner in collaborative effort.
While Sacrament and Celebration are useful narratives in regard to sex, the truth is that there are many stories to tell about sex including scientistic ones; but the mechanism at the center does afford sacrament. Narrative reframing of sex will also help Whites to find their ownmost innocence – an antidote opposed to the YKW guilt trip of Jesus sermon on the mount wherein even if you think of something, you’ve done it. By contrast, moment of thought is like one frame in a movie reel, a cybernetic surveying mechanism of orientation on brute genetic competition, and whatever counter taboo you may require in momentary counter balance against, say, the factually hard to ignore high contrast tropism of interracial sex – whatever counter taboo you may need mentally, you didn’t do it and you are not necessarily recommending it. …you are merely thrown into a cybernetic balancing process of sexual mechanism, thrown between human dignity and submission to brute animal requirement, episodic dominance and submission, competition verses sublimation in broader pattern. Even males must have some empathy for submission to the brute requirement and the eroticism for example that a woman can find in submitting.
But apart from dealing with mechanism thus, another aspect of sex that enables the possibility of sacrament is that its practice can be relatively altered by social influence.
A social framework toward sex facilitates even greater rigor for the truth of the matter – again, the broader pattern – over scientistic treatment sheerly on the basis of moment and episode. It gives advantages as well. For example, if a sublime White woman gives herself to a black, we are more attentive with the social framework and the precipitating aspects whereof her decision was not made alone. The circumstance has been arranged for, encouraged, manipulated and allowed for; those who would voice objection that might resonate with her have been silenced by social injunction. This result is not a mere no account matter of science, nature, let alone religion.
By contrast, the scientistic view would hold that sex is a merely natural fact, biologically determined and therefore, socially incorrigible. The episode and moment of sexual union would be very tightly linked with mere biological imperatives. Who, after all, could question that? It is just a scientific fact. That’s just the way it is, natural law; has little to do with the mediation of the quality of life beyond that.
But if it is not merely determined that the women do this, if our behavior is not so determined, but rather to some extent negotiable of interactive patterns, a matter of conjoint social construction of the class, then it is corrigible, agentive and accountable – there is something that can be done about it, which is not to her detriment, especially as the way of life is deemed at least as valuable and important as the episode and the moment.
To paraphrase Basque philosopher Unomuno, we require a vision of perfection to strive for and then the vicissitudes of moment and episode will be like waves crashing harmlessly against the rocks girding our individual path and relational patterns.
As I came through my studies to understand how Post Modern philosophy was supposed to work in White interests – i.e., to sustain group systemic homeostasis despite the oblivious rough shod of modernist ideology and hostile or backward tradition (whether of one’s own people or in conflict with the ethnocentrism of other peoples), I just assumed that my correctives of the misrepresentations of Post Modernity would be welcomed by what appeared to be the generally intelligent people of older and younger generations concerned with afflictions against European peoples.
I would figure that the following statement, which I have been making for decades, and publicly for over a decade, would be greeted by floods of White Nationalists of every generation seeking to steel man and confirm it for the monumentally important statement in its significance to our interests that it is:
Anti-Racism is Cartesian; as such, it is not innocent, it is prejudice, it is prejudice against prejudice (it is Cartesian in its prejudice, i.e., against social classification, accountability and discrimination accordingly) and with that, it is hurting and it is killing people.
Arguments can be made against supremacist, exploitative and genocidal deployment of classification, but in the Jewish weaponized modernist form, to where any classification (at least as rendered by Whites) is to be prohibited as egregiously racist, it is a Cartesian absurdity. Telling people to not discriminate on the basis of group classification is almost like saying, “don’t have eyeballs” to see that wild animal… the horror of seeing that 1964 Civil Rights placard over entranceways in American public institutions… “discrimination on the basis of race, sex, religion” etc. is prohibited.
But it is worse than that, of course, as it is primarily weaponized against White people, Alinsky style, making us live up to ‘our; Cartesian rules.
In Ant- Racism, we are under attack as a group, effectively as the classification, “White people”, and we must defend ourselves as a group; they are going to treat us as a White group, attacking all of our members, not drawing distinctions between our nations, though some would try to say their European differences are overwhelmingly important and other Europeans are of underwhelming concern.
Thus, regarding classification, I must note that I use the term White to represent the genus classification European peoples, and I do this particularly as it is awkward to refer to diaspora as “European” since they are in other continents, citizens there, not in Europe. And I take this genus classification “White” as a necessary unit of defense, as anti-racism is a targeting of the full genus classification of Europeans, not only in Europe.
A warm reception and steel manning from White advocates was not what I’d get for this, and especially not for the explanations of Post Modern correctives to this Cartesian estrangement – notably, modalities of group (leftist) advocacy, including social constructionism and hermeneutic process in order to sustain group systemic homeostasis against Cartesian estrangement and the systemic runaway that it was thus susceptible to.
It seems no amount of explanation of how Post Modern philosophy proper is supposed to work in our interests – lets call it White post modernity to distinguish it form the hyper relative, ironic deconstructionist da da red-caping that they’ve grown accustomed to and want to believe is “post modernity” – no amount of corrective explanation could bring them around.
Now, the essence of the post modern project for European concerns is to re-centralize our world view through praxis – that is, to re-calibrate our world view through the relative interests of our group classification as opposed to objective Cartesian estrangement – which has been a byproduct of modernity, intoxicated overvaluation of its perspective for its success in the fields of science and technology. And there have also been these negative consequences of its (((weaponization))) in purity spirals and the misrepresentation (((red caping))) of post modern corrective so that people think that hermeneutics, social constructionism and so on is against science, truth, nature, etc. That is not true.
As I have expressed the case, objective science and truth inquiries are invaluable and should serve as feedback to be gauged against the calibration of our relative subjective and group interests (i.e., in accordance with the post modern corrective project); while scientism, i.e. bad science and bad application of science should obviously be subject to critique, gauged against our relative interests – what we Care most about.
Again, the philosophical critique of Cartesianism, its place in modernity’s scientistic abuse, is not to say that Cartesianism has no valid application; it does, as in the example of microwave engineering, which uses Cartesian coordinates. The philosophical concern, however, is to not get stuck there, overwrought with anxiety in Cartesian pursuit of some pure warrant and position while losing sight of relative concerns in Praxis. We want to use theory not be used by it.
I recently heard the ‘great genius’, Ecce Lux (complicit with Boomer right wingism, because he thinks he’s too smart, knows how to patch up that bullshit), in conversation with Jonathan Pohl (fat x-er Gemanophile with mixed Asian kids; but satisfied to trade in false currency popular with the U.S.’s predominant demographics), commending ‘our one glorious period.” He was referring to the Nazi epoch; displaying the fact that he did not see the great hazard of trying to warrant what should be your people’s cause instead in pure nature, natural fallacy, below the anchoring and correctivity of their Praxis.
He said (in a poor attempt to take a page from my book), “I’m always thinking about how we should align with nature.”…
Well, we should try to align and harmonize with nature, but not be so stupid as Semiogogue and try to make it the central world view as opposed to the anthropocentrism of praxis.
To be without the relative gauge, anchoring concern and centralizing correctivity of praxis, to use an absurd example, is like saying lets align ourselves with a meteor hurtling to earth like the one that killed the dinosaurs.
And just as Hitler was very appealing to puerile females, so too will this right wing bullshit be appealing to a number of puerile females in the fall-out of modernity, making it all the more dangerous; being pandered to in their base propensity to incite genetic competition; for whether right wing expression emerges in them as opposed to their liberal expression, they are still based on objectivism; and within the disorder, they are powerfully positioned to be gate keepers over the mode of correction; incentivized to let through liberal objectivsits (where things haven’t gotten bad enough for them personally)/or right wing objectivists (where things have gotten bad enough for them personally); but the same objective basis taken for granted in their gate keeping, whether liberal or right wing, to let into power liberals who will open boundaries or right wingers, who will attack them imperialistically; and as they come unhinged in the right wing side of the purity spiral of their natural fallacy, they will be happy to see the “dead wood” (i.e., “unnecessary” males to these sated females) cleared-out; they are not really on your side when unsocialized; they just know, rather, that they are going to breed with the winner.
Ecce lux is smart enough then, to function as an Xer who (tries to) patch up the defects in the conduit of right wing Boomer reaction and back again from the internet bubble that they’ve fed into among Millennial Nazi fans “Will2wr” and “Ovfuckyou”, who literally encouraged him to sympathizers with their Nazi fan position in antagonism to my platform which seeks to coordinate all European peoples.
It has been a long standing curiosity of mine, how people who can be so intelligent on one level (Ecce claims to be able to rapidly solve a Rubiks cube) can be so stupid on the most important levels. Ecce is also a Christian. This would be the other side of the Cartesian divide, beyond nature, Praxis and accountability thereof. Talk about taking accountability beyond Praxis – the Sermon on the Mount and your accountability is to Jesus. I suppose you can make arguments that when he says, “even if you think of” sinning, you’ve done it.. therefore you can’t keep the ten commandments in purity and so you have to make judgments in Praxis, but that’s awfully convoluted; that golden rule and sermon on the mount remains an awfully confusing “guide” for conduct in the reality of Praxis…
The Cartesian anxiety is certainly due in part to this Christian purity spiral to avoid the guilt trips laid on them by the sophists in Praxis.
Christianity is not just a Jewish trick. Though it is that, it is not just that. It is a profound hijacking of our moral order, the structuring of our most sacred concerns by which to govern ourselves. The red caping tends to either have us submit through fear – that has been, after all, “our moral order;” or it has us chasing the red cape, rejecting morals altogether as an invalid concern, believing in natural fallacy instead, whether Hitler, some Cartesian purity spiral beyond the relative concerns of our people, or whatever, instead of doing the work to wrest a suitable moral order for ourselves (as there is no rising above moral concern: there will always be some things you can do, some things you cannot do and some things that are optional).
Hard to imagine a more egregious imposition on a people than the red caping of our moral order.
But I digress..
As much as those who object to what is called “post modernity” are dismayed by “relativism”, what they are not appreciating is that the upshot of the objectivism of Cartesianism is hyper-relativism. That is because in the anxiety to establish pure warrant, the “that’s just the way it is, no need for further human account” than the principles within nature, below praxis (group interaction of relative interests) or the principles beyond nature and praxis, they are abrogating social accountability and the group systemic anchoring that it would otherwise establish.
The Cartesian anxiety, that would take this divide to one extreme or another, above or beyond nature, is largely a reaction to sophistry, abuses within praxis, which would abuse our relative and most cherished relational concerns; hence the preoccupation for pure warrant that will not be assailed by any rhetoric.
However, as the Cartesian reaction typically latches white knuckle to the empirical end, looking for things palpable to latch onto, viz., if the purpose is to establish the distinctness of individual and group identity and their warrant to maintain themselves as such, they are confronted with the arbitrariness of the empirical end, thrown back on what Heidegger calls the existential “thrownness.” In the case of human group identity, the empirical fact is that we can interbreed with any people on earth and therefore, there is at least a modicum of arbitrariness to the distinction of our personal and group identity.
It is true that they YKW exploit this fact to no end, and it does not have to be a great problem – i.e., the differences are still real, even if patterned – but it cannot and should not be denied, as there are problems with denying the truth of the matter and there are advantages in acknowledging it – coherence, accountability, agency, correctivity and warrant.
It will be noted that heremeneutics not only facilitates coherence, accountability, agency, warrant, group and pervasive ecology, but it also facilitates overcoming paradoxes, dilemmas, pernicious charmed and strange loops, confusing ambiguities, tangled relationships and more. It is absolutely imperative to a successful individual and group life and mind boggling that any of our people, let alone leading exponents would object (although there are apparent reasons, due to the misapprehension (red caping, which I will get to) by tenured liberal professors in conversation with undergraduates from 18 – 24 in perpetuity.
Hermeneutics is the distinctly human capacity, a non Cartesian capacity for language, narrative to open up time and history, space and systemic expanse, liberating us from the arbitrary facticity, flux and tangles of the moment and episode.
In fact, it was Heidegger’s student, Hans Georg Gadamer, author of “philosophical hermeneutics” who turned the brilliant post modern phrase against Modernity and its “Enlightenment”, calling it “the prejudice against prejudice.”
..without prejudice, in pure objectivity, of course we are subject to the arbitrary flux of the moment and episode; the pattern is unaccounted for.
From this (with honorable mention to another student of Heidegger, i.e., Arendt), I derive, “anti-racism is Cartesian, it is prejudice, it is not innocent, it is hurting and it is killing people.
And if one is looking for empirical grounds where they might find post modern classificatory bounds, Gadamer has an excellent suggestion of at least one check point in the case of “marginals” – they know where the shoe pinches, can be a kind of centurion, noting where systemic bounds might be breeched and have perspective to provide valuable feedback on the system, necessary accountability and correctivity thereof.
You want an empirical basis for group bounds? Marginals, i.e., those just within our system but pushed toward the edge, are a great place to look. Furthermore, everyone is a marginal from time, if only because they are “better” than others…
But what has happened with our tenured liberal professors pandering to 18 to 24 year old undergraduates in perpetuity?
In their Cultural Marxism, they have red caped the concept, to were “marginals” are presented not as those precariously just within the system, but rather those from without, who should liberally be let into the classification to no end (or rather to end White people).
The concept has been red caped. But with its proper understanding, this engagement of inquiry as process, will allow us to deal with our problems, gracefully move from vast imagination, the suspension of disbelief necessary to manage a working hypothesis, to the most critical and rigorous verification, down to operational verifiability and warranted assertability.
It is is a small price to pay for the agency that we wrest by acknowledging the modicum of arbitrariness of our interactive relation; and to keep our people, especially our people (with our penchant for objectivism and individual detachment to lose sight of our social relations and indebtedness), to be sensitized to the post modern significance of centralizing our world view through our relative group interests (praxis); we are thus advised to engage in the social constructionist program proper, and that’s understood as a necessary corrective, right? For in its proper form, like hermeneutics, it has an anti Cartesian mandate which facilitates coherence, accountability, agency and warrant.
At least a modicum of agency is always recognized through social constructionism by one of four means:
While Social Constructionism’s red caped misrepresentation is taken for granted by right wingers, “race is just an optical illusion” and “I can make of myself whatever new gender that I like”…
This ANTI-SOCIAL, solipsistic misrepresentation of social constructionism obfuscates its true purpose, which is to foster social accountability, correctivity and agency:
Social constructionism proper, maintains that there are four aspects of social construction, always entailing at least a modicum of agency:
1. The more literal: as in constructing a building together.
2. The metaphoric: as in parents “constructing” a child, with the help of some sort of input from any number of people around them at present and historically…
3. The hermeneutic: to manage the non-Cartesian process of inquiry between rigor and imagination as need be to facilitate systemic maintenance (individual and group). Hermeneutics is necessary for the liberation from modernity’s mere facticity and the arbitrary moment and episode into coherence and accountability for both individual and group to follow the historical expanse and temporal systemic breadth of our people.
4. The post hoc attribution as to how facts count:
That guy may think he’s a woman, but he has a weenie and a Y chromosome, that’s a fact and for us as sane people, that means that he cannot use the ladies room.
…….
Trumpets, Red Carpet, Nobel Prize, a Million Dollars, White Nationalists cheering in legion, right? Wrong.
To begin in a word, you can call “anti-racism”, the prohibition of classification and discrimination accordingly, (((weaponized))) modernity. While concepts of Post Modern correction have been (((weaponized))) to misdirect Whites against systemic homeostasis.
I will thus need to venture further elaboration of reasons as to why even White advocates have been kept in positions of antagonism to these ideas, in order to overcome this misdirection.
….no matter how justified, innocuous, potentially salutary, or inane and hapless are presented as egregious. While black riots, no matter how unjustified and destructive, presented as righteous.
1/11/2021
With all the ballyhoo about the “breach” of the U.S. Capitol building by Trump supporters in disbelief over the vote count, we might note that in the course of the buffoonishly hapless photo- op occupy / sit-in protest of the Capitol building, an unarmed White woman, Ashli Babbitt, was shot dead by a black policeman even though she was surrounded by police and could have done them no harm. Nothing will be said about her while the black guy, George Floyd, who died while under arrest by a White policeman in Minneapolis was world wide news and cause for violence in cities throughout the White world.
Update 1/12
Japanese journalist Masako Ganaha analyses videos from the break-in of the Capitol Building on January 6th, when Ashli Babbitt was murdered, and this is what she discovered:
Furthermore, recall the knee that Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer et al took the knee in deference for “Black Lives Matter” while they rioted, destroying vast swathes of downtown cities across America (creating cheap real estate opportunities for oligarchs) burning private businesses and state buildings, assaulting and murdering… the continued assault on White systemic homeostasis, viz. an attack not only by riot but which includes Covid business shut downs, effectively destroying the White middle class and upwardly mobile, who might challenge their enemies and elitist traitors.
Remember the smile on Kamala Harris face as she said that BLM should keep it up, keep rioting! …see the “age restricted” video just a few stories below.
Remember who is in the leadership of Black Lives Matter:
In 1983, Susan Rosenberg planted a bomb outside the US Senate chamber to assassinate Republican senators. House Judiciary Committee Chairman
got Pres. Clinton to pardon Susan Rosenberg.
She’s now a board member of Black Lives Matter Network, Inc.
So, now we’ve got a politically correct senile old man as President; and while this Biden tries to move along in his precarious condition. waiting in the wings as VP, a mixed-race woman who delights in the destruction of White Americans.
Kamala Harris:
“The BLM ‘protesters’ “are not going to stop, everyone beware! and they should not let up!”
Clip of Kamala Harris speaking to Stephen Colbert in June is going viral again, as the party attempts to pivot away from their support of the violent riots.
Stephen Colbert: I want to be clear that I know that there are still “protests” that are happening in major cities across The United States…
Kamala Harris (smiles enthusiastically) Yeah!
Colbert: …we’re just not seeing the reporting on it… that I had for the first few weeks.
Kamala Harris: Right, that’s right… but they’re not going to stop! They’re not going to stop! This is a movement I’m telling you! They’re not going to stop. And everyone beware! Because they’re not going to stop… it is gonna … they’re not gonna stop before election day in November and they’re not going to stop after election day. And that should be, everyone should take note of that, on both levels. That this isn’t, they’re not going to let up, and they should not, and we should not!
Retired NYPD Commissioner Bernard Kerik warns public Black Lives Matter fundraising is ran by a terrorist
SAN DIEGO (KUSI) – As the protest for social justice continue across the United States, some are critical of the true intentions of the “Black Lives Matter” movement.
Retired NYPD Commissioner Bernard Kerik discussed the danger of Revolutionary Marxists leading the Black Lives Matter group with KUSI’s Ginger Jeffries.
To many, the protests seem to have turned into a extremely radical political movement rather than a movement for social justice police brutality. The group has grown immensely in popularity and strength since the unfortunate death of George Floyd in Minneapolis. The protests have not stopped, but critics of the movements believe many, if not most, of the people supporting “Black Lives Matter” don’t embrace the true political intentions of the movement.
The “Black Lives Matter” movement is partnered with the nonprofit group, Thousand Currents. This is important because the Vice Chair of the Thousand Currents nonprofit, is Susan Rosenberg.
Susan Rosenberg is a convicted terrorist. In 1985, Rosenberg was convicted for possessing hundreds of pounds of explosives. She and her organizations involved in multiple robberies, police officer assassinations, and bombings.
Rosenberg was sentenced to 58 years in prison. She spent 16-years in federal prison before being pardoned by Bill Clinton on his last day in office.
Now, Rosenberg is leading the fundraising efforts for Black Lives Matter.
In 1985, retired NYPD Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik personally escorted Rosenberg (photo below) out of the Newark courthouse in 1985. From being personally connected to Rosenberg during her court appearances, Kerik is warning Americans of the dangers of Black Lives Matter and that Susan Rosenberg is one of their “fundraising gurus.”
Kerik is very concerned about the dangers of Rosenberg, and believes under her lead, the “revolutionary marxist” Black Lives Matter group wants to overthrow the country.
Kerik tells KUSI News that, “Rosenberg’s role in the ‘Family,’ as this confederation of white and black domestic terrorists called themselves, was to use her “white privilege” to do such things as acquire weapons, purchase vehicles, and rent apartments for safe houses and storage units for explosives and weapons.”
He continued to explain, “in 1981, she allegedly drove a getaway car in the Brink’s armored car holdup in Rockland County, N.Y., in which two policemen and a guard were murdered. Authorities nabbed her in 1984 when she and Timothy Blunk were caught in New Jersey unloading the following from a U-Haul truck to a storage unit: 640 pounds of stolen explosives, an arsenal of weapons, manuals on terrorism, and false IDs.”
A Convicted Terrorist Sits On Board Of Charity Handling Black Lives Matter Fundraising
Thousand Currents, the California-based charity that manages fundraising operations for the national arm of Black Lives Matter, includes on its board a convicted terrorist whose sentence was commuted by former President Bill Clinton on his last day in office.
Susan Rosenberg was identified as the vice chair of the Thousand Currents board of directors on the charity’s website until Wednesday when the page was taken down after the conservative think tank Capital Research Center detailed her involvement with a communist terrorist group that had carried out bombings in New York and Washington, D.C., in the early 1980s.
Rosenberg’s involvement with the May 19 Communist Organization, which carried out its bombing campaign to create a contrast to former President Ronald Reagan’s “Morning in America” campaign promise, earned her a spot on the FBI’s Most Wanted List, according to The Washington Examiner. She was arrested in New Jersey in 1984 while unloading 740 pounds of stolen explosives and a sub-machine gun from a truck.
Rosenberg was released from prison in 2001 after having her sentence commuted by Clinton, serving 16 years of her 58-year prison sentence.
U.S. Attorney Mary Jo White lobbied aggressively against Rosenberg’s commutation at the time, noting that she had allegedly been one of the getaway drivers in the 1981 Brink’s robbery, which resulted in the deaths of two police officers and one security guard. Rosenberg was charged with crimes in the robbery, but those charges were dropped because she was already in prison, The New York Times reported.
Rosenberg was also identified as a member of the Thousand Currents board of directors in the charity’s Form 990s submitted to the IRS for its 2016, 2017 and 2018 fiscal years, indicating that the former terrorist has been involved with the group for the entirety of its fiscal sponsorship arrangement with Black Lives Matter Global Foundation, which began in 2016.
Financial statements prepared by Thousand Currents reveal that 83.3% of BLM Global Foundation’s total spending during its 2017, 2018 and 2019 fiscal years was spent on travel, consulting and payroll, while only about 6% was put toward grants to outside organizations such as the local BLM chapters, the Daily Caller News Foundation previously reported.
BLM Global Network Managing Director Kailee Scales told the DCNF the figures “do not reflect, for example, the in kind support for chapters and fundraising directed to chapters and programmatic assistance to chapters, that would not show up as direct grants on the audited financials.”
In addition to removing the page on its website disclosing Rosenberg as a member of its board of directors, Thousand Currents also took down a page that had disclosed financial information for the charity such as audits and Form 990s dating back to 2005.
Thousand Currents did not return the DCNF’s request for comment.
BLM Global Network has raised a substantial sum of money since the death of George Floyd, an unarmed black man who died on May 25 in Minneapolis police custody.
In recent weeks the group has announced grant funds totaling $12.5 million after raising more than $1.1 million in donations since Floyd’s death. The average donation to BLM Global Network clocked in at $33, The Associated Press reported.
Over 600 Jewish groups express solidarity with “Black Lives Matter” in full page NY Times ad.
‘Black Lives Matter,’ declare groups representing majority of US Jews in NYT ad.
Over 600 Jewish organizations sign letter, published on anniversary of March on Washington, backing ‘current day Civil Rights Movement’
An ad taken out in the New York Times by over 600 Jewish organizations in support of the Black Lives Matter movement. (Courtesy)
NEW YORK — Over 600 Jewish organizations, representing the majority of American Jews, signed a letter in support of the Black Lives Matter movement that was published in a full-page New York Times ad on Friday.
“We support the Black-led movement in this country that is calling for accountability and transparency from the government and law enforcement. We know that freedom and safety for any of us depends on the freedom and safety of all of us,” reads the letter, which was published on page A17 of the print edition of The New York Times.
“As Jews, we know how dangerous this is: when politicians target Jewish people and blame us for problems, it leads directly to violence against us. When Black movements are undermined, it leads to more violence against Black people, including Black Jews,” the letter says.
The 627 groups that signed the letter included the Reform, Conservative and Reconstructionist denominational movements, which make up 35 percent, 18% and 1% of American Jewry, respectively, according to a 2013 Pew Research Center study.
The list also includes several Orthodox groups such as the Uri L’Tzedek social justice organization and Yaffed, an advocacy group that seeks to improve secular education in Hasidic schools.
The letter’s signatories include ardently Zionist, mainstream organizations such as the Anti-Defamation League and Jewish Federations of North America local chapters, along with several groups that support the Boycott Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) Movement, including Jewish Voice for Peace and Anti-Zionist Shabbat.
A group of Jewish activists penned the letter and first posted it on the publishing platform Medium on June 25, against the backdrop of nationwide protests that erupted following the police killing of George Floyd in late May.
It garnered the backing of over 400 organizations within its first 48 hours, according to Audrey Sasson, the executive director of Jews for Racial and Economic Justice.
“We were starting to see the far-right concoct conspiracy theories that Black Lives Matter was being manipulated by Globalists and Marxists in an anti-Semitic attempt to undermine the Black-led movement,” Sasson said. “This brought an opportunity to unequivocally state as a large swath of Jewish community organizations that we stand behind Black Lives Matter and that any attempt to divide that movement will not land.”
A decision was made to re-publish the missive as a New York Times ad on Friday to mark the 57th anniversary of the March on Washington, the 1963 mass-rally for the civil and economic rights of Black Americans.
Organizers were careful to assert that no single organization had been behind the letter and that a diverse group of activists had been involved in writing it up.
“When we put it out, we said there would be no edits,” said Dove Kent, the senior strategy adviser at Bend the Arc: Jewish Action. Her progressive, political action group had been involved in the early logistics of the effort.
“I was shocked that we didn’t get one edit request from an institution. It showed how committed people in this moment are to supporting Black liberation,” Kent said.
Asked whether organizers faced any hurdles getting traditionally Zionist organizations to back a movement with some anti-Israel leanings in its past, Kent simply responded, “no.”
“What the response to this letter has shown is that people are not succumbing to the politics of division… We’re seeing the need to join together, even when we’re in disagreement on core issues,” she added.
Kent went on to assert that the latest effort by the coalition of Jewish organizations does not stop with the letter, and that many of them have been following it up with actions at the local level in support of police reform, hiring equity and affordable housing.
6 Sept 2020, TeamCandaceOwens:
The Full List – Here Are The 269 Companies Who Are Supporting BLM & Antifa
The full list is below and it includes at least one statement per company:
23andme: https://archive.is/Mjbwk
72andSunny: https://archive.is/B1x7Y
AbbVie: https://archive.is/Q2Vqj
Abbey Road Studios: https://archive.is/AJlrg
The Academy (the Oscars): https://archive.is/cNRYf
Activision Blizzard: https://archive.is/qfRJ1
Adidas: https://archive.is/ezQ22
Airbnb: https://archive.is/GmMjl
Alaska Airlines: https://archive.is/wnICf
Amazon: https://archive.is/lBR4u
American Airlines: https://archive.is/XBwhw
American Express: https://archive.is/kzWXa
American Apparel: https://archive.is/ETfYw
Apple Music: https://archive.is/cj97E
Ancestry: https://archive.is/5Q9JW
Armani: https://archive.is/hX6Yw
Astro Gaming: https://archive.is/9aWhf
AT&T: https://archive.is/OzC04
Atlantic Records: https://archive.is/65QQq
Barclays Bank: https://archive.is/9EAl4
Barnes & Noble: https://archive.is/PCPKn
Bandcamp: https://archive.is/5QQBT
Bank of America: https://archive.is/FH1O0
Bayer: https://archive.is/iT3EG
Bergdorf Goodman: https://archive.is/nQiPA
Bethesda: https://archive.is/2xeNE
Ben & Jerry’s: https://archive.is/BqHRv
Billboard: https://archive.is/Ruuv8
Booking.com: https://archive.is/CZAs7
Boost Mobile: https://archive.is/pLnAf
Bratz: https://archive.is/vOA1d
Burger King: https://archive.is/U9VzB
Bungie: https://archive.is/81KHV
Burberry: https://archive.is/ha0jP
Burt’s Bees: https://archive.is/4NbLi
Cadillac: https://archive.is/bS60C
Call of Duty: https://archive.is/DEJA6
Capcom: https://archive.is/S1BgN
Capitol Records: https://archive.is/jeUpY
Canada Goose: https://archive.is/y2nLo
Cartoon Network: https://archive.is/CxAd7
Chick-fil-A: https://archive.is/yiviH
Chipotle: https://archive.is/Rk9zI
Cisco: https://archive.is/fNvdP
Citigroup: https://archive.is/36fkF
Coca Cola: https://archive.is/bzTHi
Colourpop Cosmetics: https://archive.is/AapIR
Conde Nast: https://archive.is/ChMdI
Converse: https://archive.is//sKjmg
CORSAIR: https://archive.is/5S5DY
Creative Commons: https://archive.is/kPdCO
Criterion Collection: https://archive.is/JZ2Sd
Crunchyroll: https://archive.is/q7Ucj
DHL Express: https://archive.is/r4Pmp
Dell: https://archive.is/IeI9j
Degree: https://archive.is/SItaW
Devolver Digital: https://archive.is/xcaEH
DIRECTV: https://archive.is/hhBG4
Discord: https://archive.is/hGtDw
Disney: https://archive.is/wldfM
Doritos: https://archive.is/nLHv0
DoorDash: https://archive.is/vhTW2
Doulingo: https://archive.is/v9Wpk
Dribbble: https://archive.is/TDWFY
Dropbox: https://archive.is/O2ygm
E! News: https://archive.is/3PJyz
Eaton: https://archive.is/ezfyE
eBay: https://archive.is/TYTIz
Eight Sleep: https://archive.is/IiV7n
ESPN: https://archive.is/1I5Tf
Etsy: https://archive.is/FtTof
FedEx: https://archive.is/kKVJp
Fender: https://archive.is/OGjBM
Figma: https://archive.is/hNpcE
FILA: https://archive.is/d6bZ6
Fitbit: https://archive.is/Smx2g
Foot Locker: https://archive.is/XRL65
Formula 1: https://archive.is/FCpBG
Frosted Mini Wheats: https://archive.is/vrEYN
Funimation: https://archive.is/sfN8E
GameSpot: https://archive.is/zEkO3
Gartner: https://archive.is/QC8tz
Gatorade: https://archive.is/fo7wl
Genentech: https://archive.is/phHtt
General Motors: https://archive.is/IP0a6
Gibson: https://archive.is/qJYZY
Glossier: https://archive.is/IYlXB
GoDaddy: https://archive.is/VEMk4
Goldman Sachs: https://archive.is/TA2h0
GoFundMe: https://archive.is/Be0fJ
Google: https://archive.is/DK2T8
GoPro: https://archive.is/Aakvo
Gorilla Glue: https://archive.is/0R9ya
Grammarly: https://archive.is/Su1PT
Grindr: https://archive.is/Z6KcW
Guerilla Collective: https://archive.is/TTchM
Gumroad: https://archive.is/oZMr7
Gushers: https://archive.is/3Dju7
Habitat for Humanity: https://archive.is/B81pI
Harry’s: https://archive.is/mE4NN
HBO Max: https://archive.is/LGsPt
Headup: https://archive.is/G8ygg
Help Scout: https://archive.is//D8DCs
Hershey’s: https://archive.is/ZQ5zD
Home Depot: https://archive.is/KjUtA
Honda: https://archive.is/4UYtd
Hulu: https://archive.is/4CyO2
Humana: https://archive.is/RMRmE
Humble Bundle: https://archive.is/YXDb6
HyperX: https://archive.is/ZfHYp
IKEA: https://archive.is/piwcs
IMAX: https://archive.is/OiCj1
Indiegogo: https://archive.is/jrDZk
itch.io: https://archive.is/UTsTi
Intel: https://archive.is/93D5q
Invision: https://archive.is/UZkK1
Kickstarter: https://archive.is/0zwng
Lacoste: https://archive.is/T7nwc
Lego: https://archive.is/UKFhD
Levi’s: https://archive.is/KizLO
Lenovo: https://archive.is/aRuDu
Lexus: https://archive.is/71b2c
LinkedIn: https://archive.is/sX5zb
L’Oreal Paris: https://archive.is/Jfelo
Logitech: https://archive.is/vf6J7
Lowe’s: https://archive.is/V5UFz
Lucky Brand: https://archive.is/fY2Mw
Lululemon: https://archive.is/rjCRV
Louis Vuitton: https://archive.is/nGZe8
Lyft: https://archive.is/UXl3k
Madden NFL 20: https://archive.is/CTUoi
Marvel Entertainment: https://archive.is/Ptup6
Mastercard: https://archive.is/K0n1d
MATTEL: https://archive.is/bvsqN
McAfee: https://archive.is/IGXA1
McDonald’s: https://archive.is/jOZ65
Merck: https://archive.is/Uq30E
Mercedes Benz: https://archive.is/bs8y6
Met Life: https://archive.is/Dukhi
Metropolitan Opera: https://archive.fo/wecQ2
Microsoft: https://archive.is/A7Vjv
Mozilla: https://archive.is/m1aLg
Napster: https://archive.is/fVY1s
NASCAR: https://archive.is/LG2hU
Ncsoft: https://archive.is/OVPVP
Netflix: https://archive.is/UVSEr
New Balance: https://archive.is/NyGnG
New York Life: https://archive.is/HVVVk
Niantic: https://archive.is/UdKYR
Nickelodeon: https://archive.is/JWSPQ
[removed]: https://archive.is/UXYBy
Nintendo: https://archive.is/5UOjp
Nordstrom: https://archive.is/A7mUU
North Face: https://archive.is/rq1Cb
Old Spice: https://archive.is/1UK5d
OnlyFans: https://archive.is/EFs5C
Paramount Pictures: https://archive.is/ixXHd
Paramount Network: https://archive.is/BCAX3
Patreon: https://archive.is/wzfM5
Peloton: https://archive.is/d36k7
Pepsi Co: https://archive.is/9S5ow
Pfizer Inc: https://archive.is/A6hby
Playstation: https://archive.is/52Vvl
Plex: https://archive.is/9szCf
Pokemon: https://archive.is/p9zuP
Popeye’s Chicken: https://archive.is/CzlHd
Pop-Tarts: https://archive.is/8cMGG
Pornhub: https://archive.is/nciUB
Porsche: https://archive.is/VrmlZ
Pringles: https://archive.is/1WpA1
Procter & Gamble: https://archive.is/JSMO4
Puget Systems: https://archive.is/4Zcu7
PUMA: https://archive.is/lHx9j
Pusheen: https://archive.is/71dL1
Qualcomm: https://archive.is/syYmb
Quicken Loans: https://archive.is/SmDfJ
Reddit: https://archive.is/H09M8
RedHat: https://archive.is/ObTZu
Red Lobster: https://archive.is/aIUyy
Red Wing: https://archive.is/LLCVv
Reebok: https://archive.is/v0nat
Reese’s: https://archive.is/Rc4pJ
Rice Krispies: https://archive.is/U4Zn9
Riot Games: https://archive.is/2XH97
Rockstar Games: https://archive.is/QdcPI
Salesforce: https://archive.is/t1qZB
Sanofi: https://archive.is//ErmGO
Scholastic: https://archive.is/fFmX3
Sega: https://archive.is/9YyUJ
Sesame Street: https://archive.is/5he9K
Society Generale US: https://archive.is/IoUgp
Showtime: https://archive.is/YTPVw
Sketch: https://archive.is/QvXDT
Slack: https://archive.is/gF9ym
Sephora: https://archive.is/Gm7Rc
Shopify: https://archive.is/iq5jB
Skillshare: https://archive.is/JX5em
Snap: https://archive.is/HcGGQ
Snapchat: https://archive.is/5reL4
Sony: https://archive.is/1PtlU
Soundcloud: https://archive.is/H3ZDC
Spotify: https://archive.is/ufTeo
Square Enix: https://archive.is/qmPIX
STARZ: https://archive.is/eQ4YG
Starbucks: https://archive.is/EENlS
Star Wars: https://archive.is/xnSgt
Subway: https://archive.is/D5F8H
Supreme New York: https://archive.is/KqeQs
Sysco Corporation: https://archive.is/WyXx8
Taco Bell: https://archive.is/LLY9l
Target: https://archive.is/YoIrO
Tesco: https://archive.is/hZS7B
Thatgamecompany: https://archive.is/7po1C
Ticketmaster: https://archive.is/VkhNC
TikTok: https://archive.is/bt2vy
Timberland: https://archive.is/HZtxv
Tinder: https://archive.is/YaY2y
TMobile: https://archive.is//KB2lG
Tumblr: https://archive.is/i9fMQ
Twitch: https://archive.is/DAmR5
Twitter: https://archive.is/auIgi
Uber: https://archive.is/RrScn
Uber Eats: https://archive.is/UwwQS
Ubisoft: https://archive.is/0qMff
[removed]: https://archive.is/YZuWv
Ulta Beauty: https://archive.is/6ZESx
Under Armor: https://archive.is/WuYMM
UnitedHealth Group: https://archive.is/rzQXF
Vanguard: https://archive.is/Y12IM
Vans: https://archive.is/5nYag
VeggieTales: https://archive.is/ocjzA
Verizon: https://archive.is/hPZoJ
VERSACE: https://archive.is/wWsxK
Vevo: https://archive.is/MVtrR
ViacomCBS: https://archive.is/uCGXy
Virgin Records: https://archive.is/QiykN
Virta: https://archive.is/7e9KT
Vivaldi: https://archive.is/QO9do
Warner Bros https://archive.is/F1Tqn
Warner Records: https://archive.is/Mm6qb
Well’s Fargo: https://archive.is/CGA4n
Wendy’s: https://archive.is/7X4Nu
WeWork: https://archive.is/TEpa7
XBox: https://archive.is/6zdVS
Yamaha Music USA: https://archive.is/ANDkF
Yelp: https://archive.is/eU4NS
YouTube: https://archive.is/5qz6a
Zara: https://archive.is/t2QeR
Zildijian: https://archive.fo/o6Tqi
Zoom: https://archive.is/7o03X
…….
Related:
10 July 2020
Let out of jail by Clinton, Marxist terrorist Susan Rosenberg sits on board of Black Lives Matter.
https://majorityrights.com/weblog/news_comments/let_out_of_jail_by_clinton_marxist_terrorist_susan_rosenberg_sits_on_board
Related:
29 Nov 2020
Related:
7 Dec 2020
Restauranteur Angela Marsden’s restaurant business is going down along with all her staff dependent upon it for jobs, despite her compliance with all regulations, this being due to Covid-19 lock downs…and while this is happening, she discovers to her ultimate dismay that Hollywood is opening an identical restaurant facility to hers, right next door. It is a perfect example of how the monied elites are using Covid as an opportunity to squeeze out competition? from the middle and upwardly aspiring (mostly White) classes of America.
…..
Our football coaches were not Marxists imposing integration with blacks.
Rather, they were objectivists imposing integration with blacks.
Consider “the great football coach”, Vince Lombardi, and his indignation with regard to “racism.”
Vince Lombardi was neither regular Marxist nor a “cultural Marxist.”
In 1960, on at least one team, a color barrier still existed in the NFL. But Jack Vainisi, the Scouting Director for the Packers, and Lombardi were determined “to ignore the prejudices then prevalent in most NFL front offices in their search for the most talented players.” Lombardi explained his views by saying that he “… viewed his players as neither black nor white, but Packer green”. Among professional football head coaches, Lombardi’s view on discrimination was not de rigueur in the midst of the American civil rights movement.
An interracial relationship between one of the Packer rookies and a young woman was brought to the attention of Lombardi by Packer veterans in his first training camp in Green Bay. The next day at training camp, Lombardi, who had a zero tolerance policy towards racism, responded by warning his team that if any player exhibited prejudice, in any manner, then that player would be thrown off the team. Lombardi, who was vehemently opposed to Jim Crow discrimination, let it be known to all Green Bay establishments that if they did not accommodate his black players equally as well as his white players, then that business would be off-limits to the entire team. Before the start of the 1960 season, he instituted a policy that the Packers would only lodge in places that accepted all of his players.
Forward 1986:
.. woman claims Lofton forced her into the stairwell next to the elevator at ground level and forced her to perform a sex act – L.A. Times
The same objectivist paradigm that flouts “equality” may insist on integration of “the best” on objective grounds.
Perhaps because I was never immersed in Marxist/Leftist literature, but rather was repulsed by radicals, their advocacy of non-Whites in particular, repulsed enough to be averse to embracing even their better critiques, I never saw “equality” as an issue one way or another.
But even though it may have had something to do with not circulating among Marxists or immersing in their literature, I never really heard many “leftists” or anybody, for that matter, talking about wanting “equality.”
It has been rightists who have been overusing opposition of this term, adopting this paradigm and its blueprint for disaster – setting matters into false comparison and necessary conflict/dominance-subordination, whereas our concern for separatism is to be negotiated* in qualitative terms of differences that make a difference (qualitative non-sameness, paradigmatic incommensurability as opposed to inequality).
*“Negotiation” more in the sense of ‘negotiating an obstacle’ than in trying to reason with people, though we will do that too where our interests are yet to be violated.
Coming back to “the point of the day”, objectivism and its most pointed corollary of turning issues into quantitative comparisons – equality/inequality – is what our football coaches were going by – not cultural Marxism – when they considered it unthinkable that blacks should be kept off the football team and eventually, that the cheerleaders should not cheer them on…and couple with them:
Interracial marriage proposal flaunted at 2012 Super Bowl half-time
Runaway objectivism, its “rational” blindness flouting “equality,” is a load of race mixing poison that our right wing brings to the equation. This part of the blame derives disproportionately from a susceptibility of our ranks, not only or even mostly from Jews, though they have exploited it from the days of Christianity through the Enlightenment’s prejudice against prejudice, to “civil rights” and anti-racism.
….
What inspired this post was a realization that came about from a cursory glance at my high school football team’s history.
I might have supposed that Montclair Highschool’s “legendary coaches” Clary Anderson and Butch Fortunato…
…were merely rolling with the tides of civil rights and cultural Marxism. This was, after all, mere high school football. What precedence could it have over the Jewish media’s hallowed black sports figures who smashed open borders? Saint Jackie Robinson only entered into professional baseball in 1947. More broadly, Jewish Marxism’s gate opening legislation over public issues of so called “Civil Rights” (1964) and non-White immigration (1965) did not occur until a little after I was born – but on time to blame “the sixties” and consumers of rock music for opening the flood gates and unleashing a tidal wave of savage brown masses on Whites.
Those tough prior generations were from such innocent, straight shooting times, times of real men like Clary and Butch, who’d never take crap from blacks or marginal freaks.
Clary Anderson surely presided over pure White teams, his unbeaten Montclair aggregates (of 1946, ‘47) had integrity, unsullied by the fawning enlistment of fast twitching muscle fiber – Negroes who did not know their place was to twitch elsewhere.
Indeed, Buzz Aldrin, second man on the moon, was our center in 1946. That’s wholesome White American spirit and quest.
Buzz Aldrin, Montclair class of ‘47, Apollo 11, first moon landing, second man on moon.
But of 11 starters integral to the Montclair football team in that fall of 1946 campaign there were already four or five blacks – looking every bit as confident and menacing among them as the blacks on our class of ‘79 squad – by when the team was half black.
So what is going on here? I thought all the problems started with me?
I looked back to the teams of the very early 60’s, just before I was born and they already had a large percentage of the supremely confident ones. Even going into the 50’s…
On Clary’s early 50’s (viz., ‘50 – ‘52) squads there was “the great” Aubrey Lewis, named in 1999, “New Jersey’s offensive player of the century” by the Newark Star Ledger (in addition, he went on to be one of the first blacks recruited into the F.B.I.).
My eyes glazing-over when I heard coaches and others describe him as “great.” (I’ll skip the tawdry story of his son who had “dated” my friend’s first girlfriend prior to him).
… into the 40’s, as we’d mention with Aldrin’s class, but other classes from the 40’s as well…well into the 30’s, in 1930 in fact, there were blacks on the team. You pretty much have to go back to the 1920’s, when Clary himself was playing, to see consistently all-White teams (though even on the ‘28 and ‘29 teams there were one or two).
This is an important realization among other reasons, because the generations which set these changes in motion had a better sense of why this was happening. Again, it was not Marxism in any direct way that influenced who Clary Anderson took onto the team. Subsequent generations were simply overwhelmed.
…and Montclair is a mostly middle class White town, with some extremely affluent neighborhoods, featuring lavish estates:
Harrowing black throngs from adjacent East Orange and Newark seep into Montclair’s mainstream..have been, well before the 1960’s and Frankfurt school hegemony.
In a word, the cooperative and anti-war sentiments of those Whites who grew up in the sixties are too heavily blamed in WN discussions. The pugnaciousness and win-at-any-cost objectivism of prior White generations deserve far more blame than they get.
…
Caveat: Although Vince Lombardi was not a Marxist, his objectivist purity spiral was at least partly backed by his strong Christian convictions; i.e. the Jewish influence to blend away Gentile capacity for relative group organization and resistance to subjugation is still there.
Millennials may not be aware of this because they believe that they’ve been witnessing a breakthrough in their interests, and the right wing Boomers have their casual take on the red caping of left wing social organization confirmed, making them feel like experts as they color in the coloring book handed them by a YKW marketing campaign to help to create instant “experts” among the Millennials.
However, as reaction to (((Neo-Con))) wars for Israel (“Operation Clean Break” sought to use American military to effect regime change in the nations around Israel to make them Israel friendly – removing Iraq’s Saddam Hussein was Israel’s first concern) began to gather logical force along with reaction to reactions to the absurdity of Political Correctness, particularly where it intersected with the interests of the PTB, i.e.., in large part the YKW, damage control and a resurrection of the (((Paleocon))) end of controlled opposition became necessary for the YKW.
Former Left-Wing radical, David Horowitz, had his personal reasons along with the general intersectionality against his people, to do damage control and turned-in an excellent expose to William Lind, describing “Cultural Marxism”, the origin of PC in the Frankfurt School, which, observing that the White American working and middle class were too comfortable to wage Marxist class revolution, changed the advocacy of revolutionaries from working class to non-White or anti-White groups and coalitions thereof against Whites as a classification.
But particularly with the 2008 subprime mortgage meltdown the greater than ever YKW hegemony in 7-9 niches came exposed to intersectional criticism and Paul Gottfried in particular, realized that damage control needed to be done and the other controlled opposition, (((Paleoconservatism))), needed to be resurrected and sexed-up for a younger generation.
The reason for the deceit…
It is commonly understood that Neo Conservatism is a Jewish movement in origin, espousing international aggression for the sake of Israeli interests; it came to heights of opportunity for its wars for Israel after the fall of the Soviet Union. Its originators were Trotskyists, Leo-Strauss and Irving Kristol; its economic and popular roots in The Vienna School of Logical Positivism, which tried to faithfully realize Wittgenstein’s attempt at a foundational ontology in the Tractatus Logico Philosophicus; in turn, giving berth to the Vienna School of economics with Hayek and von Mises, the so-called objectivist (really subjectivist) philosophy of Ayn Rand and the magic hand economics being advanced by Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan, through the repeal of the Glass-Steagall act to the point of the mortgage bust of 2008.
In the meantime, egregious YKW anti-racist programs such as “Disparate Impact” had been weaponized Lockeatine prohibition of White Classification to its sine qua non – i.e., rupturing any capacity for White classification and discrimination thereupon, even if in sheer defense.-
In the face of intersectionality with their more than ever hegemony and its evident culpability in destruction of society and White interests in particular, Paul Gottfried went to work on damage control by sounding the need for a re-vamped Paleo Conservatism, an “Alternative Right.”
Paleoconservatism is a Jewish controlled opposition concept that begins with Frank Meyer. It prescribes a “fusionism” of Judeo-Christianity, The American Constitution and its Enlightenment values – i.e., a fusionism of elements that don’t fuse very well, but Americans being used to these ingredients, they could be sold on it; the premier example being Ronald Reagan, a protégé of Frank Meyer. Besides its chief proponent, Paul Gottfried, prominent non Jews Patrick Buchanan, Joe Sobran and Sam Francis came along with this program. However, by the mid 90s, William F. Buckley and the National Review’s philo-Semitism had beaten any corrective measures and resistance to Jewish over-compensation that existed in Paleoconservatism and it gave way to the Neo Con program in the 1990s and (Operation Clean Break: using American Military to effect Israel friendly regime change in the nations surrounding Israel_ through the Bush jr. administration in the 2000s and into the Obama regime with the assassination of Gaddafi.
But with the subprime mortgage crisis of 2008, in particular, it was already high time and the likes of Paul Gottfried were getting antsy to get a new controlled opposition operation in order.
The YKW needed to keep White identity identified with The Right, in fact where they would be in alignment with Jewish interests on the right, especially now that Jewish niche hegemony is in greater power and influence than ever.
Otherwise, the intersectionality of matters together with growing awareness of where the problems of White societal destruction were coming from would lead to some form of White Left Ethnonationalism, the kind proposed here:
Which would propose effective unions of White people (really, unions of our people, not of trades in particular) and coalitions thereof, which would then begin to have the power and leverage to hold to account those who were screwing them over; in fact they would be able to vocalize and take action against those who were fucking them over:
Number one, of course, would be Jewish power and influence as exercised through 7 – 10 elite niches (money; religion; politics, media; academia; law/courts; international business; crime; NGO’s, foundations and trusts; military/industrial/medical technology), along with their bio-pattern; the YKW encourage complicitness with right wingers – problem 1a observed from the perspective of White Left Ethnonationalism are our traitors – the YKW encouraging them to emphasize their “objective merit” for their success and non-accountability to their group, as such – primed and paid off by the YKW for betraying White group interests; and pretty much the same thing with liberals – they are encouraged with the same objectivist argument, that they are free to do as they please, to rupture group bounds and accountability thereof on pseudo natural, objective grounds, and given this enhanced license and licentiousness by the YKW’s cultural Marxism and the weaponized liberalism of Lockeatine civil rights.
With the possibility of Whites marshalling the intersectionality of awareness and opposition to the greater than ever hegemony of Jewish power and influence with the 2008 subprime meltdown, Paul Gottfried called upon his fellow Paleocons to come up with an “Alternative Right” for people, particularly White people, to identify with against afflictions of political correctness and the left. As the prior leader of the Paleocon’s “National Policy Institute”, Sam Francis, had passed away, fresh leadership was sought; after a brief interim of another head, Richard Spencer was tapped and mentored to some extent by Gottfried (and Bowden and Regnery) on stewarding a new generation of reactionaries into right-wing identity against, “the left.”
With Richard Spencer, Paul Gottfried’s call for an “Alternative Right” took a loose form in cooperation with Regnery publishing and its preferred political angles. Their revised Paleoconservative Alt-right entailed something like a “tentosphere”, that is, a tent of tents, each tent featuring, in fact, veritably requiring some salient, right wing anti-social feature that members of that tent adhered-to despite social stigma. Thus, you would have the standard Paleocon crown with their affinity for the contradiction of the US Constitution, its Enlightenment values along with their Christianity – socially stigmatic because it makes absolutely no sense, is obsequious to the point of self and group destruction. Then there was a new addition, the right wing Jewish tent. This was called “The Alt Lite”, stigmatic because you had Jews circulating among dedicated anti-Semites and ostensibly working against the conventional liberalism of their Jewish brethren., However, they were strategically places among the other tents, including nutty conspiracy theorists, the scientistic reactionary who could not get over modernity and were determined to chase after red cape misrepresentations of post modernity and finally, of course, the Nazis, with their epistemological blunder of natural fallacy.
With America’s PC beleaguered White demographic being overwhelmingly German and second most Irish, they are a market disposed to literature overly sympathetic to the Nazi perspective in their reactionary state. Their obvious social stigma also provided a ready circuit breaker if White identity was getting too far in response to Jewish power and influence.
By the end of Obama’s second term, the primary concern of Israeli and diaspora interests was getting out of the Iran Deal. Thus, the Jewish tent, :”the Alt Lite” was assiduously at work to put Donald Trump into the White house for that explicit purpose – to undo the Iran Deal.
They needed to overcome the decades old article of faith among radical White Nationalists, that there was not a dime’s worth of difference between the Republican or Democratic Party when it comes to White interests. And indeed, while it has shaken out that Whites were not as bad off with a Trump presidency – it bought us some time and Supreme Court Justices maybe not as bad) and we would have been better off with his re-election (what could be worse than Hillary or Biden/Kamala – no brainer) my own focus has been the meta-game (heads they win/tales you lose that the YKW were playing. They would have been ok with either Hillary or Donald, but much preferred Donald (yes, Brutus, Donald was part of the YKW plan) because he would undo the Iran Deal whereas Hillary was part of the administration that implemented it.
Without being 1,000 percent sure, the likes of Mike Enoch and his TRS network has the hallmarks of having been handed a mandate and a portfolio from a marketing campaign to take the Gottfried-Regnery-Spencer concern of revamp Paleoconservatism to an Alternative-Right. Enoch was apparently told to spare no outrage in order to get ahead of those susceptible to be overly Nazi sympathetic – be as outrageous as you need, with Holocaust denial, gas-chamber jokes, you name it – we have all kinds of memes for you: if people object to your swastika’s and stiff arm salutes, call them “optics cucks” because we (wink) understand (nod) that Hitler and Nazi Germany were really right and good, but (next meme) “normies” will never understand that, so play it cool with the “optics.”
Bad optics is a meme that can also be deployed by more traditional paleocons to discuss bad representation of the “underlying truth” of Christianity and America first (i.e., paleoconservative “fusionism”).
Let’s talk Matrix to the normies to bring them around – more memes against the characterology of “The Left”, these “Social Justice Warriors” (how horrible that anyone would want social justice now that Jews are on top of everything) who have uphold impossibly anti-natural concepts and invariable seek the equally impossible “equality” of peoples.
Ingratiate yourselves to the reactionaries, steer them away from any socially responsible, accountable, leftist type organization and advocacy and persuade these people (especially this vast German/Irish demographic) to vote for Trump so that the Iran Deal can be undone. With that accomplished we can invoke the circuit breaker, Mike Enoch initiating a few stiff arm salutes to Richard Spencer, as he “hails” Trump’s victory. After that, we can implode the whole Alt-Right project with “Unite the Right” Charlottesville (idiotic: the thing that the alt right had going for it was that it could not be easily pin pointed). Trump’s sympathy for both sides will allow us to get rid of FED Chair Aspirant Gary Cohn, who can’t tolerate the least bit of sympathy for Nazism while his policies would have served the U.S. and its Mid West industry as opposed to the designs of his internationalist YKW brethren (hence why they were happy to repulse him into resignation – “good people on both sides”).
That’s not to say that the Gottfried inspired marketing campaign would be discontinued. Millennials in particular would never realize how abnormal it was for everyone in the world to be placing all our problems with a characterology of “THE Left.”
And with the Alt-Right and its Nazi tent having served its detonating purpose, shift in focus back to standard Paleoconservatim could be presented as a sane alternative, with Nick Fuentes promoting the Abrahamic yoke of Christianity, and Paul Gottfried pretending that this is so “rebellious”, that your Christianity, that is something that “The Left” just can’t tolerate.
In a word, he is trying to prevent an accurate understanding of Post Modern correctives, as they would serve White systemic interests, our homeostasis and thus, autonomy and sovereignty. Jewish interests have red caped the best ideas of social organization and advocacy and weaponized them against Whites; and these red capes, this internationalist Marxist and anti-White Cultural Marxist left, is red caped as “THE Left” to Whites, with an oxymoronic connotation, as their red capes are wont to have, of “The Left as liberalism.”
Hence Gottfried is wielding two of the most fundamental red capes against White interests, The Left and Christianity
One must suspect that it is not a coincidence that Gottfried was a student of the infamous Cultural Marxist, Herbert Marcuse. And that Gottfried is manifesting damage control and camouflage/crypsis over another end of the parasitic YKW system, seeing Marcus’s destruction to Judeo/Christian values, Gottfried re-proposes the yoking red cape moral order of Christianity as a “solution” to that destruction. Not incidentally, to the superficial observer, “free love” was a central aspect of the hippie movement; but in fact, this was an affectation largely introduced by the likes of Marcuse in order to subvert the true essence of the hippie motives – organic there being – particularly for males – amidst one’s people (midtdasein); now, if by contrast, males from just any which where are free to have at the sex, no holds barred, of your group’s females, that is not Being for males. And yet, that its the kind of popular mis-attribution (free love) associated with the hippie motive by YKW media; and it is very important to clear away these misrepresentations.
But both for the abundance of red cape misrepresentations of post modern thought – thought which is otherwise and at its good purpose meant to re-direct the world view into praxis and social accountability thereby – and for the good fortune of their Boomer situation, which would not want to view their good fortune as such , i.e., due in significant part to the luck of their generational situation – The Boomers, particularly the STEM types, have been more than susceptible to chase the YKW red cape misrepresentations of “post modernity”, they have been intransigently hostile to correctives thereof.
Posted by Trainspotter on Thu, 01 May 2014 00:16 | #
Thorn: “As expected, the news blackout WRT white genocide continues.”
Yes, which is why it is important to make the link ourselves, wherever we may post comments. Paul Weston, opponent of white genocide, was arrested for exercising his free speech rights.